Micha Sam Brickman Raredon
banner
msbr89.bsky.social
Micha Sam Brickman Raredon
@msbr89.bsky.social
Scientist/Engineer. Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology @ Yale. Tissue Biology, Lung Regeneration, Data Visualization. Here to learn. https://RaredonLab.com
January 25, 2026 at 3:38 AM
December 16, 2025 at 7:49 PM
Our landing point has been to visualize these connectivity fields as three-dimensional surfaces that you can rotate in space!

Here are a few selected fields from a single location in a mouse embryo capturing the developing ribs, lung, and diaphragm:

Interactive HTML: figshare.com/s/2f66def6d2...
December 15, 2025 at 2:54 PM
This lead us down a beautiful rabbit-hole experimenting with the relationship between high-dimensional connectivity and the resolution of spatial tissue domains.

Note that in all of these graphs, we are exclusively studying ligand-receptor information, no intracellular genes:
December 15, 2025 at 2:48 PM
To evaluate, we needed to quantify the high-dimensional structure of these 'connectivity fields'. So, we performed unsupervised clustering and measured the number and the spatial entropy (coherence) of the resulting groups. We found that a stoichiometrically-informed convolution maximized structure:
December 15, 2025 at 2:44 PM
But this modeling was done on the ligand and the receptor individually. We wanted to predict density fields for ligand-receptor binding! We therefore experimented with ways of convolving these outputs, comparing established methods with next-gen ideas informed by ligand-receptor binding kinetics:
December 15, 2025 at 2:32 PM
But how to approach? There are many well-established spatial statistical models for data with exactly this form. We tested and compared three in particular: a Poisson, Zero-Inflated Poisson (ZIP), and Zero-Adjusted Poisson (ZAP), and found that the Poisson model was the top performing:
December 15, 2025 at 2:25 PM
For one, we realized almost immediately that we needed to think carefully about what data to use as input.

Most single-cell and spatial pipelines use count-normalized data. But we learned that this was likely not the best starting point for the tissue-scale modeling we had in mind.
December 15, 2025 at 2:09 PM
If handled thoughtfully, we realized that these count values could be used to infer continuous fields estimating local ligand density, local receptor density, and the local probability of ligand-receptor binding events. We had a loose plan, but many questions about specifics...
December 15, 2025 at 2:04 PM
We found ourselves particularly interested in modeling local ligand-receptor interaction probability densities. This is because these data have a wealth of information regarding omics-level (high-dimensional) ligand and receptor transcription, in space:
December 15, 2025 at 2:00 PM
There are many things that we can think about measuring and modeling spatially using these types of data. Aaron and I have now had years of conversations about the different ways researchers might approach these data and the pros/cons of applying different perspectives.
December 15, 2025 at 1:58 PM
We were interested in seeing if we could use spatial statistics, well developed in geospatial statistics, to study morphogenic interactions in living tissues.

Spatial-omics methods are now producing rich datasets across entire tissues and organisms, allowing tissue-scale analysis:
December 15, 2025 at 1:56 PM
In the body, there are many forms of cellular input and output. Cells sense their environments, process this information in a state-dependent way, and then respond accordingly. These input/output loops are major drivers of tissue development and regulators of collective cellular behavior.
December 15, 2025 at 1:52 PM
20 years ago, Aaron Osgood-Zimmerman and I would entertain ourselves asking questions like, "How many crickets are in field?" or "How many cells are in the body?"

Aaron became a statistician, and I become a biologist.

We have now collaborated on an interesting exploration: doi.org/10.64898/202...
December 15, 2025 at 1:49 PM
December 3, 2025 at 12:56 PM
United States Disappeared Tracker

public.tableau.com/views/United...
October 1, 2025 at 1:21 AM
"Single cell RNA seq reveals the pro-regenerative phenotype of thrombospondin-2 deficient dermal fibroblasts"

www.nature.com/articles/s41...

Amazing work from Huang et al!
September 2, 2025 at 12:46 PM
'Single cell decomposition of multicellular aging programs associated with impaired lung regeneration'

www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
August 22, 2025 at 1:07 PM
'p53 maintains lineage fidelity during lung capillary injury-repair in neonatal hyperoxia'

insight.jci.org/articles/vie...
August 22, 2025 at 1:06 PM
United States Disappeared Tracker

public.tableau.com/views/United...
August 2, 2025 at 5:31 PM
The Edge of Objectivity, page 53:
August 2, 2025 at 12:11 PM
"The interplay between biomechanics and cell kinetics explains the spatial pattern in liver fibrosis"

www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
August 2, 2025 at 11:45 AM
"thinking for yourself is a frictional activity not a statistical correlation. An AI-mediated essay plan has already missed the point by bypassing the student's own capacity to develop and substantiate propositions about the world."

from @danmcquillan.bsky.social

danmcquillan.org/cpct_seminar...
June 23, 2025 at 12:37 PM
OMG I am so glad someone finally did this.

Thank you 🙏 @lelandmcinnes.bsky.social

This will now consume hours and hours of my time.

lmcinnes.github.io/datamapplot_...
June 23, 2025 at 12:12 PM
United States Disappeared Tracker

public.tableau.com/views/United...
June 15, 2025 at 10:29 PM