Matt Rosoff
@mattrosoff.bsky.social
Editor-in-Chief of The Register
https://www.theregister.com/Author/Matt-Rosoff/
https://www.theregister.com/Author/Matt-Rosoff/
Absolutely! I’ve never seen anybody on the internet appreciate that movie before. Formative when I was 19. Now - do you know “Oh Lucky Man”? Not similar, but had a similar effect. Worth a view.
November 10, 2025 at 6:24 AM
Absolutely! I’ve never seen anybody on the internet appreciate that movie before. Formative when I was 19. Now - do you know “Oh Lucky Man”? Not similar, but had a similar effect. Worth a view.
Gets back to the recent study k saw (sorry don’t remember citation) that says GenAI is best used for functions where inaccuracy isn’t very important. Great for low-value “content.”
November 9, 2025 at 7:18 PM
Gets back to the recent study k saw (sorry don’t remember citation) that says GenAI is best used for functions where inaccuracy isn’t very important. Great for low-value “content.”
Reposted by Matt Rosoff
Paradoxically, ChatGPT (with a careful prompt) explains the difference between the two systems much better than @nytimes.com's reporters did (below 1 of 2). +
November 9, 2025 at 2:39 PM
Paradoxically, ChatGPT (with a careful prompt) explains the difference between the two systems much better than @nytimes.com's reporters did (below 1 of 2). +