Lightnews — Scholar-powered news

Lucy Barnes @lucy-barnes.bsky.social · 15d

Congratulations!

1 1

Lucy Barnes @lucy-barnes.bsky.social · 26d

100% correct response

Charlotte Lydia Riley @lottelydia.bsky.social · 26d

lol fuck you

Research Professional News @resprofnews.bsky.social · 27d

Ministers ‘want to shift funds away from low-quality research’ .

Universities UK president says institutions cannot afford “unfunded hobbyist research”.

www.researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-uk-u...

1 4

Reposted by Lucy Barnes

Margot Finn @eicathomefinn.bsky.social · Aug 20

'Fewer graduates regret going to university than is widely assumed and the public have a more favourable view of universities than people imagine, according to new research.' 1/3

Public vastly overestimate level of ‘graduate regret’, poll finds

New research highlights misconceptions about higher education, with people more positive about universities than is commonly realised

www.timeshighereducation.com

3 62 170

Lucy Barnes @lucy-barnes.bsky.social · Aug 8

Almost: some of us got lucky and own it

Paul Hünermund @p-hunermund.com · Aug 4

Academia is basically a collection of people who got lucky early on and mistook it for genius. doi.org/10.1073/pnas...

3

Reposted by Lucy Barnes

Federica Genovese @fgenovese.bsky.social · Jul 12

yes, next question

Can me and women be just friends by the economist

2 32

Lucy Barnes @lucy-barnes.bsky.social · Jul 9

Please, God, no

1

Lucy Barnes @lucy-barnes.bsky.social · Jul 9

My hunch is that it is hard to reconcile perceived levels of inequality (high, growing) with the idea that taxes are (sufficiently) progressive

1 4

Lucy Barnes @lucy-barnes.bsky.social · Jul 8

This, but also for research

Tim Onion @bencollins.bsky.social · Jul 7

Also talked about The Onion being inefficient on purpose.

www.status.news/p/the-onion-...

What has it been like shifting from reporter to media executive, managing a staff instead of filing stories yourself? And do you write any of the jokes at The Onion? Or are you strictly managing the business?

The Onion’s process is deeply, beautifully inefficient. Every day, our writers take 150 headlines into a physical writers room in Chicago and whittle them down to maybe one or two. These people throw away the funniest sentence I will ever write in my life six times by noon every weekday.

The point of taking over this place was to preserve this process, which I learned this week is almost assuredly more rigorous than The New York Times.

That’s why I don’t touch any of it. I just try to get more people to pay attention to the output, and get our work into different mediums and new places. We brought back the paper, reinvested in the Onion News Network, bought a full page ad in The Times for something they were going to write anyway. The role is to make the world-class work they’re already doing seep into everyday American life more frequently, and that’s working.

You actually can do this, you know. You can just try to highlight the beauty of things you like and not try to vampirically extract value at every step.

If people get one thing out of this whole Q&A, I hope it’s that. You do not have to make an A.I. version of your own employees that operate at 1.5x speed but produce purely iterative garbage, especially in media and journalism. People don’t actually want that shit. Make a good, human thing and people will bend over backwards to support you. This is a valid way to run a company.

1 4

Lucy Barnes @lucy-barnes.bsky.social · Jun 21

Very Cirrus People

4

Lucy Barnes @lucy-barnes.bsky.social · Jun 2

populism<->austerity doom loop, anyone?

1

Reposted by Lucy Barnes

Jo Wolff @jowolff.bsky.social · May 29

Want people to understand your academic work better? Answer these questions in your writing:

What are the motivations of this project? (Why do it?)

Who are you arguing against?

What alternatives are you rejecting and why?

What follows if you’re right?

These are also good questions for Q&A.

12 25 130

Lucy Barnes @lucy-barnes.bsky.social · Apr 29

Love this but think the gaming element is the cherry; the “seeing like a market” (or if you prefer, the Beatles (can’t buy me love)) is the cake

1 4

Reposted by Lucy Barnes

Dan Sohege @danielsohege.bsky.social · Apr 25

Gender neutral spaces have existed for years, we all know that. It isn't trans and non-binary individuals attacking women without any repercussions, that's men. Nothing about demonising trans and non-binary individuals makes women safer. It does make people more vulnerable though. 3/5

4 33 260

Reposted by Lucy Barnes

BJPIR @bjpir.bsky.social · Apr 23

📣 New BJPIR article out now!

