Reposted by Millie
Yes, offshore wind is essential for tackling climate change.
But clean energy shouldn’t come with a body count.
We should be working towards lower-impact sites that can deliver the same energy without wiping out wildlife.
We don’t have to choose between climate action and living seabirds.
But clean energy shouldn’t come with a body count.
We should be working towards lower-impact sites that can deliver the same energy without wiping out wildlife.
We don’t have to choose between climate action and living seabirds.
January 14, 2026 at 12:39 PM
Yes, offshore wind is essential for tackling climate change.
But clean energy shouldn’t come with a body count.
We should be working towards lower-impact sites that can deliver the same energy without wiping out wildlife.
We don’t have to choose between climate action and living seabirds.
But clean energy shouldn’t come with a body count.
We should be working towards lower-impact sites that can deliver the same energy without wiping out wildlife.
We don’t have to choose between climate action and living seabirds.
It was sublime. Still humming it.
January 17, 2026 at 10:58 PM
It was sublime. Still humming it.
For goodness sake, lock it up between now and the summer!
November 18, 2025 at 10:15 PM
For goodness sake, lock it up between now and the summer!
Woohoo! You were right 🙌🏼 🏴
November 18, 2025 at 9:50 PM
Woohoo! You were right 🙌🏼 🏴