Antifa Nafo liaison, DFW region.
LightNews LightNews
Antifa Nafo liaison, DFW region.
@poliorcetes.bsky.social
200 followers 40 following 2.1K posts
Semper Fellas
Posts Replies Media Videos
Reposted by Antifa Nafo liaison, DFW region.
bft.wtf
Both the Paul brothers are crypto scammers. Andrew Tate is a crypto scammer. Donald Trump is a crypto scammer. Melania Trump is a crypto scammer.
December 21, 2025 at 10:14 PM
Stims and starvation, how inspired.
December 21, 2025 at 7:33 AM
Reposted by Antifa Nafo liaison, DFW region.
mikesgapingmaw.bsky.social
Watching him get his ass handed to him made my day.

bsky.app/profile/gadg...
gadget44027447.bsky.social Gadget @gadget44027447.bsky.social · 1d
🚨 Andrew Tate has been BATTERED and comprehensively beaten by a novice boxer, Chase DeMoor
December 21, 2025 at 1:27 AM
Reposted by Antifa Nafo liaison, DFW region.
drdietcoke.bsky.social
Turns out a decade of smoking cigars, podcasting, and punching out enslaved romanian women has not, in fact, made him an apex predator and he was defeated by a novice but prepared opponent
December 21, 2025 at 1:04 AM
This is like those crazy crypto predictions, they never come true and every year they create a new batch like nobody remembers last years.
December 21, 2025 at 7:19 AM
Hold steady lads, deploying more butter!
December 21, 2025 at 7:17 AM
Reposted by Antifa Nafo liaison, DFW region.
dontbashash.bsky.social
Her letter to the DOJ closes with: “The audacity of withholding my file while exposing my name cannot be overstated.”
December 20, 2025 Via Email U.S. Department of Justice Attn: DOJ Attorneys Responsible for Epstein Files Transparency Act Compliance From: Epstein survivor and reporting witness To Counsel: I am a survivor of Jeffrey Epstein. I write to place the Department of Justice on formal notice of a grave and indefensible violation arising from the December 19, 2025 release of records under the Epstein Files Transparency Act. In that release, my name and/or identifying information was disclosed publicly without proper redaction. At the same time -and astonishingly-the DOJ and FBI continue to withhold my own FBI file, despite the fact that: • I reported Jeffrey Epstein to the FBI in 2009; • I have an extensive FBI file arising from that report and related cooperation; • The FBI has confirmed, in writing, that my request remains under review for redactions under 5 U.S.C. §§ 552 and 552a, with an estimated completion date of February 2026; ano • Multiple United States Senators and Representatives, across parties and states, have formally advocated for the release of my file to me. The contradiction is extraordinary. The DOJ asserts that my own file requires prolonged review to determine whether redactions are appropriate -yet it had no difficulty publicly releasing my identity in a mass disclosure. I. The Epstein Files Transparency Act REQUIRED protection of victim identities The Epstein Files Transparency Act mandates disclosure of covered records while explicitly permitting-and requiring the redaction of victim-identifying information, including names and personally identifiable details, where disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Victim protection is not ancillary to the Act. It is a central statutory safeguard. The unredacted disclosure of my identity violated both the letter and purpose of the law and inflicted fresh harm on the very people Congress sought to protect. II. DOJ's position is internally contradictory and legally untenable According to the FBI's written communication to me in December 2025: "The request is presently assigned to a Disclosure Analyst who is reviewing the records to determine if any redactions are required pursuant to subsections of Title 5, U.S. Code, Section 552 and 552a." Thus, DOJ's position is that: • My own records, requested by me as the reporting victim, must be withheld pending careful redaction review; and • Yet my name could be disclosed publicly without protection. That position is not merely inconsistent-it is irrational, reckless, and incompatible with federal victim-protection obligations. IIII. Deterrence will not work - and will not excuse illegality If the unredacted release of my name, coupled with the continued withholding of my FBI file, was intended-explicitly or implicitly to deter, intimidate, or chill advocacy for the full release of the Epstein files, it has failed. I remain undeterred and unafraid. The American people are entitled to the full truth contained in the Epstein files, and Congress made clear that transparency must be delivered with protection for victims, not at their expense. This unlawful disclosure does not silence me. It does not frighten me. If anything, it has made me more resolved than ever to ensure the full, lawful release of the Epstein files. Victims are not intimidated by this conduct. We are demanding accountability for it. IV. This disclosure compounds prior governmental failure I did what victims are told to do. I reported Jeffrey Epstein to the FBI in 2009. The government failed to stop him then. It failed to protect victims for years. And now, under the banner of "transparency," it has exposed a reporting victim while continuing to withhold her own records. That is not transparency. It is institutional failure layered upon historic injustice. V. Legal exposure and oversight implications This incident raises serious issues under, inter alia: • The Epstein Files Transparency Act (failure to redact victim PII); • The Crime Victims' Rights Act (18 U.S.C. § 3771); • The Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. § 552a); and • DOJ's own public representations regarding victim protection in Epstein-related disclosures. I am actively evaluating Inspector General referral, congressional escalation, and civil remedies. VI. DEMANDS - Immediate corrective action required I demand the following actions without delay: 1. Immediate removal or correction of all publicly posted materials containing my unredacted identifying information. 2. Written confirmation within 24 hours identifying affected documents, duration of exposure, and corrective steps taken. 3. Preservation of all records related to this disclosure. 4. Referral of this incident to the DOJ Office of the Inspector General. 5. A written explanation reconciling the withholding of my FBI file with the public disclosure of my identity. VIl. Closing The audacity of withholding my file while exposing my name cannot be overstated. This letter constitutes formal notice. I expect immediate action, written confirmation, and accountability. I am attaching the FBI letter dated 18 December 2025 as well as multiple examples of the illegal releases of my name dated 19 December 2025. Respectfully, Epstein Survivor and 2009 FBI Reporting Witness
December 21, 2025 at 3:31 AM
Combat is easy drama, and a lot of early rpgs often became tactical miniatures wargames with lite roleplaying. Depends on your group.
December 20, 2025 at 2:05 PM
Cascoin flacks:
"Clearly she can't be on the run if she is leaving restaurant reviews for every meal"
December 20, 2025 at 7:54 AM
Reposted by Antifa Nafo liaison, DFW region.
kenwhite.bsky.social
There's actually a very unsettling array of these to choose from
December 20, 2025 at 12:50 AM
Nothing kills a conspiracy like lots of hugely redacted documents . . .
December 20, 2025 at 12:14 AM