Michał Klincewicz
@michalk.bsky.social
25 followers 23 following 7 posts
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
michalk.bsky.social
Here rdcu.be/es8A1 we respond to the recent (unfair) editorial in Nature about recent criticisms of IIT theory of consciousness. We keep fighting for transparent and serious science. @hakwan.bsky.social @felipedebrigard.bsky.social @deanbuono.bsky.social
Adversarial collaborations: all theories must be subject to critical evaluation | Nature
Letter to the Editor
rdcu.be
michalk.bsky.social
Can you imagine? If that happens I suggest we throw a slopaganda party somewhere near Tesla headquarters :D
Reposted by Michał Klincewicz
markalfano.bsky.social
new preprint available!

Trust from Mistrust: When is Trust Rationally Justified?

Co-authors @michalk.bsky.social @stevebland.bsky.social @robert-m-ross.bsky.social

osf.io/preprints/ps...

Drawing on insights from Nietzsche's Human All-too-human, we develop a framework for wisely placing trust 🧵
OSF
osf.io
Reposted by Michał Klincewicz
nielsmede.bsky.social
Out now in Nature Human Behaviour: Our 68-country #survey on public attitudes to #science 📣
It shows: People still #trust scientists and support an active role of scientists in society and policy-making. #OpenAccess available here: www.nature.com/articles/s41... @natureportfolio.bsky.social
(1/13)
michalk.bsky.social
Such a cool paper and study! Very excited to see Grimes getting the attention he deserves. One thing I would like to see with this study is more analysis of eye movements. If you are game let me know and I'd happily get our lab involved--we just finished some decision blindness experiments.
Reposted by Michał Klincewicz
brianodegaard.bsky.social
Excited to share this new empirical work funded by @templetonworld.bsky.social, replicating & extending the work of John Grimes on change blindness during saccades: osf.io/preprints/ps...

It was a full team effort across two labs, with important contributions from proponents of HOT & IIT
OSF
osf.io
Reposted by Michał Klincewicz
kordinglab.bsky.social
I tend to give small emerging fields the benefit of the doubt. So folks may ask me why I speak out strongly against IIT. I do so because it is neither small nor emerging any more and moved from ideation to scale up essentially without any convincing evidence.
michalk.bsky.social
@deanbuono.bsky.social I worry that this pivot to physics will lend plausibility to the idea that Giulio Tononi is like Einstein, IIT is like general relativity, and the critics of IIT are like 100 angry 'establishment' tribunals signing letters against. Astrology is a better analogy imo
deanbuono.bsky.social
The most succinct reason I think IIT is pseudoscience is that you can't propose a new law of physics without bothering to check if it's consistent with the existing laws. Physics is an incomplete puzzle, which does not mean you can make up new pieces willy-nilly.
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
What makes a theory of consciousness unscientific? - Nature Neuroscience
Theories of consciousness have a long and controversial history. One well-known proposal — integrated information theory — has recently been labeled as ‘pseudoscience’, which has caused a heated open ...
www.nature.com