Rhett Derrick
lawzag.bsky.social
Rhett Derrick
@lawzag.bsky.social
You’ll be hearing from my lawyer. Not to threaten litigation or anything. Just, you know, to commiserate with you about my behavior.
There was a pretty massive state benefits fraud ring in Minnesota that would normally be pretty embarrassing for the state government. But Trump and the right wing have almost completely drowned it out with the racism and attacks on Omar.
December 2, 2025 at 11:37 PM
I would support giving New Zealand to Australia because they would be very mad about it, but it probably wouldn’t break out into a shooting war.
December 2, 2025 at 9:27 PM
Wilson over Dak, but I agree that Wilson in the HOF is iffy. The two lock QBs that are active are Aaron Rodgers and Patrick Mahomes. Stafford is probably the next closest.
December 2, 2025 at 7:25 PM
I’ve seen it where parents cut kid off from money because of drugs, and in turn kid stops talking to parents because of this slight.

But I’ve seen the other way too.
December 2, 2025 at 5:55 PM
Drugs would be the pretty common exception to this.
December 2, 2025 at 5:46 PM
No! That’s like one of the maybe ~20ish pages that are useful and will need to look at every year or so.
December 2, 2025 at 5:45 PM
I found South American Otto Von Bismarck’s burner account.
December 2, 2025 at 5:11 PM
I don’t think they could do it right now.

Frankly, I don’t think they’ll be able to do it after Trump’s second term either.
December 2, 2025 at 4:42 PM
I will be the first to admit that I’m not a subject matter expert here, but I would not classify that as a butt plug.

And if that is a butt plug, then maybe the counterfeit butt plugs are getting an unfair shake.
December 2, 2025 at 4:37 PM
I didn’t know Jeb Bush taught at NC State.
December 2, 2025 at 3:58 PM
What are the butt plug brands have developed secondary meaning and are known for the their quality?
December 2, 2025 at 3:50 AM
We can deal with the Haig though, he’s in control of the government.
December 2, 2025 at 3:21 AM
Only applies to QBs who are not runners or defenseless receivers.
December 2, 2025 at 2:40 AM
Yep. We send them home on a Greyhound bus.
December 2, 2025 at 2:32 AM
Did you punch a hole in your bedroom door?
December 1, 2025 at 11:17 PM
Bullying doesn’t seem like the correct word to me. But colloquially using the word bullying is plausible.
December 1, 2025 at 11:08 PM
Court says that this curricular speech given in response to class material was pedagogical and thus it did not violate the First Amendment to kick Oyama out of the program based on the speech.

scholar.google.com/scholar_case...
scholar.google.com
December 1, 2025 at 10:14 PM
Students shouldn’t be coddled if it it holding other students back. University of Hawaii said they weren’t going to place him in with student teaching assignment and thus he was out of the program. The University’s program was also tied in with the state teacher credentialing.
December 1, 2025 at 10:14 PM
I forgot about Oyama, which is also relevant to curricular speech. In Oyama, an education student gave some not great answers as part of his assignments. Namely, he said he didn’t see a problem with teachers having consensual relationships with their students, and that special education
December 1, 2025 at 10:14 PM
I'm going to end it here. Basically, teachers have lots or room to grade the substance of a student's work and structure assignments that conflict with a student's personal views. What the teacher cannot do is target a student based on those views or use the teacher's discretion as a pretext. /end
December 1, 2025 at 7:42 PM
Teacher makes a lot of comments about why he is big mad about student not standing for the Pledge of Allegiance. Court unsurprisingly says there is lots of proof of pretext.

scholar.google.com/scholar_case...
scholar.google.com
December 1, 2025 at 7:42 PM