@prairieguy2623.bsky.social
Donald Trump, Cum Towel.
November 18, 2025 at 12:00 AM
Donald Trump, Cum Towel.
As scummy as his former boss.
November 17, 2025 at 11:48 PM
As scummy as his former boss.
It’s close enough to make one wonder. And that’s all that you really need to know.
November 17, 2025 at 9:13 PM
It’s close enough to make one wonder. And that’s all that you really need to know.
Didn’t mean to say anything other than heavy drug addiction is a bad thing for the person suffering it, and if social services can help a person deal with it, we should provide those services.
November 17, 2025 at 8:27 PM
Didn’t mean to say anything other than heavy drug addiction is a bad thing for the person suffering it, and if social services can help a person deal with it, we should provide those services.
You just equated Maddow with Hannity.
We’re done here.
We’re done here.
November 17, 2025 at 8:25 PM
You just equated Maddow with Hannity.
We’re done here.
We’re done here.
Not sure we’re disagreeing, but heavy drug use can make any communal living environment untenable.
November 17, 2025 at 8:21 PM
Not sure we’re disagreeing, but heavy drug use can make any communal living environment untenable.
Yeah, you lost me when you all agreed that Russiagate was a Rachel Maddow-led conspiracy theory.
Like all of the idiots who dismiss the Russian interference efforts in 2016 as Facebook memes (Jared Kushner agrees!), you ignore the most effective of them: the selective leaking of DNC emails-mails.
Like all of the idiots who dismiss the Russian interference efforts in 2016 as Facebook memes (Jared Kushner agrees!), you ignore the most effective of them: the selective leaking of DNC emails-mails.
November 17, 2025 at 8:19 PM
Yeah, you lost me when you all agreed that Russiagate was a Rachel Maddow-led conspiracy theory.
Like all of the idiots who dismiss the Russian interference efforts in 2016 as Facebook memes (Jared Kushner agrees!), you ignore the most effective of them: the selective leaking of DNC emails-mails.
Like all of the idiots who dismiss the Russian interference efforts in 2016 as Facebook memes (Jared Kushner agrees!), you ignore the most effective of them: the selective leaking of DNC emails-mails.
And the media will treat this all as if he’s legitimately hamstrung from releasing the files.
This is exactly how this motherfucker has played them over and over and over.
This is exactly how this motherfucker has played them over and over and over.
November 17, 2025 at 6:37 PM
And the media will treat this all as if he’s legitimately hamstrung from releasing the files.
This is exactly how this motherfucker has played them over and over and over.
This is exactly how this motherfucker has played them over and over and over.
I also find it interesting is that the solution is NEVER “and we should devote some of our massive law enforcement budget to providing comprehensive services to get these people off the streets or off of drugs.”
November 17, 2025 at 4:00 PM
I also find it interesting is that the solution is NEVER “and we should devote some of our massive law enforcement budget to providing comprehensive services to get these people off the streets or off of drugs.”
You conceded my point. Now go away.
November 17, 2025 at 1:27 PM
You conceded my point. Now go away.
That’s because opposition from the GOP has been heretofore nonexistent.
November 17, 2025 at 12:59 PM
That’s because opposition from the GOP has been heretofore nonexistent.
I’ll be 64 next month. And my point was not only did Trump achieve the highest level of Latino support in modern history (a point you now concede), he did it despite running the most anti-Latino campaign in my lifetime by a wide margin.
November 17, 2025 at 12:58 PM
I’ll be 64 next month. And my point was not only did Trump achieve the highest level of Latino support in modern history (a point you now concede), he did it despite running the most anti-Latino campaign in my lifetime by a wide margin.
If you think a Latino for Trump in Texas has a problem with what Trump has been doing in Chicago or LA, you’re fooling yourself.
November 17, 2025 at 6:10 AM
If you think a Latino for Trump in Texas has a problem with what Trump has been doing in Chicago or LA, you’re fooling yourself.
This is a ridiculous statement. He’s intentionally targeting Blue states and/or deep-Blue communities in Red states.
November 17, 2025 at 5:48 AM
This is a ridiculous statement. He’s intentionally targeting Blue states and/or deep-Blue communities in Red states.
I guess I’m not seeing why this will have any more lasting effect than the fact he stared that Latinos were rapists and murders when he announced his candidacy.
