Molly Reynolds
@mollyereynolds.bsky.social
19K followers 200 following 480 posts
Senior Fellow, @brookings.edu. Still not the Senate Parliamentarian.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
mollyereynolds.bsky.social
Find me when Collins's talking stick appears.
burgessev.bsky.social
Is it time for ... a Senate shutdown GANG?

Coons: “A couple more days of this, and you'll have a group of senators at least trying"

Murkowski: “For the Democrats to switch their vote ... you have to have some germ of an idea as to where we go once we get it open"

www.semafor.com/article/10/0...
Could a bipartisan Senate gang stop the shutdown?
Senators once locked arms across the aisle on infrastructure, immigration, and more. Some in the chamber think that’s the way out of the current crisis.
www.semafor.com
Reposted by Molly Reynolds
lawfaremedia.org
On Lawfare Daily, @mollyereynolds.bsky.social spoke to @nicholasbednar.bsky.social and Sam Berger about how the Trump administration is using this government shutdown to pursue RIFs and how to think about the shutdown in the broader context of the Trump administration’s exercise of executive power.
Lawfare Daily: The Law of the Shutdown
YouTube video by Lawfare
youtu.be
mollyereynolds.bsky.social
you're really burying the lede by failing to mention that said reign involved lamberth ordering the severing of the internet connections of parts of the interior department *more than once* www.govexec.com/federal-news...
Judge severs Interior Department Web connections again
www.govexec.com
mollyereynolds.bsky.social
Will admit that, in the *extremely* large number of hours I spent thinking about pandemic-era congressional operations between 2020 and 2022, "if one lies during testimony delivered remotely, where is one possibly indicted?" did not cross my mind.
ericcolumbus.bsky.social
I had wondered how Comey could be indicted in EDVA for lying to Congress, which is in DC. I had forgotten that during the pandemic you could testify from the friendly confines of home!
mollyereynolds.bsky.social
Oh, and underappreciated point: even if Congress avoids a shutdown now, they're just kicking the can down the road for some number of weeks and this core tension will still be here when a CR runs out.
mollyereynolds.bsky.social
No prediction, but here's the big tension imo:

1. Dems are facing pressure to "fight" for the sake of "fighting" in a way that is newer to them than to the GOP.
2. A shutdown is at odds with one of the core reasons someone becomes a congressional Democrat: government should work and do things.
kwcollins.bsky.social
Has @mollyereynolds.bsky.social issued a shutdown / no shutdown prediction yet?
mollyereynolds.bsky.social
One unexpected consequence of the Senate's recent changes vis-a-vis nominations? The absolute number it has done on the vote page on senate dot gov. So much more scrolling!
mollyereynolds.bsky.social
Knowing that the Senate lost some official papers in mid-2020 makes me feel better about any number of things my brain failed at during that year.
mollyereynolds.bsky.social
Good morning to everyone but mostly to the person who designed this pop-up that greets you on the House Appropriations Committee Democrats' web site.
mollyereynolds.bsky.social
The "we should have more younger members of Congress" conversation isn't just about things like whether committee chair term limits choke off paths to power. It's also about things like this.
mollyereynolds.bsky.social
take it up with the census bureau?
Reposted by Molly Reynolds
lawfaremedia.org
On Lawfare Daily, @mollyereynolds.bsky.social, Zach Price, and Philip Wallach discuss pocket rescissions as an approach to cancelling funds previously approved by Congress.

www.lawfaremedia.org/article/lawf...
mollyereynolds.bsky.social
the source of the single weirdest thing, imo, in the unexpectedly large universe of weird post-viral things that happen in kids
mollyereynolds.bsky.social
that's your lane, dooling, not mine :).
mollyereynolds.bsky.social
i think the original provision is actually in the FSGG title, in the government-wide general provisions section. it repeats in the FY24 omni (www.congress.gov/118/plaws/pu..., pp. 117-18). I don't *think* there's anything in the FY25 CR that changes that provision but I'm less confident.
www.congress.gov
mollyereynolds.bsky.social
this is like my personal catnip. standby.
mollyereynolds.bsky.social
If you need some pre-Labor Day weekend reading on pocket rescissions (and who doesn't), I have the list for you! You can start with GAO itself, which cuts to the chase with "Are pocket rescissions legal? No." www.gao.gov/blog/what-po...
www.gao.gov
mollyereynolds.bsky.social
best news about someone who's not usually in dc being present here that i've heard all week.