Louis Wilson
@louisflwilson.bsky.social
HHMI Postdoctoral Scientist at UVA
Biochemistry and structural biology of polysaccharide biosynthesis 🌱🌳🦠🧶🔬
Biochemistry and structural biology of polysaccharide biosynthesis 🌱🌳🦠🧶🔬
one for #glycotime
Hi fellow membrane protein #StructuralBiology people!
Do you use maltoside detergents / model them in your stuctures? Watch out! ⚠️
Most PDB models of LMNG and GDN are wrong ❌, yet continue to be re-used. Spread the word!
See more: doi.org/10.1021/acsc... (w. @sebvidalchem.bsky.social ) #cryoEM
Do you use maltoside detergents / model them in your stuctures? Watch out! ⚠️
Most PDB models of LMNG and GDN are wrong ❌, yet continue to be re-used. Spread the word!
See more: doi.org/10.1021/acsc... (w. @sebvidalchem.bsky.social ) #cryoEM
January 5, 2026 at 2:06 PM
one for #glycotime
Hi fellow membrane protein #StructuralBiology people!
Do you use maltoside detergents / model them in your stuctures? Watch out! ⚠️
Most PDB models of LMNG and GDN are wrong ❌, yet continue to be re-used. Spread the word!
See more: doi.org/10.1021/acsc... (w. @sebvidalchem.bsky.social ) #cryoEM
Do you use maltoside detergents / model them in your stuctures? Watch out! ⚠️
Most PDB models of LMNG and GDN are wrong ❌, yet continue to be re-used. Spread the word!
See more: doi.org/10.1021/acsc... (w. @sebvidalchem.bsky.social ) #cryoEM
January 5, 2026 at 2:05 PM
Hi fellow membrane protein #StructuralBiology people!
Do you use maltoside detergents / model them in your stuctures? Watch out! ⚠️
Most PDB models of LMNG and GDN are wrong ❌, yet continue to be re-used. Spread the word!
See more: doi.org/10.1021/acsc... (w. @sebvidalchem.bsky.social ) #cryoEM
Do you use maltoside detergents / model them in your stuctures? Watch out! ⚠️
Most PDB models of LMNG and GDN are wrong ❌, yet continue to be re-used. Spread the word!
See more: doi.org/10.1021/acsc... (w. @sebvidalchem.bsky.social ) #cryoEM
Peer-reviews by ChatGPT: what is the point? If I wanted a chatbot's opinion I can ask it myself. More action is needed from journals.
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
More than half of researchers now use AI for peer review — often against guidance
A survey of 1,600 academics found that more than 50% have used artificial-intelligence tools while peer reviewing manuscripts.
www.nature.com
December 16, 2025 at 9:49 PM
Peer-reviews by ChatGPT: what is the point? If I wanted a chatbot's opinion I can ask it myself. More action is needed from journals.
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
www.nature.com/articles/d41...