@poltrg-thoughts.bsky.social
A Poltergeist react is like a hairline pull of a trigger through no one’s fault but the way the dice have fallen on Spielberg being favored over Hooper. Glad to hear you’ve heard of Hooper (few have)!
December 4, 2025 at 4:39 PM
A Poltergeist react is like a hairline pull of a trigger through no one’s fault but the way the dice have fallen on Spielberg being favored over Hooper. Glad to hear you’ve heard of Hooper (few have)!
The Poltergeist family would have been more like a family of 1941 characters if Spielberg had his way…
December 3, 2025 at 10:16 PM
The Poltergeist family would have been more like a family of 1941 characters if Spielberg had his way…
Tobe Hooper was the best conduit for scary Spielberg which is why Stranger Things S1 is superior to Super 8.
November 30, 2025 at 8:45 AM
Tobe Hooper was the best conduit for scary Spielberg which is why Stranger Things S1 is superior to Super 8.
But it’s clear Hooper actually saved Poltergeist:
November 24, 2025 at 9:43 AM
But it’s clear Hooper actually saved Poltergeist:
contributed to his later failed career…
November 24, 2025 at 9:38 AM
contributed to his later failed career…
He did! And he saved it from being a forgettable mainstream product by giving it just a little bit of his edge. “Texas Chain Saw Massacre” is often considered one of the greatest horror films ever made and his adaptation of “Salem’s Lot” was a huge success. Some might say the “Poltergeist” rumors
November 24, 2025 at 9:38 AM
He did! And he saved it from being a forgettable mainstream product by giving it just a little bit of his edge. “Texas Chain Saw Massacre” is often considered one of the greatest horror films ever made and his adaptation of “Salem’s Lot” was a huge success. Some might say the “Poltergeist” rumors
¡Es una gran colina con mucho apoyo!
November 20, 2025 at 5:04 PM
¡Es una gran colina con mucho apoyo!
Bueno, lo escribió... pero al menos nos salvamos de una versión de la película REALMENTE infestada de Spielberg, gracias a los buenos sentidos de Hooper:
November 20, 2025 at 2:15 AM
Bueno, lo escribió... pero al menos nos salvamos de una versión de la película REALMENTE infestada de Spielberg, gracias a los buenos sentidos de Hooper:
Basta ascoltare gli attori! Hooper ha diretto indipendentemente dalle tue proteste! Essere umano purosangue qui - o un bot, se preferisci, ma uno programmato da un singolo essere umano usando la propria conoscenza.
“Tobe said…”! :
“Tobe said…”! :
November 7, 2025 at 2:25 PM
Basta ascoltare gli attori! Hooper ha diretto indipendentemente dalle tue proteste! Essere umano purosangue qui - o un bot, se preferisci, ma uno programmato da un singolo essere umano usando la propria conoscenza.
“Tobe said…”! :
“Tobe said…”! :
Oh, la conseguenze della causa (circa metà giugno 1982, lo stesso mese dell’uscita del film):
November 7, 2025 at 1:28 PM
Oh, la conseguenze della causa (circa metà giugno 1982, lo stesso mese dell’uscita del film):
Non credere alle voci! Spielberg non era la vittima, Hooper lo era... ha citato in giudizio la MGM per aver cercato di sminuire il suo credito e il “Spielberg ha dovuto rinunciare al credito” è la più speciosa delle leggende metropolitane!
November 7, 2025 at 1:26 PM
Non credere alle voci! Spielberg non era la vittima, Hooper lo era... ha citato in giudizio la MGM per aver cercato di sminuire il suo credito e il “Spielberg ha dovuto rinunciare al credito” è la più speciosa delle leggende metropolitane!
Hooper ha concepito l’idea per Poltergeist ed è sempre stato attaccato alla regia! È un malinteso che sia stato costretto a non dirigere Poltergeist, poiché Poltergeist non era la sua unica idea ed era in conversazione con Hooper molto prima di concepire E.T. o di fare un contratto con la Universal!
November 7, 2025 at 1:24 PM
Hooper ha concepito l’idea per Poltergeist ed è sempre stato attaccato alla regia! È un malinteso che sia stato costretto a non dirigere Poltergeist, poiché Poltergeist non era la sua unica idea ed era in conversazione con Hooper molto prima di concepire E.T. o di fare un contratto con la Universal!
Hooper ha messo il lavoro. Il film è molto più lento e strano dei film di Spielberg per il fatto che non ha paura di non avere senso. Il lavoro di Hooper è stato fondamentale! In particolare visivamente, poiché sapeva come fotografare una casa architettonicamente.
November 7, 2025 at 2:06 AM
Hooper ha messo il lavoro. Il film è molto più lento e strano dei film di Spielberg per il fatto che non ha paura di non avere senso. Il lavoro di Hooper è stato fondamentale! In particolare visivamente, poiché sapeva come fotografare una casa architettonicamente.
Le opinioni di futilità di Tobe Hooper sono molto più pronunciate delle eroiche ricerche di Spielberg.
November 7, 2025 at 2:01 AM
Le opinioni di futilità di Tobe Hooper sono molto più pronunciate delle eroiche ricerche di Spielberg.
Avrebbe potuto andare peggio se Hooper non avesse avuto un forte potere di veto!:
November 7, 2025 at 2:00 AM
Avrebbe potuto andare peggio se Hooper non avesse avuto un forte potere di veto!:
Reposted
but without the Beatrice-Straight-ripping-Spielberg a new one (again!) part. So politeness? Not forty years later, not with the passion of defense you hear from these actors for the reality of what they experienced:
October 31, 2025 at 7:12 AM
but without the Beatrice-Straight-ripping-Spielberg a new one (again!) part. So politeness? Not forty years later, not with the passion of defense you hear from these actors for the reality of what they experienced:
day of shooting. Why wasn’t that story the first thing that set manager told in 1982? I think that’s the true politeness. Also wisdom not to expose that Spielberg was not always in power. This anecdote below is told anonymously, but is essentially corroborated by an actor who tells the same story
October 31, 2025 at 7:12 AM
day of shooting. Why wasn’t that story the first thing that set manager told in 1982? I think that’s the true politeness. Also wisdom not to expose that Spielberg was not always in power. This anecdote below is told anonymously, but is essentially corroborated by an actor who tells the same story
“Spielberg talks loud and makes a big show of himself and his contributions,” yes, a juicy story, what is the real story is, “Oh, Spielberg actually wasn’t around as much as they say,” and the notable tea (not polite at all…) of an actor telling the story that Spielberg was reprimanded on the first
October 31, 2025 at 7:12 AM
“Spielberg talks loud and makes a big show of himself and his contributions,” yes, a juicy story, what is the real story is, “Oh, Spielberg actually wasn’t around as much as they say,” and the notable tea (not polite at all…) of an actor telling the story that Spielberg was reprimanded on the first
Spielberg? Poltergeist’s production is marked by a number of strange anomalies - mid-production rewrites, changes in the tone of the script, weird additions that never existed in script form. This is likely attributable to Hooper, known for being a sort of “mad genius.” So while the optics are
October 31, 2025 at 7:12 AM
Spielberg? Poltergeist’s production is marked by a number of strange anomalies - mid-production rewrites, changes in the tone of the script, weird additions that never existed in script form. This is likely attributable to Hooper, known for being a sort of “mad genius.” So while the optics are