Paul Mainwood
@paulmainwood.bsky.social
4.5K followers 300 following 1.1K posts
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
paulmainwood.bsky.social
Honduras? ("Depths" in Spanish).
paulmainwood.bsky.social
How long do we have to wait before starting the conspiracy theory again? How about a round hour?
atrupar.com
Trump is now 40 minutes late and counting. Naval cadets still standing around in total and increasingly uncomfortable silence.
paulmainwood.bsky.social
Their cartoonists get it right though.

bsky.app/profile/poli...
politicalcartoon.bsky.social
Ella Baron @EBaronCartoons on the #manchesterterrorattack #synagogeattack @Guardian – political cartoon gallery in London original-political-cartoon.com
paulmainwood.bsky.social
This chart (from the Guardian) seems somewhat misleading.
There are around 13x more Muslims than Jews in England and Wales.
So these numbers represent a >10x higher rate of offences against Jews; an astonishing >1 in 100 having suffered a religiously motivated hate crime last year.
paulmainwood.bsky.social
Just straws in the wind, perhaps. But it’s been a while since there’s been any of those.
paulmainwood.bsky.social
First politically hopeful day in a while: Starmer starting to call out corrosive xenophobia and racism for what they are; at least one judge absolutely incinerating attempts to suppress free speech in the US; and their military visibly dismissing Hegseth as a confused, drunken embarrassment.
paulmainwood.bsky.social
Horrible case. Meadow squared a 1 in 8,500 chance of a cot-death, and told a jury there was a 1 in 73m chance of two in the same family, so Sally Clark must have murdered her own children. She served three years, won an appeal, came out a shattered shell of herself, and drank herself to death.
paulmainwood.bsky.social
In general, finding an editorial in the Lancet, dripping with arrogance and defending some harrumphing pillar (Meadow, Wakefield, PACE, Macchiarini) is a strong indicator that they are about to withdraw the paper/resign in disgrace/be struck off.

Best reverse indicator in medical research.
paulmainwood.bsky.social
Consistently on the very worst side of everything. Published bullshit articles defending Roy Meadow (paediatrician who falsely secured convictions of mothers for killing their children because he - and they - can't understand conditional probability).

Editor appears to just ignore all consequences.
paulmainwood.bsky.social
Fun to read the: "Gosh, how unfortunate that there were all these lies, that ten of the original authors have written a withdrawal notice and admitted there's no evidence for a link, but I am the editor of the Lancet and am never wrong" 2004 article now. www.thelancet.com/journals/lan...
A statement by the editors of The Lancet
On February 18, 2004, serious allegations of research misconduct concerning an article by Dr Andrew Wakefield and colleagues published in The Lancet in February, 1998,1 were brought to the attention o...
www.thelancet.com
paulmainwood.bsky.social
Much of the British media were awful here, but there was some good. Sunday Times articles by Brian Deer did a lot to bust the whole thing open.

Worst offender was the one who should have known best: The fucking Lancet.

(Editor absurdly defended the paper, retraction took 12 years, still in post)
beijingpalmer.bsky.social
the British media still hasn't done the proper level of shame it needs to about this
prunesqualler.bsky.social
Bad science journalism propagated the myth that the MMR vaccine causes autism
paulmainwood.bsky.social
I thought of the terrible rebooted Star Trek "Into Darkness", where an early plot point is a (written) rule if there's a terrorist attack of a certain kind, then the entire Starfleet command structure must meet in a particular room in San Francisco, so the villain can attack it with a helicopter.
paulmainwood.bsky.social
As someone who sometimes feels like the world is moving bewilderingly fast, there’s nothing like going to this page to make me feel that there are at least some unchangeable constants out there.
www.theguardian.com/index/contri...
Contributors | The Guardian
Latest Contributors news, comment and analysis from the Guardian, the world's leading liberal voice
www.theguardian.com
paulmainwood.bsky.social
Really puzzled as to what the story is.

Apparently reasonable bill for works ... exists?

Is the implication that the works are needed, but the bill is too high?
Or that the works aren't needed at all, and so this is a waste of money?
paulmainwood.bsky.social
Ah, then I am sorry to have misunderstood.

Would very much like to know the point you were making.
Reposted by Paul Mainwood
paulmainwood.bsky.social
Both of course are down to declining MMR rates, but the drivers behind these appear somewhat different. Britain’s rates are strongly associated with ethnicity and largely independent of political affiliation. US vice versa, though there are strong elements of access in both countries.
paulmainwood.bsky.social
The WHO counts a country as having eliminated measles if it has no transmission for 12 months (i.e., you can have imported cases).

The UK lost its “measles eliminated” status in 2019, the US will lose its in 2025.
www.cdc.gov/measles/data...
Measles Cases and Outbreaks
Find the latest numbers of confirmed U.S. measles cases. CDC updates this page weekly.
www.cdc.gov
paulmainwood.bsky.social
The first time I’ve heard the definition of democracy as “a system in which the ruling party loses elections” and I like it a great deal.