Marco Garofalo
@marcogarofalo.bsky.social
98 followers 120 following 22 posts
Senior economist @bankofengland PhD student @OxfordEconDept @UniofOxford ⚽️ Long-suffering AS Roma fan 🇮🇹🇳🇱🇪🇺🇬🇧 RTs ≠ endorsements, any views my own. Website: https://sites.google.com/view/marco-garofalo/home
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
marcogarofalo.bsky.social
📣📣📣 New paper out 📣📣📣
With Giovanni Rosso and Roger Vicquery, we study the interplay between financial sanctions and dollar dominance focusing on how post-2014 international lending to Russia de-dollarized ($⬇) in favour of a euroization (€⬆️) ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid...
🧵👇[1/10]

#EconSky
marcogarofalo.bsky.social
Link to paper w/ my amazing co-authors
Giovanni Rosso and Roger Vicquery
ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid...
ora.ox.ac.uk
marcogarofalo.bsky.social
Phenomenal #NBUNBPconference25 at National Bank of Ukraine. Presented our work on financial sanctions and USD dominance, focusing on how post-2014 international lending to Russia de-dollarized ($⬇) in favour of a euroization (€⬆️)
events.bank.gov.ua/ARConference...
Research Conference 2025
Research Conference NBU
events.bank.gov.ua
Reposted by Marco Garofalo
katjabego.bsky.social
On increasing the NATO spending norm to 5%: “Spending more is not about pleasing an audience of one, it is about protection a billion people.”

Mark Rutte at @chathamhouse.org
Reposted by Marco Garofalo
danielmcdowell.bsky.social
Fascinating new work linking financial sanctions to the dollar's use in Russia.
marcogarofalo.bsky.social
📣📣📣 New paper out 📣📣📣
With Giovanni Rosso and Roger Vicquery, we study the interplay between financial sanctions and dollar dominance focusing on how post-2014 international lending to Russia de-dollarized ($⬇) in favour of a euroization (€⬆️) ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid...
🧵👇[1/10]

#EconSky
Reposted by Marco Garofalo
marcogarofalo.bsky.social
📣📣📣 New paper out 📣📣📣
With Giovanni Rosso and Roger Vicquery, we study the interplay between financial sanctions and dollar dominance focusing on how post-2014 international lending to Russia de-dollarized ($⬇) in favour of a euroization (€⬆️) ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid...
🧵👇[1/10]

#EconSky
marcogarofalo.bsky.social
Specifically, our main innovation is to model sanctions as a currency-specific wedge on assets with different denominations. As US sanctions tighten the constraint on USD assets, financial intermediaries reallocate their portfolios towards other currencies.

[10/10]
marcogarofalo.bsky.social
We plug this insight into a novel 3-country 3-currency framework, where financial sanctions are financial frictions.

[9/10]
marcogarofalo.bsky.social
In other words: financial sanctions created a new currency-circuit-specific friction.

The risk of counterparts being cut off from the dollar payment system led to a rebalancing of portfolios towards the euro.

[8/10]
marcogarofalo.bsky.social
Why the euro? We argue that the threat of US extra-territorial sanctions targeting users of the USD international payment system increased “settlement risk” for USD transactions, relative to EUR.

[7/10]
marcogarofalo.bsky.social
Even more striking: the shift to euro lending happened regardless of the bank’s national jurisdiction, i.e. whether the ultimate parent was American, European/G7, or from a non-sanctioning country.

[6/10]
marcogarofalo.bsky.social
So, banks didn’t necessarily leave, but they changed currency …

[5/10]
marcogarofalo.bsky.social
We zoom in on the UK using confidential bank-level data, and show that most of the new euro lending came from the same banks that had decreased their USD lending: both banks that started lending in EUR (🟨👇), and those already lending in EUR which started to lend more
(🟦👇).

