Lily Batchelder
@lilybatch.bsky.social
1.3K followers 110 following 67 posts
Kopple Family Professor, NYU Law. Faculty Director @taxlawcenter.org. Former Assistant Secretary for Tax Policy at Treasury; Deputy Director, National Economic Council; Chief Tax Counsel, Senate Finance Committee.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Lily Batchelder
dashching.bsky.social
THREAD:

GOP Senators say they're trying to scale back the SALT cap relief in the House bill. But could the approach to SALT in the Senate bill actually end up *more* generous & costly overall than the House bill? Do Senators – or does anyone – even know, despite the intense political focus on SALT?
lilybatch.bsky.social
JCT tables follow. (Prior chart was for 2027 and calculated from JCT tables.) 2/
lilybatch.bsky.social
New JCT distributional estimates of proposed tax changes by the Senate Finance Committee. Compared to current law, the bill heavily skews benefits to the wealthy as a share of after-tax income. 1/
Reposted by Lily Batchelder
taxlawcenter.org
Full recording of our discussion on risks to taxpayer privacy from DOGE & related efforts featuring Daniel Werfel, Lily Batchelder, Brandon DeBot, Elizabeth Laird, and David Padrino nyu.zoom.us/rec/share/IF...
lilybatch.bsky.social
Looking forward to this discussion starting at 1:30 with Danny Werfel and cybersecurity, IT modernization, and tax policy experts!
lilybatch.bsky.social
On June 3, I'm moderating a panel for the @taxlawcenter.org on the privacy risks of unprecedented access / sharing of taxpayer data across government. We'll hear from Former IRS Commissioner Daniel Werfel plus Brandon DeBot, Elizabeth Laird & David Padrino. Please join! nyu.zoom.us/webinar/regi...
Register for Webinar: Understanding Risks to Taxpayer Privacy
Please join the Tax Law Center for a virtual discussion of the legal, privacy, and cybersecurity risks of unprecedented efforts to access, use, and share taxpayer data across government for purposes f...
nyu.zoom.us
Reposted by Lily Batchelder
brendanvduke.bsky.social
New @centeronbudget.bsky.social analysis of the draft GOP tax plan released yesterday:

Unsurprisingly, it provides enormous tax cuts for the wealthy—including an average annual $65k cut for the top 1%—while doing little for low- and moderate-income families in 2027 (and even less by 2029).
lilybatch.bsky.social
If the President can announce that he is revoking the tax-exempt status of a charity, we have crossed a rubicon that has no clear end. What will stop him or any President from weaponizing the IRS to intimidate any political opponent or group he dislikes into silence? 2/3
lilybatch.bsky.social
The President just effectively signed a statement that he is committing a crime, violating a criminal statute enacted with overwhelming bipartisan majorities (it passed 96-2 in the Senate). Here is the law and his post. 1/3
lilybatch.bsky.social
Harvard may not be at the top of most people’s list of favorite charitable causes, but if the President’s and WH's unlawful interference in IRS actions regarding specific TPs and charities isn’t stopped, it means he or any president can come for your church or community group.
Harvard sues the Trump administration in escalating confrontation
Lawsuit argues that government actions, including freezing $2.2 billion in federal funding, violated the First Amendment and didn’t follow legal procedures.
www.washingtonpost.com
lilybatch.bsky.social
This violate the law (which was passed by a vote of 96-2 in the Senate in 1998) that makes it a crime for the President and his political advisors to directly or indirectly interfere in IRS audits or investigations. 11/11 medium.com/@taxlawcente...
Understanding the Tax System’s Protections Against Political Interference in the Tax Code
By: The Tax Law Center
medium.com
lilybatch.bsky.social
Now R lawmakers are silent when the President – the most political actor of all! – is pressuring the IRS to revoke the tax exempt status of nonprofits he doesn’t like. 10/
lilybatch.bsky.social
One of the recommendations from the bipartisan Senate Finance Committee report was that *anyone* with influence over whether and how tax exempts are reviewed and audited should be precluded from participating in political work, even when off-duty. 9/
lilybatch.bsky.social
Despite the fact that it is not crazy (except as a political matter) to select applications for tax exempt status for review about whether they intend to abide by lobbying limits if their name includes terms associated with electioneering, 7/
lilybatch.bsky.social
Despite the fact that these weren’t even audits but rather keywords were used in triaging applications for tax-exempt status, 6/
lilybatch.bsky.social
Despite the fact that there was no evidence of interference by political appointees (let alone the WH or President!), despite the fact that the IRS voluntarily disclosed this information without prompting, 5/