Matthew Holehouse
@matthewholehouse.bsky.social
30K followers 520 following 1.3K posts
British political correspondent at The Economist. Comment journalist of the year, British Journalism Awards 2023.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
matthewholehouse.bsky.social
Notable how very little mention Badenoch gives in her speech to the man who is feasting on the Tories. The only reference: "Whether it’s Starmer, Farage, Corbyn or Davey all these men are shaking the same magic money tree."
matthewholehouse.bsky.social
Conservative background note on stamp duty talks up the productivity benefits of increased labour mobility from a more fluid housing market. Which is both true and a welcome escape from the anti-mobility logic that took hold under Johnson
matthewholehouse.bsky.social
"We need bold ideas, a positive vision for our country and a plan to deliver it." A chatbpt leadership bid of a speech this
matthewholehouse.bsky.social
One of those speeches where "Britain" is used when "We, the incumbent government," would be more accurate.
rmcunliffe.bsky.social
"While Britain was redefining what a woman is, China was building five nuclear reactors," says Kemi Badenoch.

I cannot be the only person curious about how these two things are related
matthewholehouse.bsky.social
Jenrick channeling Keats and Housman. Things must be serious
matthewholehouse.bsky.social
Among many the missed opportunities to draw a line under the last administration, the shadow cabinet's determination to cling to Rwanda - an unpopular scheme that had become a logistical millstone around the party's neck - is among the oddest.
sundersays.bsky.social
Priti Patel & Chris Philp are sharing a panel with a former Greek minister but the billed Rwandan government speaker is not here
matthewholehouse.bsky.social
An irony that a party agitated by the “rule of lawyers” is outsourcing its thinking on issues of statecraft to a lawyer who has given a pretty narrow and technical answer
matthewholehouse.bsky.social
There is the tension. Badenoch’s argument yesterday was that she had kicked the question to Wolfson and he had given the answer to leave. But his report doesn’t imply that: it says that all the big questions around ECHR are political and therefore for her to take.
matthewholehouse.bsky.social
Similarly: the consequences for Northern Ireland are ultimately political questions not legal ones
matthewholehouse.bsky.social
Wolfson’s advice on which Badenoch relied to announce ECHR withdrawal: it’s possible this results in parts of the EU TCA being terminated, but it’s a political question
matthewholehouse.bsky.social
The very same ! They are Her clothes
matthewholehouse.bsky.social
Been to Manchester central complex many times for conferences and rarely has the main hall been so light on outside exhibitors. Lots of padding with empty stands put up by central party
matthewholehouse.bsky.social
Full Northern Ireland passage on ECHR from Badenoch's speech
matthewholehouse.bsky.social
Flashbacks to the last Sunday night conference speech by a Tory leader: Oct 2016. The same combination of panicked base-pleasing policy maximalism and "details, details" handwaving about the consequences of that policy in Northern Ireland.
matthewholehouse.bsky.social
Shadow NI secretary Alex Burghart has been tasked with "union wide implementation" of ECHR withdrawal in Northern Ireland, says Badenoch, so as to have a "clear, thorough and robust plan" and a "orderly and respectful process." On NI, she says: "Difficulties are not a reason to avoid action".
matthewholehouse.bsky.social
Renouncing ECHR and repealing ECHR means that Britons will not lose "any of the rights we cherish" because they are a function of common law. Only "spurious claims" by immigrants will go. Everything will change; nothing will change.
matthewholehouse.bsky.social
Badenoch's argument that Reform's ECHR denouncement policy is rushed and not thought through, whereas her ECHR denouncement policy is based on 200 pages of legal advice ("so forensic, so thorough") may fall down on the fact that the end-point of those policies is identical.
matthewholehouse.bsky.social
Badenoch's intro video is scenes from the Robinson march interspersed with footage of migrant boats.
matthewholehouse.bsky.social
I dont think that’s true, or a nice thing to say
matthewholehouse.bsky.social
“I’m tired of us asking all these irrelevant questions about where they should go… this is a fatalistic and defeatist attitude.” Badenoch on her scheme for mass deportations
Reposted by Matthew Holehouse
hetanshah.bsky.social
‘The average man travelled 8,245 miles in 2002 and 6,549 miles in 2024—a drop of 21%. Almost the entire fall was caused by a decline in driving.’ Such an interesting piece
economist.com/britain/2025...
British men are driving less, and a culture is vanishing
Farewell to the road warriors
economist.com
matthewholehouse.bsky.social
Shades of Starmer in the new Archbishop of Canterbury's CV, in having reached tthe top of two separate vocations consecutively