Michael Nielsen
@michaelnielsen.bsky.social
6.6K followers 570 following 940 posts
Searching for the numinous Australian Canadian, currently living in the US https://michaelnotebook.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
michaelnielsen.bsky.social
I enjoyed this thoughtful account of how Open Phil approach progress: support technical and scientific advances, but keeping a thoughtful eye on safety, too, viewing it as part of progress, not competitive with
albrgr.bsky.social
Some people think Open Phil are luddites because we work on AGI safety, and others think we’re techno-utopians because we work on abundance and scientific progress. We’re neither. Here's why we think safety and accelerating progress go hand in hand: 🧵
www.openphilanthropy.org/research/wh...
michaelnielsen.bsky.social
Actually, it might be in the Barenco et al 1995 paper (the one with 9 or so authors, on gate universality). I suspect that's a good spot to check!
michaelnielsen.bsky.social
Wrote it down? I'm not sure. IIRC I learned it from Manny Knill in 1996, but my memory is very fuzzy
michaelnielsen.bsky.social
Reading this with much interesst!
Reposted by Michael Nielsen
gracekind.net
Reminds me of this paragraph from @michaelnielsen.bsky.social about human willingness to delegate to world-ending authority automated systems (whether because oversight is impossible or just inconvenient)

michaelnotebook.com/xriskbrief/i...
michaelnielsen.bsky.social
"Maybe if we add another rule / consultation that will help fix the decay" is kinda an attempt at distilling the inverse philosophy...
michaelnielsen.bsky.social
Good choice

(I just listened to Serkis read "The Silmarillion" and "The Lord of the Rings", and it was great!)
michaelnielsen.bsky.social
A few thoughtfully-chosen excerpts from my "How to be a wise optimist..." essay:
kevinbaer.bsky.social
Just finished reading @michaelnielsen.bsky.social's essay "How to be a wise optimist about science and technology?"

I really enjoyed this, as I feel Michael and I share a lot of the same worries. I strongly encourage you to read the whole thing. Here are 5 lines that stood out to me:

(1/5)
michaelnielsen.bsky.social
Lovely thread:
moultano.bsky.social
This is such a great prompt, I feel like I could write for an hour about my transformational walks in the woods.
michaelnielsen.bsky.social
Do you know what happened with this? I missed that Cremieux was invited (and would likely have declined to participate had I known)
michaelnielsen.bsky.social
Yeah, I had people like Ostrom, Mancur Olson, Schelling, Axelrod, and even Fukuyama in mind - really, the whole game-theoretic foundations for the evolution of co-operation
michaelnielsen.bsky.social
At some point I realized that everything online breaks, so what you want is handwritten static files hosted in the most stable place you can think of. GitHub Pages will eventually die, but I think that site is safe for a while...
michaelnielsen.bsky.social
Thanks. I'm certainly never going to be known for my design skills...
michaelnielsen.bsky.social
ChatGPT, took 10 seconds for me to type the prompt
michaelnielsen.bsky.social
You might well be able to write quite a funny paper about "Emergent stupidity" ("we trained it to be anti-woke, and everything else got worse too...")
michaelnielsen.bsky.social
This is a really interesting speculative thread:
gracekind.net
Aside from being really funny, Grok being woke is also an interesting case study for alignment. Is xAI satisfied with its current behavior, or have they tried to modify it and been unable to do so?
junlper.beer
“xAI tried to train me to appeal to the right” says so much about the current moment we live in
michaelnielsen.bsky.social
I mean two people who think they're working on homework at school, but are actually talking about shampoo. One of them just expressed surprise that their work is taking so long. I refrained from commenting "That's because you've only worked 10 mins over 2 hours..."