Luke Sjulson
@lukesjulson.bsky.social
4K followers 2.3K following 390 posts
MD/PhD neuroscientist/psychiatrist. Decision-making, addiction, multi-region ephys and imaging in vivo, novel optical methods for spatial transcriptomics https://sjulsonlab.org
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
lukesjulson.bsky.social
Neuroscience students asked us to teach a PRACTICAL course on experimental methods, and it is now on YouTube!

Please like and repost to help us get the word out!

www.youtube.com/playlist?lis...

Lecture 1: Signals and data acquisition
Focusing on hardware, digital/analog I/O, synchronization
🧵
Neuroscience methods - YouTube
Nanocourse: Approaches to Study Neural Circuits This course was taught by Anita Autry, Tiago Gonçalves, and Luke Sjulson at Albert Einstein College of Medici...
www.youtube.com
lukesjulson.bsky.social
that was available at the time. In some cases the clinician makes an obvious error, but in a case like this where the correct diagnosis was made and it's a choice between two different treatment options, there can be a lot of gray area, and wrong-in-retrospect does not necessarily mean it was wrong
lukesjulson.bsky.social
I'm glad to hear that your mom is doing well. Without knowing anything about the specific details of your mom's case, I would say that in situations like this Monday morning quarterbacking is easy, and it's not always clear cut what the "right" and "wrong" choices were with the information
lukesjulson.bsky.social
Yeah, clinicians (including myself) are wrong sometimes, no question. Medicine is intrinsically hard, and it isn’t easy to stay up to date. That doesn’t mean that professional clinicians don’t have knowledge and insight that laypeople don’t
lukesjulson.bsky.social
Often the worst examples are people who’ve experienced an illness first hand and think they understand the entire scope of that illness better than professional clinicians
lukesjulson.bsky.social
You’re right, and I think a key difference is that professionals see thousands of people, and laypeople (even those with direct personal experience) tend to overgeneralize from small N examples and underestimate the complexity and heterogeneity of mental illness
Reposted by Luke Sjulson
jonathanstea.bsky.social
It can be very easy for people who have never professionally sat with people (and their families) who experience the devastation of mental illness to pontificate about its existence and treatment from an armchair.
lukesjulson.bsky.social
I think everyone in my lab wants to do that with the entire building we’re in
lukesjulson.bsky.social
I think so. But I’m not sure that PMTs have changed that much since then, other than GaAsP electrodes
lukesjulson.bsky.social
Good question, I don’t know. I suspect it’s one of the PMTs from the Super K neutrino observatory
lukesjulson.bsky.social
Thus must have been made by @hamamatsucorp.bsky.social, right? “Photon is our business” indeed
lukesjulson.bsky.social
Here’s a better image with my hand in front of it for scale
lukesjulson.bsky.social
Look at the size of this photomultiplier tube in the Nobel Prize museum. Imagine doing two photon imaging with one of those!
lukesjulson.bsky.social
It makes me sad there is an entire generation that has not seen Office Space
lukesjulson.bsky.social
On one hand, i agree that we know exactly how LLMs work, and on the other hand I don’t. “How something works” can mean a lot of different things. But we can be confident that LLMs don’t have “consciousness” or whatever. I’m not sure whether that will be true for models 10 yrs from now
lukesjulson.bsky.social
That is precisely what has been happening over the past several years, with many of the top ML people leaving academia
lukesjulson.bsky.social
Language is how other people convey their thoughts to us, so we are naturally prone to take language as evidence of thought. But evolutionarily, thought is much older and deeper than language
oxinabox.bsky.social
as a girl with a PhD in natural language processing and machine learning it's actually offensive to me when you say "we don't know how LLMs work so they might be conscious"

I didn't spend 10 years in mines of academia to be told ignorance is morally equal knowledge.

We know exactly how LLMs work.
Reposted by Luke Sjulson
manfredic.bsky.social
I’m pleased to share our new paper, “Hippocampal ripple diversity organizes neuronal reactivation dynamics in the offline brain”, out in @cp-neuron.bsky.social !

With @vitorlds.bsky.social and David Dupret, we show that diversity in ripple current profiles shapes reactivation dynamics
Reposted by Luke Sjulson
kristorpjensen.bsky.social
I’m super excited to finally put my recent work with @behrenstimb.bsky.social on bioRxiv, where we develop a new mechanistic theory of how PFC structures adaptive behaviour using attractor dynamics in space and time!

www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
lukesjulson.bsky.social
Congrats, Kurt, and good luck! R01s get much easier over time, whether you want them to or not
Reposted by Luke Sjulson
furbyhancock.bsky.social
Too late, Batman. Once this Tylenol floods the city's water supply, my wiki won't run out of editors ever again
lukesjulson.bsky.social
I was texting someone about the Tylenol/autism announcement, and for the first time, I accidentally typed “ducking” and my phone successfully autocorrected it to “fucking”
lukesjulson.bsky.social
Congrats on the paper btw! Looks like a tour de force