Elizabeth Stokoe
@lizstokoe.bsky.social
Professor and Associate Vice President (Impact) at #LSE | Psychologist | Hon FBPsS | Hon Prof @lborouniversity.bsky.social | @IndependentSage.bsky.social Behaviour Group | Conversation Analyst #EMCA | she/her | own views | #AcademicSky
Hope you enjoy reading it (we definitely enjoyed writing it!)
December 18, 2025 at 7:14 AM
Hope you enjoy reading it (we definitely enjoyed writing it!)
Reposted by Elizabeth Stokoe
Reposted by Elizabeth Stokoe
Intro not too promising:
"This action concerns a false, defamatory, deceptive, disparaging, inflammatory, and malicious depiction of President Trump"
As a general rule, the more bombastic the language the weaker the case.
A strong case does not need such language, a poor case is not saved by it.
"This action concerns a false, defamatory, deceptive, disparaging, inflammatory, and malicious depiction of President Trump"
As a general rule, the more bombastic the language the weaker the case.
A strong case does not need such language, a poor case is not saved by it.
December 16, 2025 at 10:24 AM
Intro not too promising:
"This action concerns a false, defamatory, deceptive, disparaging, inflammatory, and malicious depiction of President Trump"
As a general rule, the more bombastic the language the weaker the case.
A strong case does not need such language, a poor case is not saved by it.
"This action concerns a false, defamatory, deceptive, disparaging, inflammatory, and malicious depiction of President Trump"
As a general rule, the more bombastic the language the weaker the case.
A strong case does not need such language, a poor case is not saved by it.