Nwamaka R. Okany
@nrokany.bsky.social
International Lawyer| Lecturer| Researcher
@UvA_Amsterdam
Formerly: Visiting Fellow @Lauterpacht_Ctr
Public International Law | Investment Arbitration | SOEs
@UvA_Amsterdam
Formerly: Visiting Fellow @Lauterpacht_Ctr
Public International Law | Investment Arbitration | SOEs
Reposted by Nwamaka R. Okany
I'm actually a bit surprised at the lawsuit since the agreement, as far as I know, is a MOU. Perhaps a reminder that the title of an int'l agreement says nothing about its legally binding nature?
January 28, 2026 at 8:18 PM
I'm actually a bit surprised at the lawsuit since the agreement, as far as I know, is a MOU. Perhaps a reminder that the title of an int'l agreement says nothing about its legally binding nature?
Reposted by Nwamaka R. Okany
Ah - the MoU was replaced by a treaty. But I for one thought it was one weird MoU
January 28, 2026 at 8:21 PM
Ah - the MoU was replaced by a treaty. But I for one thought it was one weird MoU
I'm actually a bit surprised at the lawsuit since the agreement, as far as I know, is a MOU. Perhaps a reminder that the title of an int'l agreement says nothing about its legally binding nature?
January 28, 2026 at 8:18 PM
I'm actually a bit surprised at the lawsuit since the agreement, as far as I know, is a MOU. Perhaps a reminder that the title of an int'l agreement says nothing about its legally binding nature?