'The political effects of London’s Ultra Low Emission Zone' by Andrew McNeil and Frieder Mitsch

⬇️ Find the full article in #OpenAccess here: buff.ly/QIn8Bm9

@polstudiesassoc.bsky.social

buff.ly

2 2

Reposted by Lucy Barnes

The PS1 startup sound as a lesbian @janus.bsky.social · Apr 22

“define a woman” fine ok, so you know when shania twain says “let’s go girls”? if you go then you’re a woman

13 160 980

Reposted by Lucy Barnes

Cathy Elliott @profcathyelliott.bsky.social · Apr 17

Really excited that our @politicsjournal.bsky.social article on the Joy of the Teaching Track ✨ is out! Co-authored with the brilliant @ellenfelicity.bsky.social, Keith Smith, Kalina Zhekova, @rosegann.bsky.social @mlebourdon.bsky.social – we advocate for enjoying our jobs!
Polisky SoTLsky

The joy of the teaching track: Learning and Teaching in Politics and International Studies - Cathy Elliott, Ellen Watts, Kalina Zhekova, Keith Smith, Rose Gann, Madeleine Le Bourdon, 2025

In recent years, the number of academic jobs in research-intensive universities that are described as ‘academic education route’, ‘teaching and scholarship’, or...

journals.sagepub.com

1 16 37

Lucy Barnes @lucy-barnes.bsky.social · Apr 10

Struck in part 1 by the extent that criticisms of MT (not smart, just works hard; micromanages (“too bossy”); no ideas of her own) echo highly gendered tropes.

more surprising than even the explicit misogyny.

Ofc some women are unoriginal, not smart, conscientious micromanagers, but 🤷‍♀️

2 3

Lucy Barnes @lucy-barnes.bsky.social · Apr 9

I love this but my personal vibe is a mixtape

John Moe @johnmoe.bsky.social · Apr 8

I don’t think I ever got more love or hate for anything I’ve written than I did for this on @mcsweeneys.net.

So many clicks and shares as well as people being furious.

www.mcsweeneys.net/articles/wha...

What Your Favorite Sad Dad Band Says About You

The War on Drugs You make your own paella and take super long naps on Saturday. Like over two hours, consistently. You prefer the smallest possible...

www.mcsweeneys.net

2

Reposted by Lucy Barnes

Rob Ford @robfordmancs.bsky.social · Apr 8

The core trilma here remains the same - the govt needs to accept one of three things: high student migration, higher domestic student fees (or higher taxes to fund universities) or university bankruptcies. Those are the only options, given where we are. Pick one.

Glen O'Hara @gsoh31.bsky.social · Apr 8

The UK government is proposing to finally finish off its universities by further tightening the terms of the graduate visa route. The stupid fools. Playing with dangers they don't even understand. www.ft.com/content/f441...

UK Home Office’s reform of graduate visas runs into opposition

[FREE TO READ] Education department at odds with plan to curb number of overseas students allowed to stay in Britain

www.ft.com

37 350 680

Lucy Barnes @lucy-barnes.bsky.social · Apr 1

Maybe if there were better news 🙁

Hetan Shah @hetanshah.bsky.social · Apr 1

'The proportion who say they have a high interest in news has almost halved in the UK over the last decade, from 70% in 2015 to 38% last year, according to the @reutersinstitute.bsky.social.'
That's why most of us on this platform are a weird sample!
www.theguardian.com/media/2025/a...

Outlets seek fresh strategies as UK poll shows ‘news avoidance’ on the rise

Negative content and distrust among reasons given by audiences as industry works on how to keep them engaged

www.theguardian.com

3

Reposted by Lucy Barnes

will o’the wisp pooley @willpooley.bsky.social · Mar 31

writing books is so easy, i just type out all of the true and original ideas i have about a topic in the correct order but also to exactly the right length without any digressions or mistakes and then bask in the well earned acclaim from my very reasonable peers who recognize pure truths when they s

2 9 81

Lucy Barnes @lucy-barnes.bsky.social · Mar 27

I’m fairly confident that “The Economist”, not the mention the economists, is the answer to this question

Duncan Robinson @duncanrobinson.bsky.social · Mar 27

Who will speak for Henry? “Pity the High Earner, Not Rich Yet”
economist.com/britain/2025...

Who will speak for Henry?

The “High Earner, Not Rich Yet” is the most overlooked voter in British politics

economist.com

1 5

Lucy Barnes @lucy-barnes.bsky.social · Mar 19

Congrats, happy to see this come out!

1 2

Lucy Barnes @lucy-barnes.bsky.social · Mar 19

Right, but why don’t the bond markets want us to have a functional police force (e.g.)?

Lucy Barnes @lucy-barnes.bsky.social · Mar 19

Taking this at face value, what beliefs/behaviour enforce the straitjacket? One or more of voters, markets, or HMT has to be either extremely short sighted or irrational (in different ways) to prefer the total collapse of the public sector to higher taxes/borrowing. And impervious to persuasion.

1