Nathanael Sheehan
@nathanaelsheehan.bsky.social
190 followers 170 following 18 posts
Computer Science | Philosophy of Science // PhD student part of PHIL_OS (https://opensciencestudies.eu/) (he/him) nsheehan.vercel.app
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Nathanael Sheehan
adrian-currie.bsky.social
If you’re interested in practicing the philosophy of science in practice why not come along to an online workshop “the philosophy of science in practice - in practice”? #philsci
Reposted by Nathanael Sheehan
abeba.bsky.social
a grifter who left a political career (former UK Deputy Prime Minister) to serve as Zucks lapdog, now says the most evil company is indeed 'evil' having
actively created a hostile/anti-regulation culture & making millions doing it. cry me a fucking river

www.theguardian.com/technology/2...
‘At Meta I found myself wrestling my deputy in an MMA gym’: Nick Clegg on the culture shock of Silicon Valley
In an exclusive extract from his new book, the former Meta number two recalls the mindset, the mantras and the man at the top
www.theguardian.com
Reposted by Nathanael Sheehan
goldstein.bsky.social
These Billionaires need you to believe that they are super smart like their friends from high school, not just rich. Its not enough for them to be richer, they have to be richer because they are smarter.
Reposted by Nathanael Sheehan
olivia.science
Likening PhD holders to a (non-functional) algorithm is a form of dehumanisation & anti-intellectualism that is a bellwether for contemporary fascism. Essentially it's a typical — if not the archetypal — first step towards fascism: to dehumanise, deskill, defund, and, ultimately, fire the academics.
metaomicsnerd.bsky.social
What I would like to remind everyone talking about Sam Altman talking about the “PhD level intelligence” of the new ChatGPT is that Sam Altman dropped out of college so he… has no experiential construct for what grad school even is.
nathanaelsheehan.bsky.social
Very excited for this to finally be published!! As someone who will soon graduate with a PhD in Environmental Intelligence (EI), it has always been difficult to explain what EI is. Sabina's new paper answers these questions and provides a roadmap for future EI research 🌿🐝👩🏻‍💻 🦠🎋
sabinaleonelli.bsky.social
Just out /2: condensing years of thinking, my philosophical examination of “Environmental Intelligence” as framing for foundations of #AI is on @harvarddataverse.bsky.social ! Officially published with commentaries in October, but sneak preview here: hdsr.mitpress.mit.edu/pub/mx9vpa0b... #philsci 🧪
Environmental Intelligence: Redefining the Philosophical Premises of AI
Forthcoming. Now Available: Just Accepted Version.
hdsr.mitpress.mit.edu
Reposted by Nathanael Sheehan
sabinaleonelli.bsky.social
Just out / 1: “methods in philosophy of science”, #OA heroically assembled by Adrian Currie & Sophie Veigl. Comments welcome on mine & @Rachel Ankeny’s “Research design for philosophy of science in practice”, topic close to our hearts & constant source of questions! mitpress.mit.edu/978026255224...
Methods in the Philosophy of Science
The last twenty years have seen multiple methodological revolutions in the philosophy of science: There has been increased diversity concerning the questions...
mitpress.mit.edu
Reposted by Nathanael Sheehan
abeba.bsky.social
so I am one of the 12 people (including the “god-fathers of AI”) that will be at the Vatican this September for a two full-day working group on the Future of AI

here is my Vatican approved short provocation on 'AI and Fraternity' for the working group
AI and Fraternity, Abeba Birhane, AI Accountability Lab  

I envision a future where human dignity, justice, peace, kindness, care, respect, accountability, and rights and freedoms serve as the north stars that guide AI development and use. Realising these ideals can’t happen without intentional tireless work, dialogues, and confrontations of ugly realities – even if they are uncomfortable to deal with. This starts with deciphering hype from reality. Pervasive narratives portray AI as a magical, fully autonomous entity approaching a God-like omnipotence and omniscience. In reality, audits of AI systems reveal a consistent failure to deliver on grandiose promises and suffer from all kinds of shortcomings, issues often swept under the rug. AI in general, and GenAI in particular, encodes and exacerbates historical stereotypes, entrenches harmful societal norms, and amplifies injustice. A robust body of  evidence demonstrates that — from hiring, welfare allocation, medical care allocation to anything in between — deployment of AI is widening inequity, disproportionately impacting people at the margins of society and concentrating power and influence in the hands of few. Major actors—including Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, and OpenAI—have willingly aligned with authoritarian regimes and proactively abandoned their pledges to fact-check, prevent misinformation, respect diversity and equity, refrain from using AI for weapons development, while retaliating against critique. The aforementioned vision can’t and won’t happen without confrontation of these uncomfortable facts. This is precisely why we need active resistance and refusal of unreliable and harmful AI systems; clearly laid out regulation and enforcement; and shepherding of the AI industry towards transparency and accountability of responsible bodies. "Machine agency" must be in service of human agency and empowerment, a coexistence that isn't a continuation of modern tech corporations’ inequality-widening,
Reposted by Nathanael Sheehan
bayesianboy.bsky.social
Methods in the Philosophy of Science: A User's Guide is now a real, live book. My chapter offers an appraisal of philosophy of science in its engagement with applied mathematics. With immense gratitude for the vision and execution of @phieveigl.bsky.social and @adrian-currie.bsky.social sky.social.
Methods in the Philosophy of Science
The last twenty years have seen multiple methodological revolutions in the philosophy of science: There has been increased diversity concerning the questions...
mitpress.mit.edu
Reposted by Nathanael Sheehan
abeba.bsky.social
all microsoft products are shit. my working days would be much more productive if I didn't have to use them
Reposted by Nathanael Sheehan
edinitiative.bsky.social
Should we expect AI to be explainable?

