Paolo Tamase
@pstamase.bsky.social
120 followers 73 following 15 posts
Asst. Prof., Univ. of the Phil. College of Law (Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, Local Governments, Public Officers, Legal History, Legal Theory) | LL.M. ‘22, Yale Law School | Views are my own.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
pstamase.bsky.social
Credit is also due to Sen. Pres. Drilon, Justice Carpio-Morales, Comm. Sarmiento, and Profs. De Vera and Te who were the panelists for the Emerging Issues Forum, and the RAs (Nick Castro, Jill Chua, Jules Espino, and Ardy Mercado) who helped organize it.
pstamase.bsky.social
Very grateful to PLJ for publishing this. It's a long read, but the summary is that while there are conflicting views, an accountability-based reading of the PH Constitution requires impeachment to proceed, allowing the people themselves to evaluate the case for/against VP Duterte.
phillawjournal.bsky.social
𝗣𝗟𝗝 𝗙𝗼𝗿𝘂𝗺: In the inaugural full-length piece of the Philippine Law Journal Forum, Paolo Tamase (@pstamase.bsky.social) writes about five emerging issues in impeachment.

Read more: philippinelawjournal.org/forum/post/e...
pstamase.bsky.social
This is traced to a long-standing “Tribune of the People” self-characterization by the OSG. But the Admin Code mandates the OSG to be the “legal defender of the Government.” “Independence and autonomy” allow it freedom as to how to and not whether it should do its job. 2/2
pstamase.bsky.social
Subject to a longer piece, I have deep concerns with the OSG’s claim that it can refuse to defend if it disagrees with the position of the current gov’t. The OSG is its statutory counsel. So if at all, the decision not to defend should come from the client, not the lawyer. 1/2
pstamase.bsky.social
Enjoyed writing this with @sosyolohija.bsky.social (with much encouragement from @rosselle.bsky.social). Hoping this opens a discussion on an often neglected aspect of the current impeachment saga—one beyond the legalese—i.e., its shifting function in Philippine democracy.
eastasiaforum.bsky.social
Independent of its merits, Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte’s impeachment exposes the tension between political agendas and constitutional principles, highlighting risks to democratic integrity, write Paolo S Tamase and Athena Charanne Presto.
Impeachment a key weapon in the Philippines’ Marcos–Duterte divide
Independent of its merits, Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte’s impeachment exposes the tension between political agendas and constitutional principles, highlighting risks to democratic integrity, write Paolo S Tamase and Athena Charanne Presto.
eastasiaforum.org
pstamase.bsky.social
Wrote this impeachment primer with Nick Castro ‘25, Jill Chua ‘26, Jules Espino ‘26 and Ardy Mercado ‘26. Grateful for UP Law’s encouragement and helpful feedback of colleagues. Hoping it contributes to more informed discussions on the PH political drama of the season. Link: uplaw.ph/impeachmentp...
pstamase.bsky.social
Nothing wrong with celebrating new lawyers. But if we have Court-centered ceremonies, complete with year-long virtual brand campaigns, are we still celebrating the admission of new lawyers or something else? I think it’s a fair question to ask.
emirvmendoza.bsky.social
Simple po sagot, Prof. @pstamase.bsky.social. Mabigat sa bulsa, matagal, at mahirap mag-aral ng abogasya sa Pilipinas. Di pwede JD agad after HS. Sasalain sa law school at bar exam. Dapat ipagdiwang ang pinaghirapan. Maybe it would be wise to also rethink legal ed in PH? #btin #emirsbtin
pstamase.bsky.social
This would have been an email in New York.

(Which would have prevented the accidental posting before a, most respectfully, unnecessary press conference; word spreading among examinees; withdrawing the posting; causing anxiety to those who saw the result/got word, etc.)
pstamase.bsky.social
It is completely fair to ask, for whom is all of this really?
pstamase.bsky.social
I’ve been in law (and a law family) long enough to see one step forward, one step back when it comes to PH bar reform. And a step back that we keep making is turning the exam and the release of results into a grander ceremony than the last.
pstamase.bsky.social
This would have been an email in New York.

(Which would have prevented the accidental posting before a, most respectfully, unnecessary press conference; word spreading among examinees; withdrawing the posting; causing anxiety to those who saw the result/got word, etc.)
pstamase.bsky.social
PLJ is now on Bluesky! And I understand that the PLJ will launch its fully revamped website in Jan 2025. In the meantime, you can request the piece via PLJ on Demand at philippinelawjournal.org. 2/2
Philippine Law Journal
The Philippine Law Journal is an independent and student-edited law review of the University of the Philippines (U.P.) College of Law.
philippinelawjournal.org
pstamase.bsky.social
The PH Supreme Court’s intent-based standard for plagiarism is a bigger threat to academic/rsch integrity in law schools than AI. In this piece now on Hein, I revisit the Vinuya saga to argue for prohibiting plagiarism for efficiency-based reasons. Thanks to the PLJ for publishing my views! 1/2
phillawjournal.bsky.social
The Issue concludes with an essay by UP Law Assistant Professor Paolo S. Tamase which shows how the understanding of plagiarism attributable to the case of Vinuya v. Romulo has shaped legal research ethics. heinonline.org/HOL/Page?han...
pstamase.bsky.social
Why do non-Americans care about US elections? In Quezon City PH, classes are cancelled for the nth time this term due to severe weather—the most I remember. Climate change is worsening inequalities in countries that contributed the least to it. But oh no the price of eggs and male loneliness
Reposted by Paolo Tamase
yaleisp.bsky.social
We're so excited to host our Propaganda and Emerging Technologies conference next week! Join us for discussions on hate speech, misinformation, manipulation, electoral influence + more

Friday April 5 - Saturday April 6, 2024

Program and registration: law.yale.edu/isp/events/p...
pstamase.bsky.social
Great read from Akshat Agarwal. Students of conlaw who have seen maximalist-minimalist swings in their own apex courts can draw a lot of insights from this. Also a good reminder that judicial review has a different dynamic in the majority world—and even within, it varies widely.
verfassungsblog.de
"A sharp and worrying break."

This week, the Supreme Court of India rejected marriage equality in Indian law.

AKSHAT AGARWAL on constitutional interpretation as a terrain of contestation and the far-reaching implications of the decision for LGBTQ+ rights.

verfassungsblog.de/marriage-equ...