Nearly Legal
@nearlylegal.co.uk
8.6K followers 1.2K following 3.9K posts
Solicitor. Done housing law since 2006. The Guardian says top 5 for squalor. Legal Aid Housing Lawyer of 2018. Co-author of Homes (Fitness for Human Habitation) Act 2018. ‘Not an academic authority’ - Judge Carr. https://nearlylegal.co.uk
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
nearlylegal.co.uk
Your children (or more likely grandchildren) won't get to go to university is a bold pitch to potential tory voters.
resprofnews.bsky.social
Breaking: Tories would slash university places by 100k.

Student numbers cap plan billed as saving £3 billion to invest in apprenticeship funding.

Tomorrow, Badenoch will unveil plans to limit student numbers across all subjects.

www.researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-uk-p...
Tories would slash university places by 100,000 - Research Professional News
Student numbers cap plan billed as saving £3 billion to invest in “doubled” apprenticeship funding
www.researchprofessionalnews.com
nearlylegal.co.uk
I could've been a judge, but I never had the Latin... I never had the Latin to get through the rigorous judging exams. They're very rigorous, the judging exams, very rigorous indeed. They're noted for their rigor. People come out of them saying, "My God, what a rigorous exam!"
nearlylegal.co.uk
Yes, I once was an art historian/critic. Some 20 odd years ago. Sorry.
nearlylegal.co.uk
Crowds at a concert, Amazon warehouses, super stores, apartment blocks. All in dialectical tension between the inhuman imposed order of the whole and the variation and individuality of the detail - which, again, cannot both be seen at the same time.
nearlylegal.co.uk
If you've not seen Gursky prints in the flesh, they are big - often 2 meters wide or so - but hugely detailed. Formally rigorous, usually flat, geometric patterns, bordering on the abstract and de-individualised, but the detail - which can't be seen at the same time as seeing the whole - is various.
nearlylegal.co.uk
Oh, that is dreadful, I'm sorry.

Yes, but a long way to go on an answer, I fear.
nearlylegal.co.uk
Heseltine was at least a man of some principles, though many of them were not ones I'd agree with. He was also an ambitious, back stabbing git, but vaguely in pursuit of principles.
nearlylegal.co.uk
Yes - same year. And it is the worst club. My sympathy and understanding.
nearlylegal.co.uk
It was horrible. MND is a deeply cruel condition. But I do think awareness and earlier diagnosis has meant it seems more prevalent, rather than increasing numbers.
nearlylegal.co.uk
Jenrick's big problem is that most people don't know about him at all, but anyone who does regards him as a slimy, unprincipled piece of shit. Which is not a good base for leading the Tories to victory, regardless of TikTok videos at tube stations.
nearlylegal.co.uk
And the things Jenrick (a former solicitor) will casually throw under the bus for perceived advantage include the basic principle of an independent judiciary.

bsky.app/profile/samf...
samfr.bsky.social
Jenrick now proposing sacking judges he doesn't like. I can just about remember when Conservatives cared about things like the rule of law.
sgfmann.bsky.social
The Daily Telegraph: MI5 kept in dark in China spy trial fiasco #TomorrowsPapersToday
nearlylegal.co.uk
My mum died from MND in the early 2000s, I don't know about more prevalent - certainly more in the public eye (and I think earlier diagnoses).
nearlylegal.co.uk
Robert Jenrick is particularly vile not because of his views. He doesn't have any views. His particular loathsomeness is that he is utterly amoral in what he is prepared to say for perceived advantage, without any care for consequences.

www.theguardian.com/politics/202...
Robert Jenrick complained of ‘not seeing another white face’ in Birmingham neighbourhood
Shadow justice secretary criticised for suggesting he could tell how integrated Handsworth was based on short visit
www.theguardian.com
nearlylegal.co.uk
Just watched 1917. Unconvinced by plot or meaning, which both seemed a bit trite, but blimey that is some bravura film-making.
nearlylegal.co.uk
Interesting indeed on the TFA argument. Thinking about it in relation to the s.48 point in Lumsden v Charles [2025] EWCC 7
nearlylegal.co.uk
Pretty low over the garden. Phone camera.
nearlylegal.co.uk
Work interrupted by a particularly noisy red kite.
Sunlit red kite against a blue sky
Reposted by Nearly Legal
nearlylegal.co.uk
A reminder from the High Court that where the local authority owes the duty to provide suitable accommodation, and is in breach of that duty, general statements about the difficulty of obtaining temporary accommodation will not be enough to avoid a mandatory order

nearlylegal.co.uk/2025/10/unsu...
Unsuitability and a mandatory order - Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment
Hammad, R (on the application of) v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (2025) EWHC 2425 (Admin) This was a judicial review of RBKC’s failure to provide suitable accommodation under s.193 Housing Ac...
nearlylegal.co.uk
nearlylegal.co.uk
A reminder from the High Court that where the local authority owes the duty to provide suitable accommodation, and is in breach of that duty, general statements about the difficulty of obtaining temporary accommodation will not be enough to avoid a mandatory order

nearlylegal.co.uk/2025/10/unsu...
Unsuitability and a mandatory order - Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment
Hammad, R (on the application of) v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (2025) EWHC 2425 (Admin) This was a judicial review of RBKC’s failure to provide suitable accommodation under s.193 Housing Ac...
nearlylegal.co.uk
nearlylegal.co.uk
Uh huh. Do try to be better. Bye.
nearlylegal.co.uk
I can see from your timeline how strongly you have responded to the Manchester attack. Bye.