Philip Murray
@philipmurray.bsky.social
840 followers 420 following 270 posts
Law lecturer @robinsoncollege.bsky.social / @cambridgelaw.bsky.social.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Philip Murray
profmarkelliott.bsky.social
A new paper from Philip Murray and me: 'In Defence of Classical Administrative Law'. We argue that the voidness of unlawful administrative acts is central to the rule of law and that recent challenges to that view can and should be resisted.

publiclawforeveryone.com/2025/09/16/i...
In Defence of Classical Administrative Law
In a recently completed paper, Philip Murray and I develop a defence of what we term the classical account of administrative law. The question with which we are centrally concerned is whether (as t…
publiclawforeveryone.com
Reposted by Philip Murray
philipmurray.bsky.social
But there's a clear line between posts on which a moderator might intervene and posts which require police action. Just because someone complains to the police about a distasteful post doesn't mean the police should act. Pinning this on a lack of moderation on X seems a stretch.
philipmurray.bsky.social
"A single human soul is worth more than the whole universe of material goods. There is nothing higher than the immortal soul, save God. With respect to the eternal destiny of the soul, society exists for each person and is subordinated to it." — Jacques Maritain, The Person and the Common Good
Reposted by Philip Murray
legalmusings.bsky.social
We do not live in a tyranny. Using armed officers to arrest a man at an airport over a series of tweets is the sort of thing one would expect to happen in Russia or North Korea.

People will remember this when the police next claim to be under resourced.
Reposted by Philip Murray
legalmusings.bsky.social
Reflecting on the Graham Lineham story this morning, unless there is something more that hasn’t been reported, assuming that the Met Police was responsible for this ‘operation’ I think the Commissioner should resign.
Reposted by Philip Murray
Reposted by Philip Murray
benansell.bsky.social
On where UK Bluesky does have a blind spot, I haven’t seen anything on here about the vandalism of Policy Exchange’s office (see below). This kind of stuff should be called out and criticised and I’m very happy to do so.
philipmurray.bsky.social
I'm afraid to say the Bodleian is significantly nicer to work in than Cambridge's UL.
Reposted by Philip Murray
paulbernal.bsky.social
Let’s be clear. The problem is the Online Safety Act. It’s not Labour, it’s not the Tories, it’s both of them. The act had cross party support.

The act is the biggest piece of censorship in the U.K. since the Second World War.
philipmurray.bsky.social
Yes, but a good one. I'd also be in favour of banning them from the armed forces (and maintaining the ban on voting). Let children be children, even if they're mature children.
philipmurray.bsky.social
16 year olds cannot marry.
Reposted by Philip Murray
profmarkelliott.bsky.social
As someone who couldn't have undertaken a PhD without funding, the AHRC scholarship I received (many years ago) was life-changing. It's incredibly concerning that the the next generation of prospective academics are being denied such opportunities. www.timeshighereducation.com/news/student...
‘Student-led’ AHRC PhD places ‘to fall by at least 60 per cent’
Internal modelling released under Freedom of Information enquiry reveals extent of PhD scholarship cuts, with academics fearing impact could be greater still
www.timeshighereducation.com
Reposted by Philip Murray
colmocinneide.bsky.social
Two quick points about today's Braverman/Prosperity Institute report on ECHR exit & the GFA.

(i) Advocating a return to the legal situation that applied in Northern Ireland in 1969 is an interesting choice of approach. (Cue the quote about the Bourbons forgetting nothing & learning nothing.)

1/2
Reposted by Philip Murray
lewisgrahamlaw.bsky.social
Another decision, this time from Scotland, on the "narrowly drawn" exceptions to the Cart ouster in the TCEA 2007:

www.bailii.org/scot/cases/S...

Gabriel Tan @finishedloading.bsky.social discussed a similar English court case here back in May:

administrativecourtblog.wordpress.com/2025/05/20/c...
Access denied
www.bailii.org
Reposted by Philip Murray
lewisgrahamlaw.bsky.social
Today's report by Suella Braverman on leaving the ECHR is, unsurprisingly, full of myths (the common law will protect us), lies (the ECHR stops us from having our desired immigration system) and exaggerations (human rights are incompatible with sovereignty).

It's not worth taking seriously.
Reposted by Philip Murray
stevepeers.bsky.social
Again - the reason the Irish government/nationalists in Northern Ireland wanted a reference to the ECHR in the Good Friday Agreement is that the European Court of Human Rights had held the UK accountable for human rights abuses in NI - whereas "domestic UK and common law principles" had not
colinmurray.bsky.social
One does not simply... rewrite the Belfast/Good Friday Agreement.

😅😅😅😅😅...😭
philipmurray.bsky.social
were not intended as permanent features of the new settlement is unconvincing. There is, of course, an argument to be had on ECHR withdrawal. But that this will involve a significant rewriting of the Belfast Agreement, rather than just some cosmetic tweaking, needs to be squarely confronted.
philipmurray.bsky.social
On first impressions, Suella Braverman's ECHR report rests on an overly selective history of the ECHR's place in the Belfast Agreement. To say that commitments in the agreement to incorporate the ECHR into Northern Irish law and to limit the Assembly’s ability to legislate contrary to the ECHR ...
philipmurray.bsky.social
Alice is a good friend and I she'll be delighted by these comments!