Mohammad Tajsar
@mtajsar.bsky.social
280 followers 94 following 2 posts
Attorney at @ ACLU of Southern California. Other things too.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
mtajsar.bsky.social
"This decision is further confirmation that the administration's paramilitary invasion of Los Angeles violated the Constitution and caused irreparable injury across the region."

More on our win from this evening: www.aclusocal.org/en/press-rel...
Ninth Circuit Court Denies Stay in L.A. Raids Case
Decision leaves temporary order in place, barring DHS from unlawful stop practices
www.aclusocal.org
Reposted by Mohammad Tajsar
aclusocal.bsky.social
This month, a federal judge granted a temporary restraining order (TRO) barring federal agents from conducting racist, suspicion-less stops. The order also ordered that immigrants arrested must have access to legal counsel. The federal government then immediately challenged the TRO and appealed.
mtajsar.bsky.social
It doesn't take a federal judge to say what we've all witnessed in front of our eyes this last month.
Reposted by Mohammad Tajsar
aclusocal.bsky.social
Please share this far and wide ‼️
Reposted by Mohammad Tajsar
mattcagle.bsky.social
NEW lawsuit: Sonoma County is operating a runaway warrantless drone surveillance program that regularly invades residents' privacy, interrupts personal lives, and instills dread in those targeted. This violates the CA Constitution and we're taking the County to court. www.aclunc.org/news/aclu-su...
ACLU Sues Sonoma County over Code Enforcement’s Runaway Drone Spying Program | ACLU of Northern CA
www.aclunc.org
Reposted by Mohammad Tajsar
aclu.org
ACLU @aclu.org · Mar 14
MUST-WATCH: This is the arrest of Mahmoud Khalil from the perspective of his wife, who is 8 months pregnant.

This is federal agents in plain clothes dragging a man from his home as punishment for his speech.

@nyclu.org @ccrjustice.org @theimeu.bsky.social
Reposted by Mohammad Tajsar
snowjake.bsky.social
GREAT NEWS: Today the court in Santa Barbara granted the motion to quash, adopting reasoning in our amicus brief. The court recognized that, when the government seeks information impacting speech rights, a much higher showing is necessary.