Finally some context. I was confused why so many people were calling for Jonathan Ross to be imprisoned.
BTW Jonathan Ross is also a tv personality in the UK who is often a shitty person, but not criminally so
BTW Jonathan Ross is also a tv personality in the UK who is often a shitty person, but not criminally so
January 11, 2026 at 12:22 AM
Finally some context. I was confused why so many people were calling for Jonathan Ross to be imprisoned.
BTW Jonathan Ross is also a tv personality in the UK who is often a shitty person, but not criminally so
BTW Jonathan Ross is also a tv personality in the UK who is often a shitty person, but not criminally so
Didn’t the same thing happen in Afghanistan? Trumps team made a deal with the Taliban without the legitimate Afghan authorities being in the room, which led to the US withdrawal and the Taliban retaking control of the country.
How has he not learned his lesson?!
How has he not learned his lesson?!
November 26, 2025 at 10:01 AM
Didn’t the same thing happen in Afghanistan? Trumps team made a deal with the Taliban without the legitimate Afghan authorities being in the room, which led to the US withdrawal and the Taliban retaking control of the country.
How has he not learned his lesson?!
How has he not learned his lesson?!
I have answered this, multiple times. They were all AFAB. Do you need help with reading comprehension?
April 28, 2025 at 10:22 AM
I have answered this, multiple times. They were all AFAB. Do you need help with reading comprehension?
I wonder if her views of enby people have changed
April 28, 2025 at 10:14 AM
I wonder if her views of enby people have changed
And I have already stated what sex is. You don’t want to accept it, fine. You’re wrong, but you are free to disagree with me.
And this has everything to do with gender when you are erroneously conflating sex with gender.
And this has everything to do with gender when you are erroneously conflating sex with gender.
April 28, 2025 at 10:10 AM
And I have already stated what sex is. You don’t want to accept it, fine. You’re wrong, but you are free to disagree with me.
And this has everything to do with gender when you are erroneously conflating sex with gender.
And this has everything to do with gender when you are erroneously conflating sex with gender.
You do understand that gender =/= sex, right?
April 28, 2025 at 10:01 AM
You do understand that gender =/= sex, right?
@dissonancepod.bsky.social it seems the guys will be pleasantly surprised by this guy again. I think he really has exceeded their expectations
April 28, 2025 at 9:59 AM
@dissonancepod.bsky.social it seems the guys will be pleasantly surprised by this guy again. I think he really has exceeded their expectations
Nothing says all 3 are female but all 3 are AFAB.
Only one of these is able to make any affirmation one way or the other, the other 2 will remain AFAB as they cannot speak for themselves.
Only one of these is able to make any affirmation one way or the other, the other 2 will remain AFAB as they cannot speak for themselves.
April 28, 2025 at 9:52 AM
Nothing says all 3 are female but all 3 are AFAB.
Only one of these is able to make any affirmation one way or the other, the other 2 will remain AFAB as they cannot speak for themselves.
Only one of these is able to make any affirmation one way or the other, the other 2 will remain AFAB as they cannot speak for themselves.
I’m assuming you want me to say they have sexual reproductive organs *TYPICALLY* associated with the sex of female, but their reproductive organs does not dictate what sex they are.
April 28, 2025 at 9:42 AM
I’m assuming you want me to say they have sexual reproductive organs *TYPICALLY* associated with the sex of female, but their reproductive organs does not dictate what sex they are.
The decision is not a social decision. Not having children is in no way anything to do with society
April 28, 2025 at 9:35 AM
The decision is not a social decision. Not having children is in no way anything to do with society
You are making this determination based on being AFAB. Sex is far more complicated than what is between someone’s legs.
April 28, 2025 at 9:34 AM
You are making this determination based on being AFAB. Sex is far more complicated than what is between someone’s legs.
I have 4 children thank you very much, however my partner does not and it in no way affects her social status or impact upon society.
Whether someone does or does not have children is in no way a social decision
Whether someone does or does not have children is in no way a social decision
April 28, 2025 at 9:32 AM
I have 4 children thank you very much, however my partner does not and it in no way affects her social status or impact upon society.
