Nataliya Kosmyna, Ph.D
@nataliyakosmyna.bsky.social
170 followers 18 following 41 posts
Research scientist @mit @fluidinterfaces @mitmedialab Ph.D in Computer Science and Brain Computer Interfaces. Project lead @NeuraFutures, Augmenting Brains https://linktr.ee/nataliyakosmyna
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
nataliyakosmyna.bsky.social
𝐍𝐨, 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐛𝐫𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐝𝐨𝐞𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦 𝐛𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐚𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐋𝐋𝐌 𝐨𝐫 𝐝𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐋𝐋𝐌 𝐮𝐬𝐞.

See our paper for more results: "Your Brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of Cognitive Debt when Using an AI Assistant for Essay Writing Task" : www.brainonllm.com
Reposted by Nataliya Kosmyna, Ph.D
financialtimes.com
New data shows the ways millions of people have integrated AI into their everyday lives. Also, it suggests that for now at least, AI is an individual productivity tool — both at work and in our personal lives — rather than the broader workplace disrupter many in Big Tech predicted. on.ft.com/47cKBVN
Reposted by Nataliya Kosmyna, Ph.D
ethikrat.org
#Hirnimplantate, #Exoskelette, #Sprachprothesen, #Neuro-Gaming: Welche Innovationen prägen die Forschung in der #Neurotechnologie? Öffentliche Anhörung: 18.09., 13.30-18 Uhr 👉 Programm: www.ethikrat.org/veranstaltun...
#Ethikrat #BCI @plasticity-lab.bsky.social @stanford.edu @uni-freiburg.de
Reposted by Nataliya Kosmyna, Ph.D
ethikrat.org
🔔 Herzliche Einladung zur öffentlichen Anhörung #Neurotechnologie: 18. September, 13.30-18 Uhr, 👉 www.ethikrat.org/live
@plasticity-lab.bsky.social @stanford.edu @uni-freiburg.de
#Ethikrat #BCI
nataliyakosmyna.bsky.social
the risks for cognitive development + social changes are real, and not enough is done by the governments to actively investigate those and be more proactive about those.
nataliyakosmyna.bsky.social
just using “Study Mode” will not be a magic solution. What I think would happen at the very least, is that we will end up having a lot of “AI-ready customers”, who literally got exposed to the agents for X years of their life, when their brains have been in active development stage. 2/n
nataliyakosmyna.bsky.social
Hard to say without getting into a lot of speculation: we do need more data. It would heavily depend on the type of agents, instructions, the roles, the format of the rest of the school process (will teachers still be there? What is the % of their involvement? Would tower students be around?) 1/n
nataliyakosmyna.bsky.social
Just 5 weeks after I talked to the Time magazine's Andrew Chow and mentioned that "I am afraid in 6-8 months, there will be some policymaker who decides,
'let's do GPT kindergarten!", we are now getting news about Baby Grok.

This timeline is not the one I desire for our universe.
Reposted by Nataliya Kosmyna, Ph.D
nataliyakosmyna.bsky.social
My message to you, dear reader, stays clear: if you 𝐰𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐞 without your thinking, is it 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐡 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠?

www.nytimes.com/2025/07/18/o...
Opinion | The Seductions of A.I. for the Writer’s Mind
www.nytimes.com
nataliyakosmyna.bsky.social
She did put it well, to capture the moment when it becomes «no-brainer» for a LLM user to say «yes» to the next suggestion and relinquish ownership and go from LLM being human’s derivative, to becoming yourself, a derivative of LLM.
nataliyakosmyna.bsky.social
« This 𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 to the world is worth trying to preserve. The act of care that makes meaning – or insight – possible. To do so we 𝐰𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐫𝐞𝐪𝐮𝐢𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤.»
nataliyakosmyna.bsky.social
«When I write, the process is full of risk, error and painstaking self-correction. It arrives somewhere surprising only when I’ve stayed in uncertainty long enough to find out what I had initially failed to understand.»
nataliyakosmyna.bsky.social
Loved today’s Guest Opinion Essay published in @nytimes.com, written by @meghanor.bsky.social after her thought experiment with ChatGPT, also mentioning our paper «Your Brain on ChatGPT».
Reposted by Nataliya Kosmyna, Ph.D
Reposted by Nataliya Kosmyna, Ph.D
siegenthalerlab.bsky.social
@meghanor.bsky.social article is exceptional, the concerns raised apply just as much to scientific writing.
You can use AI to generate ideas, to summarize, to even write your grants & manuscripts...but, ethics aside, do you miss out on 'the pleasure of invention'?
www.nytimes.com/2025/07/18/o...
Opinion | The Seductions of A.I. for the Writer’s Mind
www.nytimes.com
nataliyakosmyna.bsky.social
Excited for today's @nytopinion.nytimes.com in the paper edition of @nytimes.com and online by David Brooks for asking the question.

Our human ability to formulate questions and learn from the answers matters, as never before.
nataliyakosmyna.bsky.social
If we fail with Al in education, do other domains even have a chance?

Great to see the conversation taking place. We need more studies and more research done to truly understand where humans benefit from Al in the long term.
nytopinion.nytimes.com
“A.I. isn’t going anywhere, so the crucial question is one of motivation,” our columnist David Brooks writes. “What do students, and all of us, really care about — clearing the schedule or becoming educated?” https://nyti.ms/44K3cat
Opinion | How A.I. Could Make Us Dumber
It’s not an education if A.I. does your thinking for you.
nyti.ms
nataliyakosmyna.bsky.social
Please note: “47% collapse” is coming from AI-generated summaries, not from our preprint, please do not post/repost it. We actually tracked that it comes from LLMs (will make a post about it), as are 17 other claims we never made in our paper as well as the vocabulary we are not using :-)
nataliyakosmyna.bsky.social
Please note: “47% collapse” is coming from AI-generated summaries, not from our preprint, please do not repost it. We actually tracked that it comes from LLMs (will make a post about it), as are 17 other claims we never made in our paper as well as the vocabulary we are not using :-)
nataliyakosmyna.bsky.social
Unfortunately some reporting totally missed on the Limitations section as well, which is very clear.