[4/10]
marcogarofalo.bsky.social
But this aggregate picture disguises a striking underlying fact: the share of cross-border lending to Russia in US dollars fell from 65% to 25%. Meanwhile, euro-denominated lending rose from 20% to 45%. (Source: BIS LBS)

How did that happen?

[3/10]
marcogarofalo.bsky.social
Following the 2014 invasion of Crimea and the imposition of financial sanctions on Russia, global cross-border lending to Russia declined significantly. (Source: BIS LBS)

[2/10]
marcogarofalo.bsky.social
📣📣📣 New paper out 📣📣📣
With Giovanni Rosso and Roger Vicquery, we study the interplay between financial sanctions and dollar dominance focusing on how post-2014 international lending to Russia de-dollarized ($⬇) in favour of a euroization (€⬆️) ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid...
🧵👇[1/10]

#EconSky
marcogarofalo.bsky.social
Fantastic 10th Annual West Coast Workshop in International Finance at Santa Clara last Friday. Huge thanks to Vito Cormun, Helen Popper, @sanjaysingh.bsky.social and all organisers!
Top research by colleagues and great to share the latest version of our paper on UK export dollarization post-Brexit.
Reposted by Marco Garofalo
thomsampson.bsky.social
Interested in how trade barriers affect firms?

New @voxeu.org column on our research on firm-level effects of Brexit on UK goods trade

Leaving single market and customs union reduced UK exports and imports

Smaller firms hardest hit: around 16,400 firms stopped exporting to EU because of TCA
voxeu.org
Dismantling deep integration has consequences for #trade. Brexit reduced worldwide UK #exports by 6.4% and worldwide #imports by at least 3.1%. Smaller firms suffered larger declines than large firms.
@marcogarofalo.bsky.social @thomsampson.bsky.social et al
cepr.org/voxeu/column...
#EconSky
Graphs of the estimated changes in firm trade with EU versus rest of the world following Brexit by firm size quintile. Smaller firms experienced a larger impact than large firms.

How does dismantling deep integration affect international trade? This column uses firm-level customs data to study the impact of Brexit on UK goods trade. The authors find that in the short term, exit from the Single Market and Customs Union reduced worldwide UK exports by 6.4% and worldwide imports by at least 3.1%. Importers partly compensated for lower EU imports by sourcing more from outside the EU, while exports to non-EU countries were unaffected. Moreover, smaller firms suffered larger declines in trade with the EU, whereas the largest firms did not experience a fall in exports.
Lookup fields should be configured in the field menu dropdown
Reposted by Marco Garofalo
voxeu.org
Dismantling deep integration has consequences for #trade. Brexit reduced worldwide UK #exports by 6.4% and worldwide #imports by at least 3.1%. Smaller firms suffered larger declines than large firms.
@marcogarofalo.bsky.social @thomsampson.bsky.social et al
cepr.org/voxeu/column...
#EconSky
Graphs of the estimated changes in firm trade with EU versus rest of the world following Brexit by firm size quintile. Smaller firms experienced a larger impact than large firms.

How does dismantling deep integration affect international trade? This column uses firm-level customs data to study the impact of Brexit on UK goods trade. The authors find that in the short term, exit from the Single Market and Customs Union reduced worldwide UK exports by 6.4% and worldwide imports by at least 3.1%. Importers partly compensated for lower EU imports by sourcing more from outside the EU, while exports to non-EU countries were unaffected. Moreover, smaller firms suffered larger declines in trade with the EU, whereas the largest firms did not experience a fall in exports.
Lookup fields should be configured in the field menu dropdown
Reposted by Marco Garofalo
sanjaysingh.bsky.social
We are looking forward to the 10th Annual West Coast Workshop in International Finance at Santa Clara University this Friday.

Program can be found here:

sanjayrajsingh.github.io/CFP/Agenda_W...
Reposted by Marco Garofalo
marcogarofalo.bsky.social
Really great to see our research on the impact of Brexit on UK trade featured in today’s @adamtooze.bsky.social Chartbook.