We’d be honored and we’ll be there!😊

Thank you! We thought it was needed in the current landscape and we’re excited to collaborate with creators!

George Lakoff and I pushed this simple and reasonable idea years ago. When I returned to journalism, I realized the problem. Editors care more about SEO and controversy (=clicks) than about whether the headline is destroying truth. Incentive is to bait engagement at all cost.

I'm worried that there are some things slipping through (or soon to) as: LLM-generated manuscript, goes to editor using LLM to summarize, goes to reviewers using LLM to review, and not a single bit of the whole process is done by a human, is actual science, or is useful at all.

You all ate and left no crumbs!