Maya Sen
@mayasen.bsky.social
20K followers 400 following 1.1K posts
Professor, Harvard Kennedy School | Speaking in a personal capacity | https://msen.scholars.harvard.edu/
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
mayasen.bsky.social
SCOTUS “eliminating Section 2, a provision that prohibits racial gerrymandering when it dilutes minority voting power, would let Republicans redraw up to 19 House seats to favor the party and crush minority representation in Congress”

www.politico.com/news/2025/10...
Republicans could draw 19 more House seats after an upcoming Supreme Court ruling
Many experts are forecasting the end of a key provision of election law — enabling Republicans to shore up their advantage in the House, according to a new report.
www.politico.com
Reposted by Maya Sen
daveweigel.bsky.social
The View segment where Whoopi asked how ordinary people could read SCOTUS opinions was revealing.

They're free. They're online. They're much easier to read than legislation. Conquer your imposter's syndrome, you are smart enough to read a decision and know if it's bullshit.
tomscocca.bsky.social
It's not just that they're going to strike down a law against conversion therapy, it's that they're going to do it on behalf of made-up claims from a straw plaintiff who can't honestly show the law affected her at all
tomscocca.bsky.social
One thing about American's widespread distrust and disapproval of the Supreme Court is that mainstream news coverage mostly doesn't dwell on stuff like standing, so people don't even begin to grasp how rigged the Court truly is www.nytimes.com/live/2025/10...
Reposted by Maya Sen
fishkin.bsky.social
The collective action that thee nine universities need to take is to unequivocally reject the compact.

Danielle Allen, who is a wonderful and thoughtful person, seems to be imagining possibilities for good faith negotiations here that plainly do not exist. The government does not share her goal.
profmarylewis.bsky.social
Danielle Allen has proposed many good things for Harvard, so I’m puzzled by her reading of the word “compact” here, as if this would be an agreement freely entered into. She rightly says that, as written, this shouldn’t be agreed to. Maybe leave it there? therenovator.substack.com/p/why-im-exc...
Why I’m Excited About the White House’s Proposal for a Higher Ed Compact
Now we have a chance for collective action
therenovator.substack.com
mayasen.bsky.social
She’s doing a lot of work throughout the piece to give the administration the benefit of the doubt

Ignores similar ideological attacks on law firms, private businessss, and political adversaries that together paint a very different picture l
mayasen.bsky.social
Universities should at some point step in to articulate a positive vision of higher ed & scientific research to our fellow countrymen

But that cannot be done under coercion
mayasen.bsky.social
She says this version should be rejected as executive overreach in favor of negotiations with Congress along similar lines

Which assumes universities will be taken seriously as negotiators by a benevolent Congress on a basis free from coercion

Not sure how you realistically get there from here?
mayasen.bsky.social
It’s immediately pragmatic and so good for someone in university leadership?
mayasen.bsky.social
Has the old post-World War II compact between universities and the government collapsed? Yes

Do we need a new one? Yes

Is this that moment? I don’t think so

Neither the executive nor Congress have a coherent theory for promoting scientific research or higher ed reforms beyond ideological ones
mayasen.bsky.social
Agree with @profmarylewis.bsky.social - very puzzling piece that assumes a good faith operations by the executive and eventually by Congress, and also assumes that higher education and research are seen as societally good by these relevant players

Also ignores the issue of govt coercion
profmarylewis.bsky.social
Danielle Allen has proposed many good things for Harvard, so I’m puzzled by her reading of the word “compact” here, as if this would be an agreement freely entered into. She rightly says that, as written, this shouldn’t be agreed to. Maybe leave it there? therenovator.substack.com/p/why-im-exc...
Why I’m Excited About the White House’s Proposal for a Higher Ed Compact
Now we have a chance for collective action
therenovator.substack.com
mayasen.bsky.social
Puzzling take indeed

While she thoughtfully argues for a different, legislative-driven process where university have a say, that is not the reality of the situation!
mayasen.bsky.social
Same thought but it was mom and tote bag
mayasen.bsky.social
“It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.”
Reposted by Maya Sen
radleybalko.bsky.social
Jesus. You think it can’t get any worse, then you read these stories. US citizens and legal residents illegally arrested and held for days. **Native Americans** getting detained and held for days because ICE agents are too stupid/racist to know about tribal IDs.
mayasen.bsky.social
Right, of course

(I’m definitely feeling like i need to brush up on 1A case law right now!)
mayasen.bsky.social
Isn’t this unconstitutional under the cursing cheerleader case?
Reposted by Maya Sen
blakeprof.bsky.social
UC Academic Council letter to UC Regents and President calling on them to “reject governmental demands that compromise institutional integrity and academic freedom.”

Personally, I’d say reject all demands, since the demands are being made unlawfully.
mayasen.bsky.social
single handedly the most embarrassing quote I’ve seen from a university official this year, and that’s saying a lot
mayasen.bsky.social
Oh yeah I’m sure

Very embarrassing for him, even if he doesn’t know it
mayasen.bsky.social
Genuinely feel badly for this person
mayasen.bsky.social
Big failure in reporting here to not put the obvious First Amendment problems front and center

That implies that the government can somehow “just do this” and normalizes unconstitutional government action

Pretty sick of this!

www.nytimes.com/2025/10/02/u...
Trump Offered Universities an Invitation for a Deal. Some See a Trap.
www.nytimes.com
mayasen.bsky.social
Exactly

Not just this but it asks universities to *punish* speech that “belittles” “conservative ideas”

😵‍💫
mayasen.bsky.social
You are “belittling a conservative idea”, Ben
mayasen.bsky.social
Straight up asking public universities to set up governing structures to violate the first amendment