Such a terrible idea to replace a bad metric with a potentially worse one. Based on assumptions that every field treats author order in the same way + every order means same thing. Metrification made worse :( + discouraging collaborations.
October 26, 2025 at 5:04 AM
Such a terrible idea to replace a bad metric with a potentially worse one. Based on assumptions that every field treats author order in the same way + every order means same thing. Metrification made worse :( + discouraging collaborations.
We didn't, in fact, this research started with our previous project, trying to break AI detectors with Pangram being the only one not failing. Since then, we have experimented with it, and it does an extremely good job. (Some plots in the paper show it well, like fig8 with historical data)
October 23, 2025 at 4:16 PM
We didn't, in fact, this research started with our previous project, trying to break AI detectors with Pangram being the only one not failing. Since then, we have experimented with it, and it does an extremely good job. (Some plots in the paper show it well, like fig8 with historical data)