Marin K. Levy
@marinklevy.bsky.social
8.2K followers 330 following 440 posts
Professor of Law, Duke Law School; Academic Director of the Bolch Judicial Institute. Mother of sons & spinner of ⚖️🧵s.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Marin K. Levy
johnqbarrett.bsky.social
This is very good—it’s a true service to/must read for U.S. Judges, on their options as they decide cases about the legality of Executive actions.
marinklevy.bsky.social
TFW the great @smmarotta.bsky.social takes time out of his crazy busy schedule to teach your students about personal jurisdiction. Sean is a mensch and Civ Pro rockstar, and my students and I had the BEST time! ❤️

#appellatesky
smmarotta.bsky.social
When the plans get out of the DM and you actually go visit @marinklevy.bsky.social and her class. I had the BEST time.
Reposted by Marin K. Levy
smmarotta.bsky.social
When the plans get out of the DM and you actually go visit @marinklevy.bsky.social and her class. I had the BEST time.
marinklevy.bsky.social
We are *so* lucky to get to learn about Personal Jurisdiction with you! Sections 3 and 6 are in for the biggest treats (and I don’t just meant the donuts we will have on hand to celebrate your birthday!). 🍩
marinklevy.bsky.social
But what about the sharpie mustache? 🥸
Reposted by Marin K. Levy
joshuajfriedman.com
HAPPENING NOW: Judge Karin Immergut hears emergency arguments as California and Oregon seek to block President Trump's deployment of federalized California National Guard troops to Portland. 🧵
joshuajfriedman.com
NEW: Judge Immergut schedules a hearing TONIGHT, in 45 min, to hear arguments on SECOND TRO to block federalized California National Guard from deploying in Portland, Oregon. www.courtlistener.com/docket/71481...
SCHEDULING ORDER: This Court, having received Plaintiffs' Second Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and request for Expedited Hearing, ECF 59, sets a hearing by Telephonic Conference at 7:00 p.m. tonight, October 5, 2025, before Judge Karin J. Immergut. Access information for "LISTEN ONLY" phone number for the Hearing. Telephone Number: 1-571-353-2301 (toll-free 1-833-990-9400); Guest Meeting ID:
812-980-324#. Note: If dropped from the conference, please rejoin the conference. For complete conference connection instructions and etiquette guidelines, refer to ord.uscourts.gov/cms. Ordered on 10/5/25
by Judge Karin J. Immergut. (iy) (Entered: 10/05/2025)
Reposted by Marin K. Levy
stevevladeck.bsky.social
The very first statute authorizing domestic use of the military during domestic emergencies, enacted in 1792 by a Congress full of the same folks who wrote and ratified the Constitution, expressly provided for judicial review in certain circumstances *before* the President could even send troops.
marinklevy.bsky.social
The very best Bunny of all! ❤️
marinklevy.bsky.social
We almost went home with this one (Marin!) but I think Sonia Soto-meow-r wouldn’t be so happy to have a leporine companion . . .
marinklevy.bsky.social
“ . . . which may explain why it has been more than a century since a branch of our government has made as concerted an effort as the Executive Branch now makes to deny Americans their birthright.”

storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
storage.courtlistener.com
marinklevy.bsky.social
Chief Judge David Barron of the First Circuit Court of Appeals on birthright citizenship —

“[T]he length of our analysis should not be mistaken for a sign that the fundamental question that these cases raise about the scope of birthright citizenship is a difficult one. It is not . . .”
marinklevy.bsky.social
Grateful to be participating in this timely symposium next week: "Judicial Review in Jeopardy?"
Reposted by Marin K. Levy
jamalgreene.bsky.social
As @genevievelakier.bsky.social notes, this scheme is squarely unconstitutional under existing cases. There's some tricky nuance in the doctrine, but the thrust is that the government may not condition receipt of federal funds on ideological agreement with the government (or on refusing to speak).
genevievelakier.bsky.social
The admin’s efforts to get universities to agree to a list of demands in exchange for preferential access to federal funding isn’t just “troubling” as Ted Mitchell, prez of the @aceducation.bsky.social says in this article; it looks blatantly unconstitutional.🧵
www.wsj.com/us-news/educ...
www.wsj.com
Reposted by Marin K. Levy
rickpildes.bsky.social
At NYU's Democracy Project (more on that later), Prof. Caleb Nelson has a feature essay arguing that originalism does not support the unitary executive branch theory. Caleb is one of the country's leading originalist scholars, frequently cited by the Court.

democracyproject.org/posts/must-a...
Special Feature: Must Administrative Officers Serve at the President’s Pleasure?
A broad range of views on democracy to help break the stalemate caused by partisan conflict.
democracyproject.org