Dr Nadiah Kristensen
banner
nadiah.bsky.social
Dr Nadiah Kristensen
@nadiah.bsky.social
modeller of ecology, evolution, and cooperation | she/her | 🤘 | 🐘 fediscience.org/@nadiah | nadiah.org
To be clear, I have no idea what the answer is to all of this
December 28, 2025 at 8:22 AM
It doesn't have to be this way (sincerely)
December 28, 2025 at 8:22 AM
Apparently Claude has been using Grokipedia for at least a month

bsky.app/profile/dana...
danabra.mov dan @danabra.mov · Nov 26
sigh just had claude use grokipedia as a source. poisoning the well is working
December 26, 2025 at 11:00 PM
Thread summarising an arxiv preprint investigating what Grokipedia changed from Wikipedia by @harold.bsky.social and @mantzarlis.com

bsky.app/profile/haro...
back again to share a new preprint from me and @mantzarlis.com! “What did Elon Change? A comprehensive analysis of Grokipedia” arxiv.org/abs/2511.09685

I had seen many spot analyses of individual grokipedia pages, but I was curious: how was grokipedia made? what did Elon change from wikipedia?
December 26, 2025 at 10:56 PM
Oh! I only noticed this morning. So it has been at least a month
December 26, 2025 at 10:43 PM
Noticed this morning Claude also cites Grokipedia now
December 26, 2025 at 10:36 PM
That makes me really sad. They were both extremely successful in their fields. They didn't need to do that.
December 7, 2025 at 10:27 PM
Haha, thank you, this was helpful.
December 7, 2025 at 12:24 AM
Disrespecting reality seems like about 90% of what’s going wrong in the world right now
December 6, 2025 at 9:01 AM
I really appreciated how this article led with the context I needed to put the newsworthy part into perspective
December 5, 2025 at 8:17 PM
This is so unjust.
December 1, 2025 at 9:26 PM
Congratulations!
November 30, 2025 at 10:37 PM
Congratulations!
November 30, 2025 at 10:36 PM
Allegedly
November 27, 2025 at 9:06 PM
Though funnily enough, we got a really thorough review at Sci Rep. The reviewer was so careful they picked up a right author but wrong paper mis-citation. I think they even found typos in the supplement, from memory (20 pages of mostly maths). But we could have got somewhere else.
November 27, 2025 at 7:43 PM
A blessing for the system, not me.

I really regret not going with my gut and saying “no” to submitting that paper to Scientific Reports. The Ecol. Model. ones can’t be helped because that was a respectable journal at the time, but Sci Rep has always felt dodgy. That’s a lesson learned for me.
November 27, 2025 at 7:35 PM
… this could just be me being optimistic, but I think this could be a blessing in disguise.
November 27, 2025 at 7:19 PM
The first one I posted about 3 months ago here (still up, btw)

bsky.app/profile/nadi...
Check out the graphical abstract for a paper recently published in Ecological Modelling.

I have papers published in Ecological Modelling. Never again, I guess.
November 27, 2025 at 6:44 PM