Daniel S. Brooks
@dsbrooks.bsky.social
240 followers 190 following 20 posts
Philosopher & Historian of Biology and Neuroscience Associate editor for Acta Biotheoretica (https://link.springer.com/journal/10441) https://www.danielsbrooks.com/
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Daniel S. Brooks
petinozappala.bsky.social
Today @dsbrooks.bsky.social and I hosted our symposium about conceptual ambiguity at #epsa25, with talks by us, Freek Oude Maatman and Markus Eronen (no pictures of me but you can see my intro slide) 😉
Reposted by Daniel S. Brooks
alejandrofabregastejeda.com
Organismal agency is one of today's liveliest debates in the life sciences. Our volume—published a year ago—brings historians, philosophers & scientists into the conversation, offering the kind of nuanced treatment this complex issue deserves 👇 www.routledge.com/The-Riddle-o... #HPS #evosky #philsky
Book cover of "The Riddle of Organismal Agency: New Historical and Philosophical Reflections" (Routledge, 2024). The book belongs to the "History and Philosophy of Biology" series. The editors are Alejandro Fábregas-Tejeda, Jan Baedke, Guido I. Prieto, and Gregory Radick. The design features a geometric pattern of interlocking, multicolored triangles in shades of red, yellow, teal, white, and pink. The Routledge logo appears in the lower right corner.
Reposted by Daniel S. Brooks
dsbrooks.bsky.social
This paper was nine (!) years in the making, beginning as a side project about methodological disputes in philosophy of science before becoming a committed attempt to engage in a historically rich vein of conceptual theory in biology. It ended up at almost 19K words (!!).
dsbrooks.bsky.social
*Or rather referred to organicist ideas as 'vitalism.'
dsbrooks.bsky.social
Pushback against the organicists in mainstream philosophy of science, especially by Ernest Nagel and his student Morton Beckner, was harsh. They dismissed organization as an unspecified concept that promoted conviction over rational argument. Others like Hempel ignored organicism entirely*
Reposted by Daniel S. Brooks
kohngregory.bsky.social
Devastated to hear this. His books shaped how I thought about development, evolution, history, and science in general. I corresponded with him during grad school when it was less acceptable to be a Marxist in science. His encouragement kept me in the game, and made the field seem less lonely.
rebeccasear.bsky.social
Steven Rose was a neuroscientist and critic of genetic determinist views of human behaviour; he was also a founder member of the now defunct British Society for Social Responsbility in Science (which perhaps needs to be resurrected…) www.theguardian.com/science/2025...
Steven Rose obituary
Neuroscientist, author, political activist and advocate for social responsibility in science
www.theguardian.com
Reposted by Daniel S. Brooks
acfischer.bsky.social
@epsaphilsci.bsky.social junior scholar online series came to an end yesterday with a great talk about "How to deal with Imposter Syndrome and self doubt" by Azita Chellapo, @dsbrooks.bsky.social, @mjbuedo.bsky.social and @abigailnd.bsky.social. Thanks for the personal stories and helpful advices! 💐
dsbrooks.bsky.social
We saved a baby squirrel that had overheated and was lying on the sidewalk. We gave the little guy some water and they perked right up: they climbed up on me, first on my shoulder, then decided to hang out on my head to collect themselves. After a bit they jumped off my head into a nearby tree.
Reposted by Daniel S. Brooks
veniceevodevo.bsky.social
DEADLINE EXTENDED to Apr 7 (midnight, CET)

For those of you who struggled with the submission system (we do to!), and those that didn't realize the deadline was on midnight **Central European Time**. 😉

Submit your motivation letter & CV at the link below:

#VeniceEvoDevo
dsbrooks.bsky.social
Deadline extended to April 7th -- Please consider applying!
dsbrooks.bsky.social
Really looking forward to this year's EMBO|FEBS Lecture Course: Emergence & Evolution of Multi-Level Regulatory Systems in Venice this year (meetings.embo.org/event/25-mul...). Applications for participants open until 31 March! #phlsci in #evobio & #devbio
Reposted by Daniel S. Brooks
veniceevodevo.bsky.social
Deadline is TOMORROW night (Mar 31).
Not tonight, like wrongly announced at first.

And that's good news: because you get another 24hrs to apply, if you have not yet done so!

What are you waiting for!? 😉

Registration link below:
Reposted by Daniel S. Brooks
jgps.bsky.social
The concept of 'downward causation' has faced many strong critiques. In her recent 📄 @yashaddad.bsky.social argues that, when adopting an interventionist view of causation and a levels of organization framework, we can explanatorily use the notion 👇 link.springer.com/article/10.1... #philsci #hpbio
Promotional p;icture with the abstract of the article “Demystifying Downward Causation” by Yasmin Haddad, published in the Journal for General Philosophy of Science (JGPS).
dsbrooks.bsky.social
Really looking forward to this year's EMBO|FEBS Lecture Course: Emergence & Evolution of Multi-Level Regulatory Systems in Venice this year (meetings.embo.org/event/25-mul...). Applications for participants open until 31 March! #phlsci in #evobio & #devbio
dsbrooks.bsky.social
More information and updates on the lecture course will be provided by following @veniceevodevo.bsky.social as well as from the instructors (including myself!) and the organizers -- The deadline for applications is 31 March, 2025!
dsbrooks.bsky.social
The course will tackle questions like how levels originate and integrate in development and evolution, what interactions exist between levels, how to measure and manipulate biological systems across multiple scales, and how to model feedback across different levels.
dsbrooks.bsky.social
The venue is in Venice, Italy, and the meeting spans the whole week from 17 – 22 August 2025. Speaking from experience, these meetings are a excellent source for enduring and dynamic dialogues. This year the meeting will be feature levels of organization in #devbio, #evodevo, #evobio, and others!
Reposted by Daniel S. Brooks
kohngregory.bsky.social
This is an interesting and provocative new paper by DiFrisco and Gawne that critiques the agential stance in evolution in good faith. Both authors are incisive thinkers, and we should take their considerations to heart. That said, I do have some unstructured thoughts I will list below.
dsbrooks.bsky.social
That is, scales do not develop or evolve, but the things that occupy scales do. Attending to scales, however, offers major benefits to characterizing levels, esp. when we ditch the expectation that levels are unidimensional loci in space-time (an expedient assumption used to criticize the notion).
dsbrooks.bsky.social
For one thing, while complementary and perhaps in some sense inseparable, the terms refer to completely distinct things. Scale refers to a resolution in space or time while levels refer to classes of structures or processes that occupy these spatiotemporal resolutions.