Michelle Quist
@michellequist.bsky.social
730 followers 400 following 360 posts
Opinion and legal writer. Attorney. Mother of 7. Involved in law/politics for over 25 years. Failed 3rd-party candidate for Utah Attorney General with +100k votes. Chair, Forward Party of Utah.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
michellequist.bsky.social
👇👇👇 Unaffiliated or a member of a third party in Utah? Too bad. You don't count in Utah. #utpol
alanwessman.bsky.social
Utah’s supermajority party doesn’t deserve the label of Republican. Their actions today were anti-republican.

1. They passed a bill with significant changes added to it a scant three hours after the text was made public, without any hearings or external debate.
michellequist.bsky.social
Thanks Ben!

From the article:

"The bill passes along party lines, 22-7 (the Democrats and Forward Party members voting against)." #utpol
Reposted by Michelle Quist
kyledcheney.bsky.social
NEW: Judge Immergut's says Trump's assessment of "war-ravaged" Portland was not made in "good faith" Even under a legal standard that gives the president "great deference," she said, there's no basis for "ignoring the facts on the ground."

www.politico.com/news/2025/10...
michellequist.bsky.social
Most everything from this Administration is “simply untethered to the facts.”
kyledcheney.bsky.social
Judge IMMERGUT, a Trump appointee to the bench, ruled that Trump's call-up was based on false claims about unrest in Portland and that Trump's own statements were "simply untethered to the facts." storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
michellequist.bsky.social
I don’t understand how “Republicans” can be ok with this. #utpol
maxkennerly.bsky.social
This is a declaration they will use federal resources to deploy violence against judges, prosecutors, and attorneys general. There's no other coherent interpretation of the phrasing, including "only remedy," "legitimate state power," and connecting those people with "terror networks."
Stephen Miller
@StephenM
The issue before is now is very simple and clear. There is a large and growing movement of leftwing terrorism in this country. It is well organized and funded. And it is shielded by far-left Democrat judges, prosecutors and attorneys general. The only remedy is to use legitimate state power to dismantle terrorism and terror networks.
1:59 PM · Oct 4, 2025
·
1.3M
 Views
michellequist.bsky.social
This. 👇🏼 Please. If you read anything this evening on this App, PLEASE, read this short excerpt.

This legal question shouldn’t even be up for debate but for the clown show in our White House.
reichlinmelnick.bsky.social
Unanimous First Circuit takes pains to emphasize that this was an incredibly easy case to decide, despite writing a very long opinion knocking down every ridiculous argument the Trump admin made.
The analysis that follows is necessarily lengthy, as we
must address the parties' numerous arguments in each of the cases
involved. But the length of our analysis should not be mistaken
for a sign that the fundamental question that these cases raise
about the scope of birthright citizenship is a difficult one. It
is not, which may explain why it has been more than a century since
a branch of our government has made as concerted an effort as the
Executive Branch now makes to deny Americans their birthright.
michellequist.bsky.social
ICE is a scourge fueled by bullies and losers. Anyone who supports this is the same.
michellequist.bsky.social
You’re kidding.
kyledcheney.bsky.social
BREAKING: The 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, in a 100-page opinion -- says it is unequivocally, lopsidedly easy to determine that the Trump administration's view of birthright citizenship is wrong.

