Marion Campbell
@marionkcampbell.bsky.social
950 followers 180 following 210 posts
Trialist; Methodologist; Statistician; Professor of Health Services Research; University of Aberdeen. Views my own. Hebridean. https://www.abdn.ac.uk/people/m.k.campbell
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Marion Campbell
richardhooper.bsky.social
I'm doing a webinar in two weeks (15 Oct 1-2pm BST), part of NIHR Research Support Service's Methods Academy series, on the age-old question: should I do a stepped wedge trial?

Free registration, details here: tinyurl.com/z6cjvce3

@nihr-rss.bsky.social @wiphcem.bsky.social @qmul-wiph.bsky.social
Reposted by Marion Campbell
bristol-csr.bsky.social
Excellent three days in Bristol as part of the #BOASTiC (Bristol Oxford Aberdeen Surgical Trials Course). We've enjoyed the in-depth look at surgical trials with delegates designing their own studies by the end of the 3rd day! @marionkcampbell.bsky.social @situ-oxford.bsky.social
Reposted by Marion Campbell
glbryson.bsky.social
Great #MethodologyMonday post on assessing acceptability in a pilot trial. Highlights the MRC complex intervention framework that AIMS Periop has used in its frailty research.
marionkcampbell.bsky.social
One of the key things to address when undertaking a feasibility study ahead of a trial is the acceptability of different aspects of the proposed trial (intervention, trial processes, proposed outcomes etc) to all relevant parties 1/7
#MethodologyMonday #125
marionkcampbell.bsky.social
The measure can help highlight how an intervention may need to be improved ahead of full evaluation 7/7
marionkcampbell.bsky.social
Constructs include affective attitude (how someone feels about the intervention), burden, ethicality, intervention coherence (understanding of how the intervention works), opportunity costs, perceived effectiveness, & self-efficacy (one’s confidence that they can use it). 6/7
marionkcampbell.bsky.social
Assessment of acceptability can be explored through multiple approaches eg via qualitative interviews or focus groups, via questionnaires or via proxy measures eg consent rates 4/7
marionkcampbell.bsky.social
The MRC complex intervention framework gives a useful summary of the range of people whose views should be considered. It also encourages adopting a diverse approach. 3/7
See www.bmj.com/content/374/...
marionkcampbell.bsky.social
This is particularly the case when planning for the evaluation of complex interventions as they are often multi-faceted and involve/impact many different parties (including at patient, professional and system levels) 2/7
marionkcampbell.bsky.social
One of the key things to address when undertaking a feasibility study ahead of a trial is the acceptability of different aspects of the proposed trial (intervention, trial processes, proposed outcomes etc) to all relevant parties 1/7
#MethodologyMonday #125
Reposted by Marion Campbell
bonejointjournal.bsky.social
The use of Bayesian methods in the design of trials and the analysis of the findings provides several potential benefits, which may be particularly applicable in Trauma & Orthopaedic surgery.

#ClinicalTrials #BayesianStatistics #RCTs #OrthoSky
@docfarrow.bsky.social

ow.ly/xeXm50WRwZN
The Bone & Joint Journal.
Extract from article titled 'Clinical trials in Trauma and Orthopaedics: time to think Bayesian?'
marionkcampbell.bsky.social
This👇 …. often unseen but crucial role
ukcrc-ctu.org.uk
Statisticians are central to patient safety in clinical trials.

From designing stopping rules to monitoring adverse events, we ensure risks are detected early - protecting participants while maintaining trial integrity.

🔗 ukcrc-ctu.org.uk

#Statistics #UKCTUNetwork #WorldPatientSafetyDay2025
Reposted by Marion Campbell
iwashyna.bsky.social
Monday wisdom
raulpachecovega.bsky.social
“You can always edit a bad page. You can't edit a blank page.”
― Jodi Picoult

#WritingSky #AcademicSky
marionkcampbell.bsky.social
📣FUNDING ALERT: The NIHR/MRC Better Methods Better Research Programme has three new calls open:
- Researcher-Led
- Methodology for the incorporation of health and environmental impacts in health/social care
- Guidance development

Closing 2nd Dec
See: www.nihr.ac.uk/funding-oppo...
marionkcampbell.bsky.social
A recent paper in the BMJ (by Ying et al) is a good read - with worked examples, tables and code to help calculate an appropriate pilot sample size. It also stresses the importance of aligning sample sizes with the objectives of the pilot study 6/6
www.bmj.com/content/bmj/...
marionkcampbell.bsky.social
There are a number of papers outlining approaches to pilot study sample size calculations - from rules of thumb (eg Julious) to ones based on estimating precision of standard deviations eg Sim & Lewis 5/6
Julious: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/...
Sim & Lewis: www.jclinepi.com/article/S089...
marionkcampbell.bsky.social
Uncertainties may include estimating likely recruitment rates, rates of consent, follow up and so on … so the approach to sample size is generally about estimation and precision not significance testing 3/6
marionkcampbell.bsky.social
It is first important to stress that pilot and feasibility studies are *not* about detecting intervention effects. They are about exploring key uncertainties ahead of the main trial 2/6
marionkcampbell.bsky.social
I seem to have been discussing pilot and feasibility studies a lot this week. One question often asked is how big should my pilot/feasibility study be? 1/6
#MethodologyMonday #124
Reposted by Marion Campbell
ace-aberdeen.bsky.social
We are co-authors on 2 new papers in @bonejointjournal.bsky.social - one on the potential of Bayesian trials in T&O and a Bayesian reanalysis of the WHiTE8 trial.
And … our own Jemma Hudson is the featured author 😊
@docfarrow.bsky.social
@marionkcampbell.bsky.social

Links to papers below 👇