If the objective was public safety, the response was perverse. The outcome was entirely predictable. It was about control not public safety. The police conditions were designed in a way that made failure likely. You can’t lawfully disperse a crowd that you have physically prevented from dispersing.

If the objective was public safety, the response was perverse. The outcome was entirely predictable. It was about control not public safety. The police conditions were designed in a way that made failure likely. You can’t lawfully disperse a crowd that you have physically prevented from dispersing.

While they’re at it they can ask how is it that “Antisemitism here in Australia is not a Jewish problem. It is an Australian problem.” Herzog

I’d find it very, very surprising if a large cohort of people didn’t support her.

The petrodollar arose from a US–Saudi deal in the 1970s, long after Nazism, and had nothing to do with Islamist or Zionist ideology. BRICS dedollarisation is real but driven by sanctions risk and monetary sovereignty, not an ideological struggle against “fascism.”

This claim isn’t historically accurate. Control of fossil fuels has been exercised by empires, monarchies, liberal democracies, communist states, and corporations, not “fascists” as a category.

I don’t normal respond to the sobriquet “Princess” however in this encounter as it is used as an insult, I will. I was referring to Chevron, Exxon Mobil, Alcoa, Tronox, Energy Fuels, even BHP is 73% owned by US investors. Are you saying these companies are Zionist controlled?

Australia has already abdicated core aspects of its sovereignty to the US resources industry.