the first time around i used the term "shithead superorganism" to describe it, like some kind of colony organism, like a portuguese man o'war which has a handful of different kinds of polyp; the polyp-in-chief does not have an ideology or master plan, it's just drifting around destroying things

Apparently, showing the scars on a formerly enslaved person’s body is “triggering”

To whom, exactly? Asa Earl Carter?

What the hell @moderation.bsky.app
This is not self harm.

This all kind of sounds like something for which you'd either want something emmet-esque, or a full blown language server… 🤔 only thing I could think of that'd also support using it in a web browser (kinda, via the Lapdev self-hosting code) would be Lapce (github.com/Lapce/Lapce) (well, or vscode 😂)

And apparently the router also broke for a day, lmao. Cf. www.wheresyoured.at/the-enshitti... as well as all the posts at simonwillison.net/tags/gpt-5/ (note: the seemingly only o4 related post there has a misleading title)

DANGER WILL ROBINSON!

1line tests STRONGLY mislead about capabilities of modelS! Router model sits inbetween, sends I/O to different models to save $

gpt-5-chat-latest ≠
gpt-5-2025-08-07 (+cutoff dates differ)

gpt-5-main-* ≠ gpt-5-thinking-*

cf. system card linked below

Cc @ceperez.bsky.social

In power talk lingo it means EXACTLY literally what it says:

"We do continuous valuation on behavioral surplus from your data"

Ain't like they say *honor* it, right?

Nice injoke+cognitive dissonance dodging mechanism innit 🤡

➡️how sociopath execs sith mind wrangle m.manager narcissists(≈M. Scott)

In power talk lingo it means EXACTLY literally what it says:

"We do continuous valuation on behavioral surplus from your data"

Ain't like they say *honor* it, right?

Nice injoke+cognitive dissonance dodging mechanism innit 🤡

➡️how sociopath execs sith mind wrangle m.manager narcissists(≈M. Scott)

i.e. SSL inspection, yes. Which when done entirely locally seems fine given sufficient prerequisites

Yeah I know, I meant more in terms of comeback prereq capability sufficiency considerations

I don't even disagree, yet:
OT1H, for one to even evaluate what that'd now imply, sufficiently clueful definitions of "browser"'d have to exist AFAICT
OTOH, "more appropriate" seems like an isomorphic-to-"a bit pregnant" oxymoron
OTGH, Chromium, W3C, & Mozilla trajectories leave little choice, no? 😕

…OpenWebAuth…? 🤔

🤔 joinfediverse.wiki/The_Zotlabs_... 🤔

Privoxy recently grew SSL inspection:

www.privoxy.org/announce.txt

So… 🤵🍷