soechsner.de
We found flaws in a supposedly formally verified security proof of LPZK, leading to attacks on soundness and zk.
The culprit: a mismatch between definitions in their code and the original LPZK papers.
cic.iacr.org/p/2/3/24
We found flaws in a supposedly formally verified security proof of LPZK, leading to attacks on soundness and zk.
The culprit: a mismatch between definitions in their code and the original LPZK papers.
cic.iacr.org/p/2/3/24
I got to talk about the tension between theory and practice when studying the security of MPC protocols.
(Thanks to @owenarden.bsky.social for the photo!)
I got to talk about the tension between theory and practice when studying the security of MPC protocols.
(Thanks to @owenarden.bsky.social for the photo!)
plas25.github.io
*deadline June 20 AoE*
No formal proceedings, so you can present ideas or published work. I really enjoy this type of format because of the focus on discussion and community.
plas25.github.io
*deadline June 20 AoE*
No formal proceedings, so you can present ideas or published work. I really enjoy this type of format because of the focus on discussion and community.
If you missed it, you can find all the material from the day on the workshop website caps-workshop.com.
If you missed it, you can find all the material from the day on the workshop website caps-workshop.com.
We are looking forward to exciting talks about cryptographic proofs and proof techniques. Thanks to everyone who submitted a proposal!
protecs-workshop.gitlab.io/accepted
We are looking forward to exciting talks about cryptographic proofs and proof techniques. Thanks to everyone who submitted a proposal!
protecs-workshop.gitlab.io/accepted