In the current information environment, impressions are formed and then fade within months or weeks, not decades or years.
In the current information environment, impressions are formed and then fade within months or weeks, not decades or years.
November 17, 2025 at 5:44 AM
I guess I’m not seeing why this will have any more lasting effect than the fact he stared that Latinos were rapists and murders when he announced his candidacy.
In the current information environment, impressions are formed and then fade within months or weeks, not decades or years.
In the current information environment, impressions are formed and then fade within months or weeks, not decades or years.
I suggest you fuck straight off.
November 17, 2025 at 5:40 AM
I suggest you fuck straight off.
This is pointless speculation. He’s been attacking Latinos for his entire political career, and more of them voted for him in 2024 than for any Republican in modern history.
They’re candles in the winds just like every other know-nothing voter.
They’re candles in the winds just like every other know-nothing voter.
November 17, 2025 at 5:06 AM
This is pointless speculation. He’s been attacking Latinos for his entire political career, and more of them voted for him in 2024 than for any Republican in modern history.
They’re candles in the winds just like every other know-nothing voter.
They’re candles in the winds just like every other know-nothing voter.
Weird how I’m seeing way more posts about chess fighting than about your expose’ of the bone-deep corruption that is the Trump Administration.
Wondered how you got that one past Bari in the first place.
Wondered how you got that one past Bari in the first place.
November 17, 2025 at 4:15 AM
Weird how I’m seeing way more posts about chess fighting than about your expose’ of the bone-deep corruption that is the Trump Administration.
Wondered how you got that one past Bari in the first place.
Wondered how you got that one past Bari in the first place.
They could still easily end up 7-10.
November 17, 2025 at 4:08 AM
They could still easily end up 7-10.
Agreed. But it’s a perfect confluence of temperament and strategy to achieve a desired endgame.
November 16, 2025 at 9:39 PM
Agreed. But it’s a perfect confluence of temperament and strategy to achieve a desired endgame.
They don’t think we’re stupid so much as naive and irrelevant.
“How many divisions do the libtards have?”
“How many divisions do the libtards have?”
November 16, 2025 at 9:38 PM
They don’t think we’re stupid so much as naive and irrelevant.
“How many divisions do the libtards have?”
“How many divisions do the libtards have?”
Hard to tell where Trump’s zero-sum thinking ends and malign influence begins.
November 16, 2025 at 9:27 PM
Hard to tell where Trump’s zero-sum thinking ends and malign influence begins.
B, we don’t pay you to write Shakespearean drama. We pay you to use your connections to our political elites to tell us what the fuck is going on.
It ain’t about you.
It ain’t about you.
November 16, 2025 at 6:22 PM
B, we don’t pay you to write Shakespearean drama. We pay you to use your connections to our political elites to tell us what the fuck is going on.
It ain’t about you.
It ain’t about you.
And, as ling as I’m on Maureen Dowd, I really need to get this off my chest:
Even though her days as America’s Top Columnist are thirty years behind us, I saw her recently saying something to the effect of “I don’t want ordinary. I want grand, I want Shakespearean figures to cover.”
Even though her days as America’s Top Columnist are thirty years behind us, I saw her recently saying something to the effect of “I don’t want ordinary. I want grand, I want Shakespearean figures to cover.”
November 16, 2025 at 6:22 PM
And, as ling as I’m on Maureen Dowd, I really need to get this off my chest:
Even though her days as America’s Top Columnist are thirty years behind us, I saw her recently saying something to the effect of “I don’t want ordinary. I want grand, I want Shakespearean figures to cover.”
Even though her days as America’s Top Columnist are thirty years behind us, I saw her recently saying something to the effect of “I don’t want ordinary. I want grand, I want Shakespearean figures to cover.”
It’s like an unintentional parody of Maureen Dowd, with all the intelligence Dowd once displayed stripped out.
The journalists who think her writing is brilliant are all frustrated novelists or poets themselves is my guess.
The journalists who think her writing is brilliant are all frustrated novelists or poets themselves is my guess.
November 16, 2025 at 6:22 PM
It’s like an unintentional parody of Maureen Dowd, with all the intelligence Dowd once displayed stripped out.
The journalists who think her writing is brilliant are all frustrated novelists or poets themselves is my guess.
The journalists who think her writing is brilliant are all frustrated novelists or poets themselves is my guess.