@naffdoodaa.bsky.social
Why are you all still pretending they aren't the far right now?
Just look back at what they've been doing.
Much of it would have been unthinkable for a Labour government to do even 2 years ago.
If this were a Tory government, I suspect you'd have been up in arms against them regularly.
Just look back at what they've been doing.
Much of it would have been unthinkable for a Labour government to do even 2 years ago.
If this were a Tory government, I suspect you'd have been up in arms against them regularly.
December 7, 2025 at 12:02 PM
Why are you all still pretending they aren't the far right now?
Just look back at what they've been doing.
Much of it would have been unthinkable for a Labour government to do even 2 years ago.
If this were a Tory government, I suspect you'd have been up in arms against them regularly.
Just look back at what they've been doing.
Much of it would have been unthinkable for a Labour government to do even 2 years ago.
If this were a Tory government, I suspect you'd have been up in arms against them regularly.
This is about my thinking on it - that the time being taken is because she wants to force this through, not because she wants to stop it happening.
December 7, 2025 at 11:59 AM
This is about my thinking on it - that the time being taken is because she wants to force this through, not because she wants to stop it happening.
The second one tho.
That's also policed by good ol' Darwin.
Like. Most people obey the highway code because the alternative is death.
Which is really telling - as that implies she regularly drives dangerously, and that she thinks trans people deserve death if we don't obey her rules.
That's also policed by good ol' Darwin.
Like. Most people obey the highway code because the alternative is death.
Which is really telling - as that implies she regularly drives dangerously, and that she thinks trans people deserve death if we don't obey her rules.
December 7, 2025 at 8:28 AM
The second one tho.
That's also policed by good ol' Darwin.
Like. Most people obey the highway code because the alternative is death.
Which is really telling - as that implies she regularly drives dangerously, and that she thinks trans people deserve death if we don't obey her rules.
That's also policed by good ol' Darwin.
Like. Most people obey the highway code because the alternative is death.
Which is really telling - as that implies she regularly drives dangerously, and that she thinks trans people deserve death if we don't obey her rules.
I am not ready for this
December 7, 2025 at 7:42 AM
I am not ready for this
They already have the ability to herald the apocalypse many times over.
They do not need more.
They do not need more.
December 7, 2025 at 7:34 AM
They already have the ability to herald the apocalypse many times over.
They do not need more.
They do not need more.
The R in t-rex stands for rabbit
December 7, 2025 at 7:30 AM
The R in t-rex stands for rabbit
They forget that the only reason people use their service at all is because it's more convenient than piracy.
There are already plenty of ways to access larger catalogues because English access is generally rubbish, so fansubs were the only way to watch a lot of it.
There are already plenty of ways to access larger catalogues because English access is generally rubbish, so fansubs were the only way to watch a lot of it.
December 7, 2025 at 7:25 AM
They forget that the only reason people use their service at all is because it's more convenient than piracy.
There are already plenty of ways to access larger catalogues because English access is generally rubbish, so fansubs were the only way to watch a lot of it.
There are already plenty of ways to access larger catalogues because English access is generally rubbish, so fansubs were the only way to watch a lot of it.
Counterpoint
a man wearing a pink hat is hosted at gifs forum.com
Alt: Fresh prince of Bel Air wearing a pink hat sideways
media.tenor.com
December 6, 2025 at 11:18 PM
Counterpoint
I'm hoping that's what they're hinting at.
It reads to me as equivocation and a refusal to actually do anything.
It reads to me as equivocation and a refusal to actually do anything.
December 6, 2025 at 9:35 PM
I'm hoping that's what they're hinting at.
It reads to me as equivocation and a refusal to actually do anything.
It reads to me as equivocation and a refusal to actually do anything.
Otherwise, Labour's reply is is just a long winded way of saying "we're working on it".
That's not a rejection, it's delaying, which they flat out state up front:
"We are unapologetic about taking the time".
That's not a rejection, it's delaying, which they flat out state up front:
"We are unapologetic about taking the time".
December 6, 2025 at 9:25 PM
Otherwise, Labour's reply is is just a long winded way of saying "we're working on it".
That's not a rejection, it's delaying, which they flat out state up front:
"We are unapologetic about taking the time".
That's not a rejection, it's delaying, which they flat out state up front:
"We are unapologetic about taking the time".
Anyway, that article is not saying Labour's rejected it, only that Falkner's pissed they haven't signed off on it *yet*, states again trans inclusion is illegal, then goes on to claim that trans inclusion is on par with grooming gangs.
December 6, 2025 at 9:25 PM
Anyway, that article is not saying Labour's rejected it, only that Falkner's pissed they haven't signed off on it *yet*, states again trans inclusion is illegal, then goes on to claim that trans inclusion is on par with grooming gangs.
"The former head of the EHRC says Labour can no longer call itself the party of equality and has lost touch with its ‘fundamental values’"
Jeepers.
She's spent years cheerleading multiple hate groups to strip away equality rights.
She does not get to claim she is on the side of equality.
Archive:
Jeepers.
She's spent years cheerleading multiple hate groups to strip away equality rights.
She does not get to claim she is on the side of equality.
Archive:
archive.is
December 6, 2025 at 9:25 PM
"The former head of the EHRC says Labour can no longer call itself the party of equality and has lost touch with its ‘fundamental values’"
Jeepers.
She's spent years cheerleading multiple hate groups to strip away equality rights.
She does not get to claim she is on the side of equality.
Archive:
Jeepers.
She's spent years cheerleading multiple hate groups to strip away equality rights.
