Oliver Colander
@olivercolander.bsky.social
Their baguettes are also lights out.
December 11, 2025 at 9:21 PM
Their baguettes are also lights out.
His turn on ‘Brockmire’ may be his best work in baseball.
December 10, 2025 at 8:05 PM
His turn on ‘Brockmire’ may be his best work in baseball.
Oh, I agree. I think a claim to ownership of a town’s character by virtue of having been there “first” is absurd on its face, but it falls all the way apart once the downstream effect is de facto gatekeeping of critical infrastructure.
December 10, 2025 at 8:01 PM
Oh, I agree. I think a claim to ownership of a town’s character by virtue of having been there “first” is absurd on its face, but it falls all the way apart once the downstream effect is de facto gatekeeping of critical infrastructure.
Not that it matters, but I’d bet dollars to donuts she is talking about a fast-growing commuter town that sits directly on the Metro North and not some quiet hamlet in the northwestern corner of the state.
December 10, 2025 at 7:51 PM
Not that it matters, but I’d bet dollars to donuts she is talking about a fast-growing commuter town that sits directly on the Metro North and not some quiet hamlet in the northwestern corner of the state.
Whoring for Big Pear now, Ben?
December 10, 2025 at 6:29 PM
Whoring for Big Pear now, Ben?
Count Von Count-ass Italians
December 10, 2025 at 3:13 PM
Count Von Count-ass Italians
Say what you will about David Shor, at least he actually worked in politics before turning into a malevolent know-it-all prick.
December 10, 2025 at 2:18 PM
Say what you will about David Shor, at least he actually worked in politics before turning into a malevolent know-it-all prick.
“Live to fight another day” is not just a metaphor.
December 9, 2025 at 11:56 PM
“Live to fight another day” is not just a metaphor.
In the absence of real pushback, the assumption needs to be that the interviewer likes Trump and agrees with what he does. Bad-faith interviews deserve the presumption of negative intent.
December 9, 2025 at 6:27 PM
In the absence of real pushback, the assumption needs to be that the interviewer likes Trump and agrees with what he does. Bad-faith interviews deserve the presumption of negative intent.
Move here and vote. Otherwise 🤫
December 9, 2025 at 5:28 PM
Move here and vote. Otherwise 🤫
Where in the city do you live?
December 9, 2025 at 4:33 PM
Where in the city do you live?
Imagine the smell after a few vigorous sets. Bear meat and breast milk seeping out of every pore.
December 9, 2025 at 2:33 AM
Imagine the smell after a few vigorous sets. Bear meat and breast milk seeping out of every pore.
Snapchat had/has a feature on its map function that would not only disclose your location but infer when you are sleeping. What possible purpose this serves outside of inviting calamity escapes me.
December 8, 2025 at 11:34 PM
Snapchat had/has a feature on its map function that would not only disclose your location but infer when you are sleeping. What possible purpose this serves outside of inviting calamity escapes me.
Willingness to exercise in an airport is perfect way to screen for psychopathy, actually.
December 8, 2025 at 8:58 PM
Willingness to exercise in an airport is perfect way to screen for psychopathy, actually.
Like, did *I* enjoy the five-minute throwaway conversation in OUATIH featuring Timothy Olyphant as James Stacy talking about 60s Western series no one under age 45 has ever heard of? Hell yes. I am not the right barometer, though, and a more disciplined filmmaker probably would have cut that scene.
December 8, 2025 at 8:10 PM
Like, did *I* enjoy the five-minute throwaway conversation in OUATIH featuring Timothy Olyphant as James Stacy talking about 60s Western series no one under age 45 has ever heard of? Hell yes. I am not the right barometer, though, and a more disciplined filmmaker probably would have cut that scene.
I like Tarantino, but his aesthetic is particularly vulnerable to expiration, i.e. if you aren’t either aware or a fan of the rapidly aging cultural references infusing his work, you probably don’t care much about him. PTA’s films show more range and greater resilience and I think QT resents it.
December 8, 2025 at 8:07 PM
I like Tarantino, but his aesthetic is particularly vulnerable to expiration, i.e. if you aren’t either aware or a fan of the rapidly aging cultural references infusing his work, you probably don’t care much about him. PTA’s films show more range and greater resilience and I think QT resents it.
Far smarter people than I are taking this to task, but I will say that justifying the worst possible outcome for having potentially misjudged a cultural moment feels like a real gamble for someone so visibly Nazi-adjacent.
December 8, 2025 at 7:13 PM
Far smarter people than I are taking this to task, but I will say that justifying the worst possible outcome for having potentially misjudged a cultural moment feels like a real gamble for someone so visibly Nazi-adjacent.
In every way that matters, Carlson has always been a textbook Nazi: arrogant despite his mediocrity, gleefully vindictive, and wholeheartedly proud of his hypocrisy because he never expects to be held to account for it.
December 7, 2025 at 11:54 PM
In every way that matters, Carlson has always been a textbook Nazi: arrogant despite his mediocrity, gleefully vindictive, and wholeheartedly proud of his hypocrisy because he never expects to be held to account for it.
He’s extraordinarily dangerous for this exact reason: he can make anything sound reasonable to anyone unwilling or unable to interrogate his arguments, the base of which change depending on where he sees opportunity for himself. He’s also smart enough to know which audiences won’t do that work.
December 7, 2025 at 11:51 PM
He’s extraordinarily dangerous for this exact reason: he can make anything sound reasonable to anyone unwilling or unable to interrogate his arguments, the base of which change depending on where he sees opportunity for himself. He’s also smart enough to know which audiences won’t do that work.