www.documentcloud.org/documents/26...
michellequist.bsky.social
👀
joshuajfriedman.com
NEW: Judge Crenshaw finds that the Trump admin's criminal prosecution of Kilmar Abrego Garcia may well be vindictive—and greenlights discovery and an evidentiary hearing. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
MEMORANDUM OPINION
By way of context, a federal prosecutor is the representative not of an ordinary party to a controversy, but of a sovereignty whose obligation to govern impartially is as compelling as its obligation to govern at all. The obligation to govern impartially concerns, above all, the state's exercise of coercive power-meaning its power to deprive its subjects of life, liberty, or property... As a representative of the state, a prosecutor's exercise of coercive power must be impartial ... [in] that prosecutorial power may not be exercised vindictivelymeaning that the prosecutor may not punish a defendant for exercising a protected statutory or constitutional right.
United States v. Zakhari, 85 F.4th 367, 384-85 (6th Cir. 2023) (Kethledge, J., concurring) (citations and quotations omitted). This context frames review of Defendant Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia's ("Abrego") motion to dismiss his indictment for vindictive and selective
prosecution. (Doc. Nos. 104-05). The Government opposes the motion (Doc. No. 121), and Abrego has replied (Doc. No. 127). Abrego's motion is not ripe for decision because he seeks discovery and an evidentiary hearing because there is some evidence of vindictiveness here. For the reasons that follow, the Court holds that the totality of events creates a sufficient evidentiary basis to conclude that there is a "realistic likelihood of vindictiveness" that entitles Abrego to discovery and requires an evidentiary hearing before the Court decides his motion. United States
v. Andrews, 633 F.2d 449, 457 (6th Cir. 1980) (en banc), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 927 (1981).
michellequist.bsky.social
He’s being disingenuous and lying to your face. It’s a false choice. He could offer a better bill.
michellequist.bsky.social
Isn’t this who is buying TikTok?
robertscotthorton.bsky.social
Larry Ellison envisions a surveillance state in which techbros rule. '“Citizens will be on their best behavior, because we’re constantly recording and reporting everything that is going on,” Ellison said in an hour-long Q&A during Oracle’s Financial Analyst Meeting last week.'
Larry Ellison predicts rise of the modern surveillance state where ‘citizens will be on their best behavior’ | Fortune
Oracle's Larry Ellison believes citizens and police alike will be under constant surveillance of each other.
fortune.com
michellequist.bsky.social
LIKELY?!?
kyledcheney.bsky.social
BREAKING: A federal judge has ordered the University of South Dakota to reinstate a professor who posted criticism of Charlie Kirk on his Facebook page the day of the shooting, finding the action likely violated the First Amendment. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
michellequist.bsky.social
Doesn't require the Leg to adopt a map.

Soliciting feedback on multiple maps. Maps you see online will be available for public comment for 10 days as long as submitted by 9/25.

After 25th, no new maps considered.
michellequist.bsky.social
Everything from today will be uploaded by tomorrow. The Leg can't adopt a map that isn't online tomorrow, 9/25.

Sandall - there's been confusion about whether we've been ordered to recommend a map today. Court says 10-day window applies. Leg can't adopt a map that hasn't been public 10 days.
michellequist.bsky.social
Pierucci ends- "I want to make sure we set the table" - there was a reference to the colonists who did not have representation. Just because you don't agree with the legislator's party who represents you, you're still represented. There are countries in the world-Sudan, etc. - that are authoritarian
michellequist.bsky.social
Well, I'm out friends. Sign in to the hearing yourselves and listen in to, presumably, upcoming public comment.
michellequist.bsky.social
If we adopt this map, we're open to legal action, based on SCOTUS.

(Her legal analysis throughout these committee hearings has been off every time. It's funny that her last comment started with, Well, I'm not a lawyer ..." Maybe she should stop lawyering.)
michellequist.bsky.social
Gricius says she's concerned about Emigration Canyon piece - odd carveouts in Dist 2 and 3 - just one example "I have a whole list of them."

Where was Gricius when Millcreek was cut in 4? lol

"The lines are hilarious to me."
michellequist.bsky.social
Fillmore - you said you created this map on basis of other map-what map? why does your map split so many cities/counties, which is #1 priority?

Escamilla-told we couldn't use IRC maps - started with Orange map, then reduced splits (14 to 13).

Fillmore - but prop 4 says cities shouldn't be split.
michellequist.bsky.social
Fillmore - no accusation that anyone looked at partisan data?

no.
michellequist.bsky.social
Magleby - Statute says unduly -

Fillmore - so what's your accusation?

Magleby - I don't have an accusation. standard accepted methodology for evaluation undue .. ensemble analysis - but haven't seen analysis of where maps fall -
michellequist.bsky.social
Sen. Fillmore - accusations that we're violating the law by ex-ante looking at partisan data

Owens - no accusation that committee looking - just questioning how expert designed the test. don't think anyone looked at data ahead of time.
michellequist.bsky.social
Roberts - oh yeah, I did read that. but statute says partisan symmetry - we're just trying to define that - and we're just using that definition - just attaching that same definition.

Nah man.
michellequist.bsky.social
Pierucci - we won't present a map that fails - we sent maps that didn't pass that we didn't present.