She does not get to claim she is on the side of equality.
Archive:
What a bizarre article.
The writer doesn't seem to know what they want to say, on account of not wanting to admit that Starmer's f**ked.
The writer doesn't seem to know what they want to say, on account of not wanting to admit that Starmer's f**ked.
archive.is
December 6, 2025 at 6:07 PM
What a bizarre article.
The writer doesn't seem to know what they want to say, on account of not wanting to admit that Starmer's f**ked.
The writer doesn't seem to know what they want to say, on account of not wanting to admit that Starmer's f**ked.
He employed an editor of the Sun to run Comms alongside a member of the sex matters board.
There is no problem with comms, they're delivering the message of what he's doing loud and clear.
If they wanted to tell a better story, they'd have to start by doing things that aren't awful all the time.
There is no problem with comms, they're delivering the message of what he's doing loud and clear.
If they wanted to tell a better story, they'd have to start by doing things that aren't awful all the time.
December 6, 2025 at 5:56 PM
He employed an editor of the Sun to run Comms alongside a member of the sex matters board.
There is no problem with comms, they're delivering the message of what he's doing loud and clear.
If they wanted to tell a better story, they'd have to start by doing things that aren't awful all the time.
There is no problem with comms, they're delivering the message of what he's doing loud and clear.
If they wanted to tell a better story, they'd have to start by doing things that aren't awful all the time.
What in the heck did I just read? That dude is not OK.
December 6, 2025 at 2:38 PM
What in the heck did I just read? That dude is not OK.
He's already doing nature documentaries for people who aren't the BBC, so people will still get them.
December 6, 2025 at 9:46 AM
He's already doing nature documentaries for people who aren't the BBC, so people will still get them.
Feet of clay?
December 6, 2025 at 9:45 AM
Feet of clay?
Wtf?
Does the GP think you're just taking the treatment for funsies or something?
Does the GP think you're just taking the treatment for funsies or something?
December 6, 2025 at 9:42 AM
Wtf?
Does the GP think you're just taking the treatment for funsies or something?
Does the GP think you're just taking the treatment for funsies or something?
And what's to stop cis men saying "sorry, but I'm a trans man"?
Or will it, as it always has been, just be a case of self ID like normal people? 🤔
Or will it, as it always has been, just be a case of self ID like normal people? 🤔
December 6, 2025 at 9:39 AM
And what's to stop cis men saying "sorry, but I'm a trans man"?
Or will it, as it always has been, just be a case of self ID like normal people? 🤔
Or will it, as it always has been, just be a case of self ID like normal people? 🤔
I assume they're going to be doing medical exams on the doorstep of everyone then?
Or will it just be of women who aren't pretty and white enough?
Will everyone have to bring a birth certificate along with an affidavit from the midwife to prove it's the original and not from a GRC?
Or will it just be of women who aren't pretty and white enough?
Will everyone have to bring a birth certificate along with an affidavit from the midwife to prove it's the original and not from a GRC?
December 6, 2025 at 9:39 AM
I assume they're going to be doing medical exams on the doorstep of everyone then?
Or will it just be of women who aren't pretty and white enough?
Will everyone have to bring a birth certificate along with an affidavit from the midwife to prove it's the original and not from a GRC?
Or will it just be of women who aren't pretty and white enough?
Will everyone have to bring a birth certificate along with an affidavit from the midwife to prove it's the original and not from a GRC?
P.S. Given this is Labour's official legal take, does this mean Labour is now entirely on board with implementing one of the world's most comprehensive trans bans?
Going further than the workplace, toilets, and changing rooms, but even extending it to conference halls.
Going further than the workplace, toilets, and changing rooms, but even extending it to conference halls.
December 6, 2025 at 9:34 AM
P.S. Given this is Labour's official legal take, does this mean Labour is now entirely on board with implementing one of the world's most comprehensive trans bans?
Going further than the workplace, toilets, and changing rooms, but even extending it to conference halls.
Going further than the workplace, toilets, and changing rooms, but even extending it to conference halls.
Are you proud of yourself?
Is this where you saw your life going when you were a kid @tombelger.bsky.social?
Bragging about implementing apartheid practices?
You should be calling out Labour's obvious "mistakes", not cheering them on.
Is this where you saw your life going when you were a kid @tombelger.bsky.social?
Bragging about implementing apartheid practices?
You should be calling out Labour's obvious "mistakes", not cheering them on.
December 6, 2025 at 9:34 AM
Are you proud of yourself?
Is this where you saw your life going when you were a kid @tombelger.bsky.social?
Bragging about implementing apartheid practices?
You should be calling out Labour's obvious "mistakes", not cheering them on.
Is this where you saw your life going when you were a kid @tombelger.bsky.social?
Bragging about implementing apartheid practices?
You should be calling out Labour's obvious "mistakes", not cheering them on.
"This reflects our commitment to addressing the underrepresentation of women in the Party" they say.
While banning entire minorities of women because a handful of bigots are whining.
The EQUALITY ACT does not make discrimination mandatory.
While banning entire minorities of women because a handful of bigots are whining.
The EQUALITY ACT does not make discrimination mandatory.
December 6, 2025 at 9:34 AM
"This reflects our commitment to addressing the underrepresentation of women in the Party" they say.
While banning entire minorities of women because a handful of bigots are whining.
The EQUALITY ACT does not make discrimination mandatory.
While banning entire minorities of women because a handful of bigots are whining.
The EQUALITY ACT does not make discrimination mandatory.