maybe: leif weatherby
@leifw.bsky.social
870 followers 850 following 150 posts
Hegel, cybernetics, Buffalo Bills
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
leifw.bsky.social
Language Machines is out today, can be ordered from @uminnpress.bsky.social www.upress.umn.edu/978151791932... - gathering a few parergonal writings below 1/
Reposted by maybe: leif weatherby
t-shoemaker.bsky.social
The first in a (jam-packed) series of events on cultural AI this year from DTL. More incoming!
leifw.bsky.social
The Digital Theory Lab at NYU will host Karen Hao for a book talk on Empire of AI on Monday, October 13, RSVP required here:
as.nyu.edu/research-cen...
Karen Hao on Empire of AI
Lunch will be available for the event. Event begins at 12pm
as.nyu.edu
leifw.bsky.social
The Digital Theory Lab at NYU will host Karen Hao for a book talk on Empire of AI on Monday, October 13, RSVP required here:
as.nyu.edu/research-cen...
Karen Hao on Empire of AI
Lunch will be available for the event. Event begins at 12pm
as.nyu.edu
leifw.bsky.social
Man if only cognitive maps were still functioning
tedunderwood.com
We're already in the Torment Nexus; what I want is a map of it
leifw.bsky.social
Oh amazing to hear! I hope it’s, well, generative
Reposted by maybe: leif weatherby
beenwrekt.bsky.social
Greg Olsen is so committed to the decision-theory bit: "Just because the outcome is good, doesn't mean the decision was correct."

Anyway, Carson Wentz.
leifw.bsky.social
It was! And they let it slip
Reposted by maybe: leif weatherby
t-shoemaker.bsky.social
Extremely good stuff from Leif here
leifw.bsky.social
i was on Disintegrator podcast, a really awesome conversation
podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/3...
leifw.bsky.social
i was on Disintegrator podcast, a really awesome conversation
podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/3...
leifw.bsky.social
the political economy of bad thinking, a really great piece about the *hostile synergy* between B and X from Henry
leifw.bsky.social
The humanities long since in its Cringe Era
tedunderwood.com
The AHA was right to try to produce guidance on AI, but I wonder if it's even possible. This statement got dinged , of course, for being insufficiently critical. But they were working so hard to be critical that they wrote sentences (like the blue one) that are def false.+

bsky.app/profile/hist...
AI produces texts, images, audio, and video, not truths.

Generative AI is a remarkable technological achievement, but it has undeniable limitations. An awareness of these limitations is important for instructors and students alike. LLMs produce text using an algorithm to select each word from existing books, articles, images, and other media, including AI-created sources. AI texts do not reflect truth; rather, they echo and synthesize, sometimes poorly, sources on which the model has been trained. Generative AI reproduces the limitations of its own training material. By contrast, historians learn to identify and dissect author biases, experiences, social environment, and hidden motivations. Students need to learn to interpret AI-generated content with a critical lens, using their historical training to assess material rather than passively accept it as true or complete.
leifw.bsky.social
Real different vibes man, good luck
Reposted by maybe: leif weatherby
himself.bsky.social
I'm going to write on this, but the subtext is that the Nate Silver crowd have shifted hard away from political science, and hard towards the Silicon Valley mindset as a foundational source for purportedly better grounded knowledge. This by @beenwrekt.bsky.social and @leifw.bsky.social
The Bookmaker | The Point Magazine
In the lead-up to the 2008 election, Nate Silver revolutionized the way we talk about politics, bringing cold, hard, numerical facts to a world that had been dominated by the gut feelings of reporters...
thepointmag.com
leifw.bsky.social
extremely imporant one-two from Dan here:
"First, the communication of the polling results to policymakers is likely to be at least as difficult a problem as the election forecast presentation, probably much more so. Second, the technical problems with polling are going to be worse."
Reposted by maybe: leif weatherby
jraber.bsky.social
UChicago alumni: we are drafting a letter targeting a few of the more persuadable-seeming trustees urging them to change course on humanities funding. Please sign:

docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F...

Explanation to follow ...
leifw.bsky.social
Find the lie (in this case)
Reposted by maybe: leif weatherby
rogerwhitson.bsky.social
"automated language results from Goedel and Jackobson systems interacting together, without cognition. The incomplete and greedy combine to show us what language is in the absence of cognition and present a strong attractor for meaning."
—Leif Weatherby, Language Machines
Reposted by maybe: leif weatherby
maxmcc.com
loving @leifw.bsky.social’s Language Machines so far. in particular:

“It seems that mental illness, or at a minimum neurosis, should be a criterion for passing the Turing test, but it is equally unlikely that this view will ever be adopted by engineers or journalists.”
leifw.bsky.social
Language Machines is in The Observer!
leifw.bsky.social
Language Machines is out today, can be ordered from @uminnpress.bsky.social www.upress.umn.edu/978151791932... - gathering a few parergonal writings below 1/
Reposted by maybe: leif weatherby
klumpen.bsky.social
Finally got these two in the mail, been looking forward to reading both.
leifw.bsky.social
An almost universally acknowledged point that mysteriously disappears whenever conversation turns to AI
davidcrespo.bsky.social
basically I think I reject the concept of "direct contact" in use there. it's a bad metaphor for how cognition works
leifw.bsky.social
Text is part of the world