Make it free and app-only, with users required to rank a Top 10. If it's too much of a financial hit I'd be happy to see more sponsorship. Given the size of the global audience, I'm sure there'd be corporate take-up.
Make it free and app-only, with users required to rank a Top 10. If it's too much of a financial hit I'd be happy to see more sponsorship. Given the size of the global audience, I'm sure there'd be corporate take-up.
Remember Monday were excellent. Staging let them down. Switzerland's LEDs were fantastic, yet they were barely used. And the props were pathetic. A song like needed staging like Luxembourg's, not James Newman.
Remember Monday were excellent. Staging let them down. Switzerland's LEDs were fantastic, yet they were barely used. And the props were pathetic. A song like needed staging like Luxembourg's, not James Newman.
Either a mega-ballad song by a diva, or a folky song sung in Welsh. Or perhaps a mega-ballad in Welsh - tap into a national language other than English. But make sure they can SING.
Either a mega-ballad song by a diva, or a folky song sung in Welsh. Or perhaps a mega-ballad in Welsh - tap into a national language other than English. But make sure they can SING.
#Eurovision
#Eurovision
In the current system it means that the quiet, well performed song can only be the preserve of the big 5/host (eg France) because no semi finalist is going to risk a technically good song on a phone vote
Juries need to come back to semis
In the current system it means that the quiet, well performed song can only be the preserve of the big 5/host (eg France) because no semi finalist is going to risk a technically good song on a phone vote
Juries need to come back to semis
(8) Tighten up the rules and make it very clear what qualifies as political, and what qualifies as ‘bringing the competition into disrepute’. The ambiguity is damaging the contest.
(8) Tighten up the rules and make it very clear what qualifies as political, and what qualifies as ‘bringing the competition into disrepute’. The ambiguity is damaging the contest.
(7) Bring back juries to the semi-finals. Currently, some songs juries might favour are eliminated in the semis. This means jury votes are concentrated in fewer songs, which leads to the voting disparity we've seen in the past 3 contests.
(7) Bring back juries to the semi-finals. Currently, some songs juries might favour are eliminated in the semis. This means jury votes are concentrated in fewer songs, which leads to the voting disparity we've seen in the past 3 contests.
(6) Keep the jury vote as it is (12 points to 1 point, and at 50%), but increased the number of expert jurors to 10.
(6) Keep the jury vote as it is (12 points to 1 point, and at 50%), but increased the number of expert jurors to 10.
(5) The other 25% of the public vote should come from a demoscopic (i.e. representative) sample vote from the public. This has been used for both Benidormfest and Sanremo.
(5) The other 25% of the public vote should come from a demoscopic (i.e. representative) sample vote from the public. This has been used for both Benidormfest and Sanremo.
(4) With the increase of points from the public, reduce their percentage of the overall vote share to 25%. This retains a general public vote, but better protects the contest from votes based on geopolitical bias.
(4) With the increase of points from the public, reduce their percentage of the overall vote share to 25%. This retains a general public vote, but better protects the contest from votes based on geopolitical bias.
(3) Increase the number of countries awarded points by the public, from top 10 to top 20. This removes the cliff edge that happens for songs that finish just under the top 10, whilst retaining the risk (and fun) of the dreaded nul points.
(3) Increase the number of countries awarded points by the public, from top 10 to top 20. This removes the cliff edge that happens for songs that finish just under the top 10, whilst retaining the risk (and fun) of the dreaded nul points.