M. Alejandra Petino Zappala
@petinozappala.bsky.social
28 followers 9 following 160 posts
hopefully monstruous evolutionary biologist transitioning into HPS 🇦🇷 in 🇩🇪 https://www.researchgate.net/profile/M-Alejandra-Petino-Zappala
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
petinozappala.bsky.social
Today @dsbrooks.bsky.social and I hosted our symposium about conceptual ambiguity at #epsa25, with talks by us, Freek Oude Maatman and Markus Eronen (no pictures of me but you can see my intro slide) 😉
Reposted by M. Alejandra Petino Zappala
petinozappala.bsky.social
yesterday at #ishpssb2025‬ I presented my work on JM Rendel's attempts to reunite genetics and developmental biology!
You can read the paper here:
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
petinozappala.bsky.social
Thanks to you for your talk and the discussions during the breaks! Amazing workshop really
petinozappala.bsky.social
I was thrilled to take part in the 43rd Altenberg workshop on Conrad Hal Waddington at the KLI! Thanks to @alejandrofabregastejeda.com and @fvergara-silva.bsky.social for being such great organizers! (pun very much intended)
petinozappala.bsky.social
Salió publicado nuestro Informe técnico sobre evaluación genética preimplantatoria en Argentina, volumen para el que he contribuido un ensayo sobre PGT-P (test genético poligénico preimplantatorio):
https://t.co/bKSokaHsCr https://t.co/deqNDZY2Vf
petinozappala.bsky.social
(The pictures used in this thread were taken by Joe Felsenstein and reproduced with his permission).
petinozappala.bsky.social
Finally, the main historical point: it is quite widely contended that Waddington left no heirs and that attempts to include development into evolutionary biology were almost non existent until the 80s (with Evo-Devo)…
petinozappala.bsky.social
He also said in 1983 that “the early impact of these findings on evolutionary theory seems now to be forgotten”. This is partly true, but I also show some of these ideas appeared in genetics books without proper citation. 👀
petinozappala.bsky.social
More interestingly, he proposed that a severe (genetic or environmental) disruption could disturb development and lead to “outbursts of radically new forms” in populations. Such forms could give rise to new populations. Sounds familiar?
petinozappala.bsky.social
A really interesting detail are the implications of this model for macroevolution. Rendel sadly did not expand on this more than a couple of paragraphs in his book, but he explained canalization in terms of organisms as integrated systems.
petinozappala.bsky.social
Canalization exists because the developmental system is controlled to buffer a certain amount of variation. However, when the perturbations are great, phenotypic variation will appear.
petinozappala.bsky.social
Rendel explained that genetic and environmental changes caused variation in ‘Make’. However, there is a range in which changes in ‘Make’ do not result in phenotypic change. This is the canalized range. https://t.co/4yaX9TtoeQ
petinozappala.bsky.social
Even coming from genetics, Rendel did stress that changes in ‘Make’ could be caused by genetic and environmental factors in ways that were impossible to differentiate. He used a very interesting metaphor to describe this: https://t.co/EZlF03x5ln
petinozappala.bsky.social
Reasons for this might be that the model was quite complex, abstract and statistically difficult to analyze. He also posited a theoretical variable he called “Make” which was at the time impossible to quantify directly. https://t.co/SZqUUcj8Cy
petinozappala.bsky.social
Rendel is mostly cited as someone who empirically studied the phenomenon of phenotypic canalization during his years in Edinburgh, under Waddington. Later he went to CSIRO (Australia) where he worked on breeding, for what he is also quite recognized there. https://t.co/nZWEMdHgTf
petinozappala.bsky.social
My first historical paper is out in SHPS!! In my stay in @RotoRub I analyzed the theoretical contributions of James Meadows Rendel, a figure mostly known by his experimental work, to genetics and evolutionary biology:
https://t.co/xQ0xLB55IZ
petinozappala.bsky.social
No podemos dejar pasar confusiones que pueden avalar ideas vetustas y dañinas sobre la genética como determinante de las características y/o formas de vida de las personas, la posibilidad de su desarrollo y mucho menos del determinismo biológico como causa de la pobreza.
petinozappala.bsky.social
Por lo tanto no existe tal cosa como una "genética de la pobreza". El artículo de PNAS, de hecho, nunca se refiere a modificaciones en la secuencia ni ningún tipo de cambio genético heredable.
petinozappala.bsky.social
En el artículo “Socioeconomic inequalities in molecular risk for chronic diseases observed in Young adulthood” de Shanahan y colaboradores (PNAS) se habla de cambios en la expresión de los genes y su correlato con la desigualdad socioeconómica.
petinozappala.bsky.social
Desde el plantel docente del curso de Genética Humana de @Exactas_UBA expresamos nuestra preocupación por las versiones periodísticas acerca de la "genética de la pobreza" y explicamos por qué son una interpretación equivocada de un hallazgo científico:
https://t.co/KM4ItXyFl1
petinozappala.bsky.social
teaching w/xkcd: type I error inflation https://t.co/QJ2QA8ZO1D
petinozappala.bsky.social
teaching w/memes:
no correlation 😶 - yes correlation 🙂 https://t.co/AZ4pSz2xrP
petinozappala.bsky.social
Hoy presenté el trabajo que hicimos junto con @santiagombv1 y @GuilleFolguera en el taller "Una triple hélice" en memoria de Richard Lewontin ✊
https://t.co/dB5hqQQI7C