Whether someone does or does not have children is in no way a social decision
Whether someone does or does not have children is in no way a social decision
How can no change in my circumstances change my entire interaction with society? Do you realise how ridiculous your statement is?
April 28, 2025 at 9:26 AM
How can no change in my circumstances change my entire interaction with society? Do you realise how ridiculous your statement is?
What is between your legs does not dictate what sex you are, those are typical sex characteristics and is generally what is used to determine as assigned gender at birth. Sex and gender are not synonyms.
April 28, 2025 at 9:25 AM
What is between your legs does not dictate what sex you are, those are typical sex characteristics and is generally what is used to determine as assigned gender at birth. Sex and gender are not synonyms.
Is in no way a social decision and in no way does one’s personal choice impact society in any way, shape, or form. To claim otherwise is to make assumptions about someone’s worth to society.
April 28, 2025 at 9:12 AM
Is in no way a social decision and in no way does one’s personal choice impact society in any way, shape, or form. To claim otherwise is to make assumptions about someone’s worth to society.
Swyer Syndrome is someone who has XY chromosomes, typically something that denotes they are male but also develops a vagina, womb, fallopian tubes and under developed ovaries. They often require medical assistance to start puberty and are not often capable of producing eggs.
Not having children…
Not having children…
April 28, 2025 at 9:12 AM
Swyer Syndrome is someone who has XY chromosomes, typically something that denotes they are male but also develops a vagina, womb, fallopian tubes and under developed ovaries. They often require medical assistance to start puberty and are not often capable of producing eggs.
Not having children…
Not having children…
Do you mean Swyer syndrome? It’s pretty disturbing you seem to be saying that a persons worth is directly associated with them having children, as if that must be the default and the assumption everyone must make.
April 28, 2025 at 8:56 AM
Do you mean Swyer syndrome? It’s pretty disturbing you seem to be saying that a persons worth is directly associated with them having children, as if that must be the default and the assumption everyone must make.
If people sign this petition it will let parliament know the British people do not support what is happening in the US to too many innocent people.
chng.it/fmv5Z52KqK
chng.it/fmv5Z52KqK
Stop Donald Trump from Addressing the UK Parliament
Can you spare a minute to help this campaign?
chng.it
April 27, 2025 at 12:34 PM
If people sign this petition it will let parliament know the British people do not support what is happening in the US to too many innocent people.
chng.it/fmv5Z52KqK
chng.it/fmv5Z52KqK
Ok, that one’s on me.
February 9, 2025 at 3:06 PM
Ok, that one’s on me.
And would like to hazard a guess at what those books contained? Ideas on how to effectively mortify the flesh.
If you’d like to engage in apologetics, please don’t bother with me.
If you’d like to engage in apologetics, please don’t bother with me.
February 9, 2025 at 3:05 PM
And would like to hazard a guess at what those books contained? Ideas on how to effectively mortify the flesh.
If you’d like to engage in apologetics, please don’t bother with me.
If you’d like to engage in apologetics, please don’t bother with me.
Not just analgesics, but also medication that could have saved people’s lives such as antibiotics, that is unless they converted to her faith voluntarily.
February 9, 2025 at 3:02 PM
Not just analgesics, but also medication that could have saved people’s lives such as antibiotics, that is unless they converted to her faith voluntarily.
I doubt it as that particular Teresa is known for hallucinating and not any great works.
However the Teresa of Calcutta is wrongfully known as someone who cared for the sick and dying.
Plus, when considering the others in that list (such as Dr MLK Jr), it is more likely to be a recent person.
However the Teresa of Calcutta is wrongfully known as someone who cared for the sick and dying.
Plus, when considering the others in that list (such as Dr MLK Jr), it is more likely to be a recent person.
February 9, 2025 at 3:01 PM
I doubt it as that particular Teresa is known for hallucinating and not any great works.
However the Teresa of Calcutta is wrongfully known as someone who cared for the sick and dying.
Plus, when considering the others in that list (such as Dr MLK Jr), it is more likely to be a recent person.
However the Teresa of Calcutta is wrongfully known as someone who cared for the sick and dying.
Plus, when considering the others in that list (such as Dr MLK Jr), it is more likely to be a recent person.