I realized this one didn't tile correctly after the second ring when I looked back at the picture.

I should say almost identical, I need to change placement rules to make it exactly the same.

C# is Microsoft flavor Java. Unity does use C#.

I write mine in python or c# depending on the computer I'm working on.

To be a pedant, RFTG having 7 options has a pretty dramatic change in how two options are triggered even though they are the same outcome for the non-activating players.

Somehow we all learned about the Missingno glitch through one friend at a sleepover, we had only ever seen Mew from promotional stuff, & I remember one friend corrupted their Hall of Fame, & we got to see Mew there & hear the cry & it might as well have been a religious moment for us 8 year olds.

The trick to eating cabbage is to never stop eating cabbage.

Looks like he wants to be a dentist.

You're right none of it changes what he said or did. It is worth repeating that nothing he said, as despicable as it may have been, even approaches being murdered over it.

Seeing people I personally know openly cheer about the murder is painting my opinion on the need to be explicit.

Saying you need to radicalize people in response to a radical murder and then talk about the hurt caused by Kirk, intentionally or otherwise reads like the intent is to justify the murder because the things he said are also violent.

If it's intentional, that's not okay. I hope it's just clumsiness.

I said I think people need to be very specific about what they mean because a lot of people are using this exact rhetoric to justify it, and pretending to be coy about it.
There's no reason to leave anything up to interpretation by people because you decided to be imprecise in your language.

I think it's fair to dislike Kirk and never want to associate with him, but there are a ton of responses on here and Reddit that are openly gleeful about the event, couched in very similar language.

It's important to be precise about exactly what you mean for that very reason.

Some people might be mad at me for "tone policing" but I think it's necessary when you have some people playing coy about a literal murder and using plausible deniability to justify it, especially with how many have been brazen about their support of the murder.

I don't think (or at least hope) that's not what Eric is doing, but seeing comments like his that end with "and I'm glad he's dead" are enough for me to feel like I need to try and be a cooler head (even if I'm a relative nobody).

I am aware of that, I have personally seen multiple people who I know in real life, as well as accounts I (now used to) follow here that were explicitly cheering on the murder using much of the same language in this thread, and it was a serious reality check for me.

I don't know how you can come to that conclusion of your first point while rejecting that there is a culture present on the left that conflates his speech with tangible violence and affirms the violent action taken against him, especially on this site.

Agreed on your last point. Have a nice day.