⚙️ ⭐ 🔨
banner
lezoe.bsky.social
⚙️ ⭐ 🔨
@lezoe.bsky.social
freedom > everything. trans woman - emphasis on the "trans". love furries, kinky people, and rent lowering posters. keep queerness weird. no conservatives, no christians, no centrists, no terfs/radfems.
the only way i see them solving the homework AI problem is extending school by an hour to conduct proctored pencil and paper reinforcement exercises
January 11, 2026 at 5:15 PM
Reposted by ⚙️ ⭐ 🔨
... I feel like protecting trans women is only about protecting some trans women. And that's a dynamic I've seen plenty around here, and it's not one I like a lot of cis people getting to throw in on honestly. It's bad enough when it's just us.
January 6, 2026 at 5:59 AM
so where can we get an actually scientific list from now that the government is no longer trustworthy?
January 7, 2026 at 2:23 PM
it's fucking crazy that so many trans women in particular throw their lot in with a movement that has violent transphobia so tightly woven into its history
January 7, 2026 at 1:06 PM
Reposted by ⚙️ ⭐ 🔨
Came here to post that, but also how she happily responded and liked responses framing the mod maker as predatorial, harmful.

As well as the whole tone of the thread that was "cis men are such pigs ain't they"

The mod maker is not a cis man.

The thread is not all her fault but it had horrid shit
January 5, 2026 at 7:59 PM
Reposted by ⚙️ ⭐ 🔨
Figures. In my experience this kind of behavior is almost invariably tied to TERFism, or even if it's not explicitly shown, an underlying TERF ideology.

It's a particularly nasty slur because there's no defense against it and it can outright ruin lives and careers. Actual demon to use it as such.
January 5, 2026 at 1:26 AM
this might have sounded rational to an assimilationist 15 years ago (i never said it *was* rational) but the implied deal of "pass and never mention your history and you can have a normal life" is long gone
January 4, 2026 at 11:30 PM
bottom line is we had no business endangering our own soldiers and pissing on international gentlemans-agreements to remove him
January 4, 2026 at 8:03 PM
have they tried throwing us under the bus harder?
January 3, 2026 at 12:37 AM
it's fucking crazy how racism trumps science every time with these people
January 3, 2026 at 12:36 AM
the usaid thing is such a self own because the odds of a pandemic surge over 9000% when we're not helping poor nations put infections down early and treat people with aids
January 3, 2026 at 12:35 AM
check your levels. if they're fine, it could be psychological
January 3, 2026 at 12:23 AM
she's not, and i'm really sick of closet TERFs and puriteens who have an addiction to paedojacketing trans people

i will say though that the take was exceptionally ill-reasoned because she minimised it. AI generated CSAM is a reality and a real legal problem that needs to be dealt with
January 3, 2026 at 12:07 AM
i more than understand the impulse to protect free speech, but at least make well reasoned and substantiated claims when you drop a hot take
January 2, 2026 at 11:51 PM
couple criticisms i have of this take:

1) the water cooling claim is unscientific. evaporative cooling has a major problem, which is that it displaces the LOCAL water supply into the atmosphere, which may drag it far away from where it is needed
2) csam is illegal whether or not it is a real photo
January 2, 2026 at 11:50 PM
it really speeds certain things up. but that's just it, it's not necessarily replacing a whole or even half of a developer, it's a productivity multiplier for people who are already skilled
January 2, 2026 at 11:42 PM