Anne Lutz Fernandez
banner
lutzfernandez.bsky.social
Anne Lutz Fernandez
@lutzfernandez.bsky.social
Ex-banker, marketer, & English teacher: pick your ad hominem. Co-author of nonfiction books Carjacked & Schooled. Cranky in the AM.
Newsletter: https://nobody-wants-this.ghost.io/
for one thing, teenagers don't sleep during the week
November 24, 2025 at 3:06 PM
I have energy for about one of these pieces a month. But also, I should be cleaning my house.
November 24, 2025 at 3:05 PM
Unfortunately, it's because the agenda is to blame schools for a mental health crisis and the response to it. Oh yeah, and blame parents for overtreating their children in pursuit of academic success. Nice
November 24, 2025 at 3:02 PM
Hard agree with most of this large chunk--why isn't this what the article is about, I plead.
November 24, 2025 at 3:00 PM
Mostly yes here--except for the fact that Common Core was not focused on rote learning. Again, belongs in that other imagined article.
November 24, 2025 at 2:57 PM
Reposted by Anne Lutz Fernandez
I've always said if you want to know what's best for kids, look at where elites send their kids and what they provide their students.

The US is absolutely not willing to provide that for poor and working families, so I fundamentally can't be bothered with any of this.
November 24, 2025 at 2:53 PM
It's stupider on a second and third read.
November 24, 2025 at 2:53 PM
"Either way" when the way would seem to matter quite a bit. Last sentence belongs in a different article with the parts I cheered earlier. But that article would have to admit that the testing structure and culture of NCLB lives on.
November 24, 2025 at 2:52 PM
This insidious sentence suggests a conspiracy between school counselors, teachers, and administrators to boost test scores by getting kids diagnosed when they shouldn't have been.

It costs $$ to provide extra services. The only pressure I saw in 20+ years of teaching was to defer or deny.
November 24, 2025 at 2:49 PM
To me, the biggest problem with this article is that it equates ADHD and autism with being "unwell." That's ableist, and it undermines the author's argument (which I agree with) that schools' narrow criteria for what is "normal" contributes to psych diagnoses for students.
I don't think I've ever disagreed and agreed more strongly with a piece, seesawing from one paragraph to the next.

Will come back to dissect.

#GiftLink #GiftArticle
November 24, 2025 at 2:43 PM
Speaking as an educator (teacher and principal), what's frustrating about the piece is that it identifies a real problem - the rise of standardized testing under NCLB and then Race to the Top - which did tremendous damage to students for whom one size did not fit all, but then . . .

1/
November 24, 2025 at 2:42 PM
And now the leap back to over-diagnosing claims--w/o a meaningful, helpful discussion of how treating schools like businesses, teachers like floor supervisors, and students like little workers with narrow, specific "outcomes" to reach no mater what is contributing to the youth mental health crisis.
November 24, 2025 at 2:41 PM
A chunk where I'm hard agreeing. Pols brought competition into the schools, decided they should compete with each other, and set teachers and students to the task of cutthroat competition.
November 24, 2025 at 2:33 PM
Then we shift to a para on history. Here's a historian:
November 24, 2025 at 2:30 PM
The source of the thesis, it appears:
November 24, 2025 at 2:28 PM
WHAT

Beyond both-sidesing, now we're pretending that much of the legacy of NCLB and RTTT does not live on. The last part is the thesis, which is v confusing at this point.
November 24, 2025 at 2:23 PM
Yes, please, absolutely.
November 24, 2025 at 2:23 PM
I cheered at the first sentence and a half here...then groaned. So diagnosing disorders is bad? Yup. It's RFK Jr. time (and more generally the Trumpian if-we-don't count-it-it-don't count).
November 24, 2025 at 2:18 PM
A quick disclaimer that sets aside two of countless causes of the child mental health crisis, only one relatively new. So much ignored. The second para is in conflict with the first, because there is a national conversation re the effect of screen time in schools (though admittedly, quite late).
November 24, 2025 at 2:18 PM
Here RFK Jr.'s dreadful conspiracies are set neatly against a Dem governor's approach, equating them.
November 24, 2025 at 2:05 PM
Next comes the paragraph that says The NYTimes thinks it's found a new spot of potential bi-partisan agreement that facilitates both-sidesism and that will allow them to bash Dems. This will prove out later.
November 24, 2025 at 2:02 PM
Next few paragraphs include some data but also lots of hyperbole and a shockingly dismissive tone that suggests lots of kids are suffering from made-up conditions.
November 24, 2025 at 1:58 PM
Okay, the first paragraph: no.

None of what follows supports the contention of either "likely" or "never."

Also the passive voice here contradicts later statements about parents pushing for diagnoses.
November 24, 2025 at 1:55 PM
Absolutely.
November 24, 2025 at 1:47 PM
I haven't taught the class for almost a decade now, so there is nothing contemporary on the list
November 24, 2025 at 1:46 PM