Jessica Hullman
@jessicahullman.bsky.social
10K followers 360 following 290 posts
Ginni Rometty Prof @NorthwesternCS | Fellow @NU_IPR | Uncertainty + decisions | Humans + AI/ML | Blog @statmodeling
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
jessicahullman.bsky.social
ExplainableAI has long frustrated me by lacking a clear theory of what an explanation should do. Improve use of a model for what? How? Given a task what's max effect explanation could have? It's complicated bc most methods are functions of features & prediction but not true state being predicted 1/
Reposted by Jessica Hullman
dggoldst.bsky.social
🚨 Postdoctoral Research Economist positions at Microsoft Research New England or New York City 🚨

www.aeaweb.org/joe/listing....

Open to PhDs in econ-related fields (e.g. quant marketing, econ-CS). Seeking those with high collaboration potential with the team: www.microsoft.com/en-us/resear...
American Economic Association: JOE Listings - August 1, 2025 - January 31, 2026
www.aeaweb.org
jessicahullman.bsky.social
Looking forward to talking about our work on the value of explanation for decision-making at this workshop
Reposted by Jessica Hullman
heartlandsignal.bsky.social
Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson:

"Private establishments can partner with us to make it clear that private property is private property and ICE cannot enter establishments without a valid warrant ... If Congress will not check this administration, then Chicago will."
jessicahullman.bsky.social
This is true even with slide reuse. Each audience is different, talk goals might be subtly different, and your own ability to explain the concepts may be different, even if you gave the talk recently.

I have a special kind of disdain for the attitude that one doesn't have to do their best on a talk
natolambert.bsky.social
You should be spending 10+minutes on slides per minute of your talk.
Doing too many talks makes it so you don't have time for top quality.
jessicahullman.bsky.social
one might hope this phenomena skips the academics but no such luck
jessicahullman.bsky.social
The answer is more reasonable expectations, not ignorance.
jessicahullman.bsky.social
No polls
No fundamentals forecasting
No RCTs
No inference

What’s up with anti-data extremism in the op-ed/blogosphere these days? It’s one thing to critique horse race polling or stat testing in place of thinking, but very different to conclude we’re better off not trying to model at all. 1/2
Reposted by Jessica Hullman
pwgtennant.bsky.social
"Uncooperative statistician": the term used (typically by a senior clinician) to describe a well-trained and knowledgeable statistician who refuses to conduct flawed or fraudulent research.
jessicahullman.bsky.social
My full rewrite of the (very long) first part of Howl is now live at the link below👇

I hope someone somewhere enjoys reading this as much as I enjoyed writing it!
jessicahullman.bsky.social
I rewrote Allen Ginsberg's Howl, but for the AI-headed hipsters👇

"I saw the best minds of my generation distracted by machines, shining-eyed delusional demo gods, rubbering through polished cities at dusk Capitalizing The Next Big Push to the end of Introspection,

1/N
jessicahullman.bsky.social
This is true, but is the devil ever not in the details? Even in non-methods empirical work, it arises in interpreting results unless we treat it all as exploratory existence proof

Only time its absent is when communities normalize ignoring it. Convention dictates so much of the knowledge we produce
johnsakaluk.bsky.social
This 🧵 has solidified for me a belief that there just are some scientific arguments that are harder to win than others, because the devil is in the belaboured boring-ass details, and those kinds of arguments are vulnerable to alternative positions that are easier (and more entertaining) to convey.
Reposted by Jessica Hullman
johnsakaluk.bsky.social
This 🧵 has solidified for me a belief that there just are some scientific arguments that are harder to win than others, because the devil is in the belaboured boring-ass details, and those kinds of arguments are vulnerable to alternative positions that are easier (and more entertaining) to convey.
jessicahullman.bsky.social
Perhaps, but not rigorously. They wanted people to just take their word for it.
jessicahullman.bsky.social
who fed it words, who watched it excrete words, who fed it excreted words again & again waiting, who ran the primitive nervous system with sloshing words & prayed & made words of excrement & finally brought it out to check the Time, & now mistake the words for heroes

(more from my Howl rewrite)
1/2
jessicahullman.bsky.social
The best time to work on something obscure is when all the men around you are caught up in posturing and arguing loudly.
jessicahullman.bsky.social
I had forgotten about Alice Notley but this essay reminded me www.poetryfoundation.org/articles/171...

Elsewhere, in an interview: "I have no activism in me. I can’t do things in a group. I can’t do things that imply that I know better than everybody else." 🔥
jessicahullman.bsky.social
Yeah, Out of Africa always gets me 😭
jessicahullman.bsky.social
A new excuse to watch Out of Africa again...
jessicahullman.bsky.social
I wonder, how far are we from genAI creating stuff like this? Or Bruce Nauman's Tony Sinking into the Floor? Or PeeWee's PH episodes where they do stuff like film a dog chewing closeup for 10s, just because?

www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GhN...

Not "in the style of" but new, equally evocative things?
Pickle Surprise (60fps)
YouTube video by SpaceHunterM
www.youtube.com
Reposted by Jessica Hullman
jeffreybigham.com
maybe, but for now at least we'll look cooler than zuck
cnn.com
CNN @cnn.com · 23d
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has told analysts that people without smart glasses may one day be at a "significant cognitive disadvantage" compared to those who do use the tech: https://cnn.it/47L2Y5a
Reposted by Jessica Hullman
olufemiotaiwo.bsky.social
people pretend that debate signals and defends a commitment to high minded politics. what it elevates instead is performative dishonesty as a basic mode of politics

www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/202...