Nancy S Vann
banner
nsvann.bsky.social
Nancy S Vann
@nsvann.bsky.social
President Safe Energy Rights Group
Keep radioactive isotopes & fossil fuels in the ground not in our air and water!
Columbia University; Yale Law; Founder & first editor-in-chief Yale Law & Policy Review
Retired Wall Street lawyer & whistleblower
Nor will a full-size nuke plant like the one Gov Hochul has instructed the NY Power Authority to build!

Nuclear plants are the MOST expensive way to produce electricity - and their 10-15 year implementation time means 8+ additional years of greenhouse gas for the nuclear option compared to solar!
November 22, 2025 at 6:24 PM
The main purpose for ‘carbon capture’ - beyond obtaining subsidies - is to enable the continuation of fossil fuel production while pretending to address climate change.

Oh - and did they mention that much of that captured carbon is used to produce MORE fossil fuels?
November 22, 2025 at 6:12 PM
If only post-menopausal women were valued in society . . .

Oh well, infants, children and women don’t count for radiation exposure limits either - just young healthy ‘reference man’ clones.

And Trump wants to make that even worse:

thebulletin-org.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/thebulle...
Trump's new radiation exposure limits could be 'catastrophic' for women and girls
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission may soon loosen radiation exposure safety standards at nuclear plants and operations. Experts warn the general public is unsafe.
thebulletin-org.cdn.ampproject.org
November 22, 2025 at 6:07 PM
I’ve been busy with folks working to oppose the reopening of zombie nukes (including a threat at Indian Point!) so haven’t had much time for posting

Great to see all the info sources you’ve identified - will be sharing the ones I missed with our community!

And a happy Thanksgiving to you as well 🌟
November 22, 2025 at 5:57 PM
We do need to take individual actions to address climate change - but the emphasis on governmental & institutional actions/solutions is understandable.

Before seatbelt laws, individuals didn’t have that option for improving their own safety.

Where gas hookups are mandatory, like in NY, the same.
November 22, 2025 at 5:42 PM
When one or two companies own a huge percentage of crucial infrastructure - like communications satellites or media outlets - they gain extortionate influence and near veto power over attempts to rein them in.

Hopefully social/alternate media can act as a counterbalance. Unsubscribe.

Keep posting!
November 22, 2025 at 5:28 PM
The demise of antitrust law (killed by Robert Bork) has led to many of the problems that now seem unsolvable.

‘Too Big to Fail’ was already recognized during the 2008 financial crisis - but wasn’t addressed as a root cause.

Lina Kahn at the FTC was on track to bring it back - but Trump happened.
November 22, 2025 at 5:20 PM
The company that’s working on reviving the zombie Three Mile Island plant is well aware of how alarming that is. And of course they don’t want public attention to the project.

First Step: Rename it the ‘Crane Clean Energy Center’

www.nrc.gov/info-finder/...
Christopher M. Crane Clean Energy Center | Nuclear Regulatory Commission
www.nrc.gov
November 22, 2025 at 4:45 PM
At both Palisades & Indian Point, the prior owners closed the plants because they were unprofitable & also needed expensive repairs

Years of shutdown left Palisades in even worse condition - with only the prospect of subsidies as an incentive for reopening & the potential for catastrophic meltdown!
November 22, 2025 at 4:32 PM
P.S. It’s also referred to as a ‘Protection Racket’ - which saves folks the trouble of creating a problem - and is becoming increasingly popular across all areas of our current life: “nice windows there - it would be a shame if anything happened to them”
November 22, 2025 at 4:14 PM
Some messages promoting technical solutions do point out that the problem is implementation - not the search for ‘correctives’ like carbon capture, etc

Jacobson’s ‘No Miracles Needed’ provides existing tech paths to ‘just saying no’ to fossil fuels.

Olympic scale effort needed for action on them!
November 20, 2025 at 5:25 PM
Hard to believe that people are still claiming that gas (methane) is a ‘bridge fuel’ despite the fact that it’s ~80 times worse as a greenhouse gas over a 20 year period.

How long do they think we have to avoid catastrophic effects and irreversible tipping points?
November 20, 2025 at 5:08 PM
What total percentage of ‘us’ watches them?

More than the number that still approve of Trump?

I would guess that a higher percentage avoids them completely - but unlike political polls, no one asks us if we ‘strongly disagree’

Both demographics are worrying however and could certainly be related
November 20, 2025 at 4:43 PM
Followed in hopes of finding out what science is so relevant as to attract terrorists.
November 3, 2025 at 4:41 PM
Isn’t creating a problem and then demanding payment to fix the problem called ‘extortion’?
November 3, 2025 at 4:27 PM
Or for a fancier trip they could visit the closed San Onofre nuclear plant in California where similar coastal storage of the highly radioactive fuel waste is located.

Long after the plant stopped making money, the problem is still not resolved.

www.samuellawrencefoundation.org/_files/ugd/6...
www.samuellawrencefoundation.org
November 3, 2025 at 4:06 PM
They are going to censure people for revenge activities and defamation?

Can we move up the food chain on that one?
November 3, 2025 at 3:47 PM
I haven’t seen any flying pigs yet.
November 3, 2025 at 3:41 PM
I see your tsunami evacuation route - and raise you a nuclear plant emergency evacuation bus stop!
November 1, 2025 at 8:08 AM
Anyone wonder what else they might not have considered?
How about: A way to safely store the highly radioactive waste for the hundreds of thousands of years that it will remain deadly?!
November 1, 2025 at 8:03 AM
Nice that people are finally noticing this.
Would be even nicer if the GOP would 'Just Say No'!
November 1, 2025 at 7:58 AM
Me too!
In both senses of the phrase.
October 29, 2025 at 8:46 PM