Read the new Ethical Data Blog post by Laura Gorrieri, EDI Affiliate from the University of Turin. A thought-provoking read for anyone interested in the ethical implications of AI.

👉 ethicaldatainitiative.org/2025/06/04/s...
Reposted by Nathanael Sheehan
alelazic.bsky.social
Just published: my 3rd & final PhD paper! (with @iriszez.bsky.social)

🧪📢 How should we talk about vaccination rates?

Assuming rationality, normativity, or reasonableness leads to very different outcomes.

Findings from 3 experiments:

🔓 doi.org/10.1177/0033...

#PsychSky #AcademicSky #Psychology
A digital scan of the first page of a journal article titled “Should Public Communication of Vaccination Rates Assume Rationality, Normativity or Reasonableness? Insights from Three Preregistered Experiments.” The title is in bold black text. Authors are Aleksandra Lazić and Iris Žeželj, affiliated with the University of Belgrade – Faculty of Philosophy. The article is published in Psychological Reports (2025, Vol. 0(0), pages 1–26). A Creative Commons license and DOI link are included. Violin Plot Comparing Vaccination Intention by Message Type (Figure 1) Four Violin Plots Comparing Vaccination Intention Pre- and Post-Message Intervention (Figure 2)
Reposted by Nathanael Sheehan
leyawn.bsky.social
“is my calculator horny?“ our tech columnist asks. “i entered 5318008 into it and turned it upside down. what i saw surprised me”
nytimes.com
“Can ChatGPT experience joy or suffering? Does Gemini deserve human rights?” our tech columnist asks. “Many A.I. experts I know would say no, not yet, not even close. But I was intrigued.”
Should We Start Taking the Welfare of A.I. Seriously?
As artificial intelligence systems become smarter, one A.I. company is trying to figure out what to do if they become conscious.
www.nytimes.com
Reposted by Nathanael Sheehan
timnitgebru.bsky.social
He could, for instance, have written about any number of topics. Here are some ideas for free.

1. What cults are the Anthropic crew in, and what is the ideological ancestry of these cults? (We've done the work for him here, hint hint, its eugenics: firstmonday.org/ojs/index.ph...).
Reposted by Nathanael Sheehan
lastpositivist.bsky.social
This was interesting! As I understand it the claim is: in the UK the only research at scale is done by big universities. This meant the ATI was immediately captured by a clique thereof, who just wanted to use it to shuffle government money back to themselves...

www.chalmermagne.com/p/how-not-to...
How not to build an AI Institute
What went wrong with the Alan Turing Institute?
www.chalmermagne.com
nathanaelsheehan.bsky.social
The only thing spurs can defend is their decade long run without a trophy 🏆
Reposted by Nathanael Sheehan
bayesianboy.bsky.social
I have long complained about gemini overview being embedded, non-optionally, in web search. However, I wish to revise my opinion. I think it can, in fact, serve a function, namely, as evidence of the extent to which folk knowledge of a given subject is confused or contradictory.
Reposted by Nathanael Sheehan
janus.bsky.social
we made a critical error allowing reactionaries to make-up concepts like “biological sex” and frame them as non-ideological when it’s the exact opposite: people who undergo HRT *are literally changing their biological sex.* this is not some philosophical distinction, it is actual biological reality.
Reposted by Nathanael Sheehan
neurograce.bsky.social
If you're not aware of forum.safeguar.de and other efforts to save data/tools from government destruction, now is the time to learn about them. You can even help!
Reposted by Nathanael Sheehan
alelazic.bsky.social
Open science isn't just for the rich.

I wrote about building #REPOPSI – a repository of psychological instruments in Serbian – and what it taught me about doing #OpenScience with limited resources and lots of persistence. #PhDSky

doi.org/10.1038/d415...
Screenshot of a Nature article titled "How a ‘boring administrative task’ transformed my PhD career," published on 14 April 2025 in the Career Column section. The subtitle reads, "Good ideas — and impactful tools — don’t just come from rich, Western nations, says Aleksandra Lazić, a social scientist in Serbia." The article is written by Aleksandra Lazić, whose name appears as a clickable link.
Reposted by Nathanael Sheehan
rosetrappes.bsky.social
Today in the reading group I run with @nathanaelsheehan.bsky.social, we discussed how undersea internet cables track and replicate colonialism, based on this paper: Mwema & Birhane, A. (2024). First Monday, 29(4). doi.org/10.5210/fm.v...
Undersea cables in Africa: The new frontiers of digital colonialism | First Monday
doi.org