Katie Barron
@ktbarron.bsky.social
Reposted by Katie Barron
The goal is to overwhelm us so we give up. Don't do that!
January 22, 2025 at 7:02 PM
The goal is to overwhelm us so we give up. Don't do that!
Reposted by Katie Barron
Let’s see - I’m being sentenced for 34 felonies on Friday, I’ve nominated a bunch of unschooled idiots for my cabinet, and I owe E Jean $483 million. What can I distract the idiots with?
January 8, 2025 at 4:36 AM
Let’s see - I’m being sentenced for 34 felonies on Friday, I’ve nominated a bunch of unschooled idiots for my cabinet, and I owe E Jean $483 million. What can I distract the idiots with?
Reposted by Katie Barron
Yes, and: a 2019 study proved 95% of all deepfakes were nonconsensual porn. Women were the victims of 90% of it. Most targeted by this aren't famous (some are).
In Dec, @ninajankowicz.com's American Sunlight Project released data that 1 in 6 women serving in Congress are victims of this.
In Dec, @ninajankowicz.com's American Sunlight Project released data that 1 in 6 women serving in Congress are victims of this.
January 4, 2025 at 4:17 PM
Yes, and: a 2019 study proved 95% of all deepfakes were nonconsensual porn. Women were the victims of 90% of it. Most targeted by this aren't famous (some are).
In Dec, @ninajankowicz.com's American Sunlight Project released data that 1 in 6 women serving in Congress are victims of this.
In Dec, @ninajankowicz.com's American Sunlight Project released data that 1 in 6 women serving in Congress are victims of this.
Reposted by Katie Barron
Let’s be clear—the fact checkers have not “been” politically biased as Zuck suggests, but have been *perceived as such* because of politically motivated efforts to smear them, one that Zuck is now participating in and capitulating to. 1/
"We're going to get rid of fact-checkers and replace them with community notes, similar to X, starting in the U.S," Mark Zuckerberg announces
He asserts that "the fact-checkers have just been too politically biased, and have destroyed more trust than they've created, especially in the U.S."
He asserts that "the fact-checkers have just been too politically biased, and have destroyed more trust than they've created, especially in the U.S."
January 7, 2025 at 12:29 PM
Let’s be clear—the fact checkers have not “been” politically biased as Zuck suggests, but have been *perceived as such* because of politically motivated efforts to smear them, one that Zuck is now participating in and capitulating to. 1/