I don’t think that conflicts with the skeet you quoted. But I disagree that coming out against ICE is a risk. On the immigration front specifically, “these deportations are raising grocery prices” is a damn good argument

2026 is looking like a year when any swing seat will be a layup for Dems

They didn't protect Jamal Bowman

Just making things a bit more difficult for American tourists would probably get upper income Americans up in arms

Okay. Sorry for making you answer the question again, I’m sure that gets annoying, but appreciate the response.

Eric Adams is the Republican Eric Adams

I think you want to talk about the story that is in the news. Talk about ICE while they’re terrorizing Minneapolis and affordability other times. The problem is they don’t WANT to talk about ICE so they pivot away from it to another topic. It makes them seem braindead

The problem is Republicans lowered taxes on Americans but that was counteracted by businesses hoarding their profits for themselves. Individuals making over $100k annually should probably pay more taxes but there’s a huge chunk of the population that can’t afford to.

What was his take on Gaza?

It was mostly ignorance, right? They told themselves that the economy would be better and they’d just ignore the news and tweets.

Still horror if the pension fund invests in private equity and crypto

I grew up Christian and read the Gospels many times and still didn't make the connection. Most people who call themselves Christians probably wouldn't either.

There was a reason: to prevent the big tech hearing scheduled for that day

I think a large part of that comes from House members being more accountable to voters than Senates members. I don’t completely hate him as speaker, though, since he wasn’t openly hostile with progressives like Pelosi and any other option would probably be worse.

What Democrat would have voted no on the subsidies