Cool, cool. You bear no responsibility what you platform for your audience. Duly noted. Care more for style than substance. I got that too. And you are obviously butthurt, confirming my original mild criticism. But thanks for playing. Muting you now.
Okay, cool. How about spreading authoritarianism and food scarcity rather than policing speech? A reassessment of priorities may be in order here is all that I am suggesting.
One of the biggest hurdles in domestic violence is that men's aggressive behavior is normalized but is not "normal" or healthy. Women will experience this with most men & be told this is just how men express themselves. Theyre loud, "masculine," dominant. So we accept it at the expense of our nerves
Married a guy just like that. He won't change, ever. The only person you can control is yourself. Protect your child, leave if you have to. It may escalate over time.
So I don't know if reading comprehension is an issue, but the OP was talking about ordering state police to "protect" Chicago. Blocking you for being angry, obtuse, and willfully ignorant.
Okay, so I am still saying that Pritzker cannot tell the ING to just start firing. I agree that Dems need to act like the Constitution is under attack and they appear weak as fk. But we need a better plan than "get 'em!"
That is what I am saying.🙄 My point is that Pritzker cannot just order ING to fire on ICE or whatever force Trump orders in there. Arguing anything else is disingenuous.
